It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CCKP72
Can anyone please point me in the direction of any list of the CEO and/or political resignations since we 'met' Q? I thought I had a site bookmarked but it seems as though it's a broken link now. Merci in advance!
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: butcherguy
It's a chess opening D4 to D5, but why?
Queens pawn game
Anybody have a clue?
1) This is my #Qanon thread for May 15, 2018
Q posts can be found here: qanon.pub
My theme: Pain coming
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: CoramDeo
And Stormy's lawyer is threatening to retaliate against Barnes, and anyone else who attempts to confront him.
Thread I started a few hours ago: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Congressional investigators are taking a fresh look at testimony provided in 2017 by Glenn Simpson, the founder of the opposition firm that commissioned the Steele dossier.
In particular, investigators are looking at Simpson’s claim in an Aug. 22 interview that he had learned from dossier author Christopher Steele that the FBI had corroborated parts of the dossier with information from a source within President Donald Trump’s campaign.
Simpson, who runs Fusion GPS, told the panel that “a human source from inside the Trump organization” had provided information to the FBI that backed up some of the dossier. The person was “someone like us who decided to pick up the phone and report something,” he said.
Sources close to Fusion GPS quickly backpedaled from Simpson’s statement when a transcript of his testimony was released in January.
The sources told news outlets Simpson was mistaken. There was no mole inside the Trump campaign. Instead, he was referring to George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign adviser whose encounter with an Australian diplomat in May 2016 was reportedly the catalyst for the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation. The diplomat, Alexander Downer, reportedly claimed that Papadopoulos discussed Russian dirt on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. (RELATED: Revelations From Fusion GPS Founder’s Testimony)
originally posted by: crankyoldman
I see our friend needed a decaff, or at least a half caff.
The demagogue's handle please.........
Your a demon if you leave that hanging....
@
BTW, seriously, what's the point of...
originally posted by: TheGOAT
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: CoramDeo
And Stormy's lawyer is threatening to retaliate against Barnes, and anyone else who attempts to confront him.
Thread I started a few hours ago: www.abovetopsecret.com...
Stromy's lawyer is a big mouth. People like that, who thrust themselves into the spotlight with these tiny threats and attention wanting attitudes, tend to self destruct sooner than later. It's like when you have one of the seven deadly sins and after a while, it becomes too much for you to handle because you bit off more than you can chew. He'll fall that way, by his own demise. Not sure how long it will take, but it will happen.
In digital security
Regarding digital security, the cryptological meaning and application of non-repudiation shifts to mean:[2]
A service that provides proof of the integrity and origin of data.
An authentication that can be asserted to be genuine with high assurance.
Proof of data integrity is typically the easiest of these requirements to accomplish. A data hash, such as SHA2, is usually sufficient to establish that the likelihood of data being undetectably changed is extremely low. Even with this safeguard, it is still possible to tamper with data in transit, either through a man-in-the-middle attack or phishing. Due to this flaw, data integrity is best asserted when the recipient already possesses the necessary verification information.
The most common method of asserting the digital origin of data is through digital certificates, a form of public key infrastructure to which digital signatures belong. Note that the public key scheme is not used for encryption in this form; i.e. the goal is not to achieve confidentiality, since a message signed with a private key can be read by anyone using the public key. Verifying the digital origin means that the certified/signed data can be, with reasonable certainty, trusted to be from somebody who possesses the private key corresponding to the signing certificate. If the key is not properly safeguarded by the original owner, digital forgery can become a major concern.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: butcherguy
It's a chess opening D4 to D5, but why?
Queens pawn game
Anybody have a clue?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Unrolled thread...worth a read:
1) This is my #Qanon thread for May 15, 2018
Q posts can be found here: qanon.pub
My theme: Pain coming
threadreaderapp.com...