It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Skyfloating
Search warrant for Weiners electronic devices unsealed
originally posted by: liveandlearn
originally posted by: Aallanon
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Come on Q'sters. Q gave us all a shout out in there last drop and nobody here picked up on it? Take a closer look at the 23. Your welcome btw.
I'm failing to see the shout out.
I am with you on this. Difficult to see how the word PAIN relates to ATS unless someone has read every forum involving Q on the internet and watched all analysis.
PE, would you explain how you came to this conclusion for those of us who are lost?
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Perfectenemy
The rumour about MM not being able to get pregnant is interesting as in the UK press there have been a few reports saying the royal couple want to have children as soon as possible.
Sunday express article
The Masonic Order is one such example. To be a Mason one must accept that there is a God, and engage in philanthropic endeavours, yet the very nature of Freemasonry is shrouded in secrecy, occultic rituals and, at its highest levels is, according to some of it’s highest ranking leaders, Luciferian. These are fools that hide behind a lie (as if there were no God, or that he simply wasn’t bothered) to justify their abominable works/iniquities.
Children at a Salvation Army boys' home in Sydney were "rented out" to strangers who sexually abused them, the royal commission into child sexual abuse has heard.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Perfectenemy
It is that important to the royal bloodline that I'm pretty certain prospective wives are given fertility checks before the Queen will give her assent.
Hollywood Reporter says they went to a fertility doctor before the wedding.
Even back in the 70s/80s Diana had to prove herself in the sack before Charles proposed; as reported in this Daily Mail article that tells us they had two "assignations in a railway carriage".
It's a royal rule to have at least 2 children- "an heir and a spare"!
Having said the above, it's worth thinking about what could happen if Harry and Meghan couldn't have kids! I can see them adopting some children from Prince Harry's charitable organisations in Africa. This would really challenge the laws of nobility - would an adopted coloured eldest son inherit the title Duke of Sussex on Harry's death. Could the plan be to adopt a "chosen one" into the royal family, a bit like Obama being chosen to be president?
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: liveandlearn
originally posted by: Aallanon
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Come on Q'sters. Q gave us all a shout out in there last drop and nobody here picked up on it? Take a closer look at the 23. Your welcome btw.
I'm failing to see the shout out.
I am with you on this. Difficult to see how the word PAIN relates to ATS unless someone has read every forum involving Q on the internet and watched all analysis.
PE, would you explain how you came to this conclusion for those of us who are lost?
Alright i thought it was obvious but here we go. Vanadium V+V=VV. Do you still believe in coincidences?