-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -s3V3n-

A few days ago I was re reading the early Q drops. I first started reading about Nov 1 and went back to Oct 28. I remembered we had advance notice of SA.

After finding it I thought it would be a good info for new people who question and a reminder for all of us who are here, esp. if a doubt creeps in.

This is how it began

Nov 1 2017 00:41:54 (EST)
Think about it logically.
The only way is the military. Fully controlled. Save & spread
(once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker).
Biggest advanced drop on Pol.

Here Q (not then known as Q) begins to clue us in about SA with questions.

Nov 2 2017 16:04:05 (EST)
How did SA welcome POTUS during his trip?
Why was this historic and not covered by MSM?
How did SA welcome BO during his trip?
How did SA welcome HRC during her trip?
Why is this relevant?
Not suggesting SA is clean by any means but they play a role in this global game of RISK.

Nov 3 2017 16:33:30 (EST)
Why did JK travel to SA recently?
What is SA known for?
Where do the biggest donations originate from?
Why is this relevant?
What else is relevant w/ SA?
Safe harbor?
Port of transfer?

Nov 4 is the day of the SA round up. At least it is the day we heard of it. Not sure of the time difference in SA and US.
Below I have only included the SA references.

Nov 4 2017 18:33:30 (EST
Why is SA so vitally important?
Follow the money.
Who has the money?
What is happening in SA today?
Why is this relevant?

What is the relationship between SA & Pakistan?
Why is this relevant?
Why would SA provide tens of millions of dollars to US senior gov't officials?
What does SA obtain in exchange for payment?
Why is access important?
What happened when HRC lost the election of 2016?
How much money was provided to the CF by SA during 15/16?
HRC lost.
Loss of access/power/control.
Does repayment of funds to SA occur? If so, how?

What attack took place in SA as operations were undertaken? Flying objects.
What US operators are currently in SA?

Nov 4 2017 23:15:02 (EST)
What are the laws in SA v. US (charged criminals)?
What information might be gained by these detainees?
Why is this important?
SA ---> US
What force is actively deployed in SA?
NG?

Somewhere in this time frame he kept asking where is Huma. I recalled a report last week of Oct that Huma had boarded a plane to SA. At the time I thought she may be trying to escape. Now I wonder if she had info and went over to negotiate/bribe.

Anyway, I think this may be a good place to start for those who question. If they read and still question, well, just let it go

originally posted by: Skyfloating

"I'll take, 'What Black-Eyed Kids look like when they grow up' for $500, Alex."

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

The largest European Newspaper (German Language) is Mockingbird on Steroids. They publish stuff like this every day:

Headline Translation: U.S. President Trump calls Immigrants ANIMALS



Source

The article then goes on to explain how Trump is a Racist, White Supremacist, etc.

No mention of MS-13. Fake News.

BUCKLE UP: Anthony Weiner search & seizure warrant just UNSEALED

twitter.com...

a reply to: carewemust

Yep. I’ve thought he was a white hat since I first heard the MSM smokescreen story for the interview. He was ineligible. Only option is recommissioned & pardoned/deal.

Q is calling the document %100 authentic.

We shall see. Holy crap.

Boom?

Here is the PACER website.

You have to be a legal professional to log in.

Any Lawf@gs around?

pacer.login.uscourts.gov...

Maybe the frazzledrip fake was put out to see what blackhats would do to stop it.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Exactly. DJT likely gave him a quick Y/N and when he agreed to work he was recommissioned, hence the length, and then got to work on what to do to make this op work.

Watch NY.

CA Next?

triple post

site is wonky

Is this really happening?

I can't be the only one here seeing this.

originally posted by: TomLawless
Is this really happening?

I can't be the only one here seeing this.

It has happened. It is happening. It will happen some more.

Another supposed do-gooder exposed.

Oxfam Box steps down in "Sex for Aid" scheme

Does "Pickle" = Weiner?

Unsealed indictment for Weiner? Is it starting..?

twitter.com...

originally posted by: TomLawless
Q is calling the document %100 authentic.

We shall see. Holy crap.

Boom?

youtu.be...

a reply to: The GUT

Ron De Santis was a guest on a great Hannity show this evening. Hannity asked him if he trusts that OIG Horowitz would issue a complete and honest report, since he was an Obama appointee.

De Santis said that this is one reason why Congressional Committees want to see all of the unredacted original documents with their own eyes.

Sara Carter (also a guest tonight) stated that Horowitz is to be fully trusted. She then proceeded to spell out the reasons why.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Well, actually...

Furthering this goal, today, we are here to announce some of the steps being taken and underway by the National Insider Threat Task Force to ensure that this government’s first priority—to protect this country and her citizens—is not undermined by the very people who have been entrusted to protect it.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions Delivers Remarks at Briefing on Leaks of Classified Materials Threatening National Security - Department of Justice

This is the task force that targets leaks of classified information.

Make note of this crumb:

Q !2jsTvXXmXs 66 📁
May 7 2018 23:36:41 (EST)
Think LOGICALLY.
Mass exodus in DC?
Mass exodus - corporate CEOs?
Why?
Who has the POWER?
Who has the CONTROL?
If POTUS was NOT IN CONTROL would they be retreating?
Who is the AG?
Who MUST approve the firing/dismissal of DOJ officials?
Re_read DOJ org change (open source - more in pipe)
Who is the FBI director?
Who MUST approve the firing/dismissal of FBI agents?
Re_read FBI org change (open source - more in pipe)
If SESSIONS & WRAY are DC SWAMP/DEEP STATE why are they cleaning their respective houses?
Use LOGIC.
Why are they slow walking unredacted data?
Why are they slow walking doc disclosures?
Why is the WH backing up DOJ?
What if the same data is being used by other investigators?
What does it mean if a grand jury is impanelled?
Why are confusing questions asked as to outcome re: Mueller?
What would be the purpose of creating confusion?
What was Sessions' Senate confirmation vote?
What was RR's Senate confirmation vote?
If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Common denominator.
Why did Sessions pick RR?
Everyone has an opinion.
Few have the facts.
Few know the plan.
Midterms [save & push]?
Swing voters to retake House/Senate?
Impeachment proceedings (open source) initiated?
Power at all costs?
Blue wave?
Use LOGIC.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?
What is the DOJ responsible for?
What is the FBI responsible for?
Why did HRC get a free pass?
Use LOGIC.
Define single shooter.
Who is HUBER?
Define IG.
When does SESSIONS step back in?
Already is?
Why did SESSIONS secretly engage HUBER?
Why did SESSIONS reveal HUBER?
Timing is everything.
Department of Justice does not discuss ongoing investigations or confirm specific matters,
What about the active investigation into leaks?
"Horowitz oversees a nationwide workforce of more than 450 special agents, auditors, inspectors, attorneys, and support staff whose mission is to detect and deter waste, fraud, abuse, and misconduct in DOJ programs and personnel, and to promote economy and efficiency in Department operations."
Why did MP step into the C_A prior to Sec of State?
They are deeply connected.
Think Offshore.
MIL INTEL providing support during this time?
Why are select EO's aggressively being written and put into law?
State/C_A next?
Think logically.
No outside comms.
JUSTICE.
Q

emphasis mine

Q

Now, more from the DOJ link earlier in this post:

While the Department of Justice does not discuss ongoing investigations or confirm specific matters, it is important for the American people—and for those who might be thinking about leaking sensitive or classified information—to know that criminals who would illegally use their access to our most sensitive information to endanger our national security are, in fact, being investigated and prosecuted. Since January, the Department has more than tripled the number of active leak investigations compared to the number pending at the end of the last Administration. And we have already charged four people with unlawfully disclosing classified material or with concealing contacts with foreign intelligence officers.

emphasis mine

Notice anything?

...back to catching up on the thread...