-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -s3V3n-

a reply to: YouCannotBeSerious

My friend,

I know exactly what cryptic means. It is silly of you to assume I don't.

Here is an example:

Thank you Kim.
Deal made.
Clowns out.
Strings cut.
We took control.
Iran next.
Q

- March 9, 2018

This was not cryptic at all. We knew he was talking about Kim Jong Un (North Korea), and a deal was made with NK with a positive outcome. That was posted back in March.

This is an example of "future proves past". In March (the past) Q posted about that deal being made with Kim. Then come April (the future) the media starts reporting about a secret CIA meeting with NK that took place weeks ago with positive results. For those who had been watching Q this was verification that he has some type of connections, he somehow knew about the secret CIA meeting before anyone else, as well as the positive outcome of it.

Assume the above two posts will also be removed. For consistency.


Still hoping someone can post that non-cryptic obvious prediction.

Shall we play a game?
Can you trust?
You know that we know.
You know what we have.
Your move.
Q

I mean... seriously. How do you not see this as a scam. They are dangling the bait... pointless, cryptic, meaningless posts like this one. Why? Why on earth would any credible "insider" think a post like the quote above would help at all... its ONLY purpose is to play on the ego of those who want to play detective and want to feel part of something.

Its going to happen

1995 seems like so long ago, but not really.



Directed by Kathryn Bigelow, Order Of The Easter Star recipient

a reply to: More1ThanAny1

Ahahaha

You don't think

Thank you Kim.
Deal made.
Clowns out.
Strings cut.
We took control.
Iran next.
Q

is cryptic... honestly? Does everyone else agree that this isn't at all cryptic.

Two word sentences, non-specific descriptions "control" "clowns" "strings" "next"... meaningless. Deal is the only word you are hanging onto.

If it wasn't cryptic it would name North Korea... they didn't name it to cover their backs so if a deal with NK wasn't made you wouldn't be able to call it a failed prediction. Thats why they are never specific... that's why its cryptic... fear of failure.

You can't be proved wrong if no-one can prove what you were trying to say.

originally posted by: YouCannotBeSerious
a reply to: More1ThanAny1

Correctly predicted the same way Nostradamus predicted events... throw a 1000 blindfolded cryptic darts and one is bound to land eventually.

Its so simple. Its catchphrases, cliches, initials... Q doesn't need to know anything, you guys will interpret it for him. He could post just a bunch of random numbers and letters and you'd somehow make a connection after the event

Weak sauce.
Too late.
PAIN.
The Storm is real.
Look up.

FromThe Conservative Treehouse

Explosive. Former Trump campaign aide Michael Caputo appeared on Fox News moments ago with stunning statements. According to Caputo a contractor with a government agency was attempting to pass to him, through an intermediary, Hillary Clinton emails; and the intermediary reached out to Caputo to inform him therein.

Talk about a BooM

originally posted by: liveandlearn

FromThe Conservative Treehouse
exnews]Explosive. Former Trump campaign aide Michael Caputo appeared on Fox News moments ago with stunning statements. According to Caputo a contractor with a government agency was attempting to pass to him, through an intermediary, Hillary Clinton emails; and the intermediary reached out to Caputo to inform him therein.

Talk about a BooM

That's weird, I just watched him moments ago deny anyone ever approached him with Hillary's email.

We from the same dimension? I'm confused.

Laura Ingram show right?

a reply to: twohawks

Ok so first off... why couldn't they spell it verbatim. Why do they need you to solve a riddle... whats the benefit. Other than they know their audience love puzzles? They are pandering to their target market.

Secondly... you must be completely deluded if you think anything in that post was even close to specific.

It's ALL empty predictions, they write something that can't fail. If the deal happens "great" they look like they predicted it. If no deal is announced it gets forgotten or allocated to something else that happened that week. Similar to how other "deals" that Q announced were decoded to mean people cutting deals ... etc.

Its a play, they always have an out... your too blind and too deep to question anything.

a reply to: twohawks

This isn't the Mudd pit.

a reply to: YouCannotBeSerious

My friend,

Perhaps it is you that doesn't know what cryptic means. The definition is "having a meaning that is mysterious or obscure". There is nothing mysterious about a deal being made with someone named Kim. Clowns out, strings cut, we took control, is not cryptic at all. The context/theme has always been draining the swamp, or kicking out the deep state. So obviously this is a message within context.

Sure, things do look cryptic when you ignore the context.

Light is a symphony that echos for eternity.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

No, Neil Cavuto. There is a video at the site that is more revealing.

a reply to: YouCannotBeSerious

If you read the first six threads, you will see that what you are saying here:

I mean... seriously. How do you not see this as a scam. They are dangling the bait... pointless, cryptic, meaningless posts like this one. Why? Why on earth would any credible "insider" think a post like the quote above would help at all... its ONLY purpose is to play on the ego of those who want to play detective and want to feel part of something.

is nothing new.
It has been covered before..... many times.

What you could do, and it wouldn’t cause any strife, is tell everyone that you think it is a scam and say why you think so, then be on your merry way.
If this is all a scam, and everyone here is deluded, why in the world would you want to interact with this thread?

originally posted by: More1ThanAny1
a reply to: YouCannotBeSerious

My friend,

No thanks.

The definition is "having a meaning that is mysterious or obscure".

So far so good.

There is nothing mysterious about a deal being made with someone named Kim.

It didn't say a deal being made with someone named Kim.

It said Thanks Kim. Deal made. Which fits your previous definition of cryptic. See how you just explained it yourself?

What strings? Who are the clowns? Specifics please. Took control of what? NK? Did Trump take control of NK, did he cut strings with NK? Which clowns left NK?

If it wasn't cryptic you'd be able to answer those above without conjecture or opinion.

originally posted by: YouCannotBeSerious
a reply to: More1ThanAny1

Ahahaha

You don't think

Thank you Kim.
Deal made.
Clowns out.
Strings cut.
We took control.
Iran next.
Q

is cryptic... honestly? Does everyone else agree that this isn't at all cryptic.

Two word sentences, non-specific descriptions "control" "clowns" "strings" "next"... meaningless. Deal is the only word you are hanging onto.

If it wasn't cryptic it would name North Korea... they didn't name it to cover their backs so if a deal with NK wasn't made you wouldn't be able to call it a failed prediction. Thats why they are never specific... that's why its cryptic... fear of failure.

You can't be proved wrong if no-one can prove what you were trying to say.

OK, let's say Q is just a game or joke.

Do you know how many people's eyes have been opened to what is really going on with our government? Do you know how many people are actually digging and finding the truths for themselves instead of watching "The News"? Then even if Q was started as a game, it doesn't matter now.

We are Q
Where we go one
We go all
The Storm is real

And maybe you haven't noticed, but things are happening in Washington and I would dare to say that the deep state is #ting their pants right now.

a reply to: YouCannotBeSerious

If you are not my friend, then I do not wish to speak to you.

originally posted by: YouCannotBeSerious
a reply to: twohawks

Ok so first off... why couldn't they spell it verbatim. Why do they need you to solve a riddle... whats the benefit. Other than they know their audience love puzzles? They are pandering to their target market.

Secondly... you must be completely deluded if you think anything in that post was even close to specific.

It's ALL empty predictions, they write something that can't fail. If the deal happens "great" they look like they predicted it. If no deal is announced it gets forgotten or allocated to something else that happened that week. Similar to how other "deals" that Q announced were decoded to mean people cutting deals ... etc.

Its a play, they always have an out... your too blind and too deep to question anything.[/quoto

Ok first off, I've been watching them play there game since the early seventies, the rule book hasn't changed because it worked for them for better than forty years... Psyops... The problem that has arisen is they no longer control the puppet master. Take away the control issues and their left dangling in the wind...scattering about, trying to regain control...

a reply to: wanderingconfusion
I'm missing it, not seeing what's at the top. Gold trim around the flags, is that it? Throw me a bone pweeez

What i do see is some people appearing to look sad or defeated.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Thanks! Did that Q post come before or after I asked my
question? Just curious, as I am not sure of their time zone.