It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: michaelsuede
originally posted by: neoholographic
What's the basis for materialism in science?
Many scientists claim the only real science that can be done is on things that can be measured. They are at a loss to explain the qualia of consciousness so they pretend it doesn't exist.
If you can't measure something, you can't claim to know much about it from a scientific perspective, since science is based on measurements.
originally posted by: michaelsuede
Many scientists claim the only real science that can be done is on things that can be measured.
Science has been at a loss to explain many things over the years, but time has shown it doesn't always remain so and sometimes science figures out ways to understand things it didn't understand before.
They are at a loss to explain the qualia of consciousness so they pretend it doesn't exist.
originally posted by: DJW001
No, they simply do not try to measure it. Big difference.
The Hard Problem of consciousness has been dismissed as an illusion. By showing that computers
are capable of experiencing, we show that they are at least rudimentarily conscious with potential
to eventually reach superconsciousness. The main contribution of the paper is a test for confirming
certain subjective experiences in a tested agent. We follow with analysis of benefits and problems
with conscious machines and implications of such capability on future of computing, machine
rights and artificial intelligence safety...
The author is grateful to Elon Musk and the Future of Life Institute and to Jaan Tallinn and
Effective Altruism Ventures for partially funding his work on AI Safety.