"Bloody Gina" Confirmation Hearing

originally posted by: ipsedixit

originally posted by: MRinder

Also couldn't calling a woman Bloody Gina be considered a tad sexist?

Very sexist and very Trumpian. It shows how his malign influence has spread even to his enemies.

It's about as sexist as bloody Bob. Everyone in or once in the intel community has blood on their hands, so it is an adequate, if not accurate "honorary." As far as the spread of dysfunctional mental illness, that very likely started with the progressive entitled ideology. Any seepage of that ideological sewage probably started with the extreme left, if it has even occurred, which I doubt, with trump.

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: MRinder
a reply to: ipsedixit

I think our adversaries are going to be scared straight. We will have a Secretary of Defense named Mad Dog and a head of the CIA named Bloody Gina. What's next, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff going to be called Butcher? Psychological Warfare baby!

Also couldn't calling a woman Bloody Gina be considered a tad sexist?

Considering you'd be called 'Bloody Whatever' at some point...

I wish Trumpers paid more attention to Trump.

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
As far as the spread of dysfunctional mental illness, that very likely started with the progressive entitled ideology. Any seepage of that ideological sewage probably started with the extreme left, if it has even occurred, which I doubt, with trump.

Cheers - Dave

www.telegraph.co.uk...

Donald Trump has continued to attack the woman who hosted the Republican debate, describing her as unprofessional, talentless and menstrual after she challenged him over his comments about women.

Megyn Kelly, one of the hosts of Thursday night's debate, questioned him over his years of anti-women remarks. The question infuriated Mr Trump.

"You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her — wherever," he said after the debate, speaking on CNN.

a reply to: DBCowboy

That's a good idea, we should seriously do it for like, 3 or 4 months. All military go home except the necessary staff to run a base, close down as many bases as possible, cut off all foreign aid, don't offer an opinion or intervene in any situation outside our territory...

I bet the whole "evil USA" rhetoric would come to a stop real quick. There would be a unified chorus "Please take control of the world again!"

If we made them go 6 months, they would be begging for the opportunity to sign over their sovereignty if it meant things could go back to normal, and become anexxed as a US territory.

The Elite could have created the ONE WORLD GOV already if they wanted. They just don't want our US Constitution as it's foundation, or predecessor, or whatever. They want to try to convince us that the ideas in that document are in error.

originally posted by: wylekat

originally posted by: MRinder
a reply to: ipsedixit

I think our adversaries are going to be scared straight. We will have a Secretary of Defense named Mad Dog and a head of the CIA named Bloody Gina. What's next, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff going to be called Butcher? Psychological Warfare baby!

Also couldn't calling a woman Bloody Gina be considered a tad sexist?

Considering you'd be called 'Bloody Whatever' at some point...

I thought it was cute when Trump said about Megan Kelly "You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her whatever."

www.cnn.com...

We need more straight talk like that in politics.

a reply to: ipsedixit

Remember when Trump talked about Megyn Kelly’s bloody gina?

a reply to: 3n19m470

Who is "they", the whole world?

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

Now Johnny we all know that you are only considered a war criminal and/or hung if you lose. Winners write the history books and make the rules. Personally, I have never understood why there are rules for war. Does that mean if you kill people by the rules it makes you more ethical?

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

Now Johnny we all know that you are only considered a war criminal and/or hung if you lose. Winners write the history books and make the rules. Personally, I have never understood why there are rules for war. Does that mean if you kill people by the rules it makes you more ethical?

Trump attacked Syria for allegedly gassing civilians...you tell me.

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

Now Johnny we all know that you are only considered a war criminal and/or hung if you lose. Winners write the history books and make the rules. Personally, I have never understood why there are rules for war. Does that mean if you kill people by the rules it makes you more ethical?

Trump attacked Syria for allegedly gassing civilians...you tell me.

Trump bombed Syria because Obama drew a red line which he never enforced. That made us look weak. Trump doesn't like weakness so therefore Trump backed up that red line regardless of who drew it. It buys him credibility for future negotiations, because people will know he has no intention of being weak unlike Obama.

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

Now Johnny we all know that you are only considered a war criminal and/or hung if you lose. Winners write the history books and make the rules. Personally, I have never understood why there are rules for war. Does that mean if you kill people by the rules it makes you more ethical?

Trump attacked Syria for allegedly gassing civilians...you tell me.

Trump bombed Syria because Obama drew a red line which he never enforced. That made us look weak. Trump doesn't like weakness so therefore Trump backed up that red line regardless of who drew it. It buys him credibility for future negotiations, because people will know he has no intention of being weak unlike Obama.

Sure. Cuz he's a deep thinker.

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: MRinder

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

Now Johnny we all know that you are only considered a war criminal and/or hung if you lose. Winners write the history books and make the rules. Personally, I have never understood why there are rules for war. Does that mean if you kill people by the rules it makes you more ethical?

Trump attacked Syria for allegedly gassing civilians...you tell me.

Trump bombed Syria because Obama drew a red line which he never enforced. That made us look weak. Trump doesn't like weakness so therefore Trump backed up that red line regardless of who drew it. It buys him credibility for future negotiations, because people will know he has no intention of being weak unlike Obama.

Sure. Cuz he's a deep thinker.

I never said he was a deep thinker, lol. He is on the other hand a great marketer, salesman, and negotiator. Lying Ted was marketing genius sold to the American people by a great salesman.

a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Deflection, so you won´t have to admit he´s right.

a reply to: ipsedixit

Call me crazy, I do not trust someone in charge of the CIA. Or being considered for the position.

She made it clear the CIA would do nothing immoral. Now...third party, non-disclosure contractors on the other hand...well, she can't speak for them.

originally posted by: ipsedixit
a reply to: DBCowboy

I think Trump has flipped everybody off and they are going to go their own way, at least on the Iran nuclear deal. Trumpers should be very pleased. America is finally shucking off its allies. I wonder where they'll all go.

Who needs friends like that?

"Are you the god of hammers?"

As someone said, With us or against us.

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: whyamIhere
So, you mean after 911 there were a few extra dead guys ?
I'm comfortable with that.
I want people like this bloody b!tch in charge.

Ok...but after WW2, the US hanged Japanese for waterboarding Americans. At which point were they war criminals? Then or now?

Come on Man, it was illegal then, maybe.

Legal after 9/11, now, not so much I guess.

Let the dems stop the 1st woman head of the CIA.

That will go down great for them in 2018 and 2020.

Love the retro morality, tho.

Tear down another statue, make ya feel better.

didnt they make a movie about her? im trying to remeber what it was...

she had red hair and was put off at first then gets all blood thirsty..

originally posted by: partiotmeesle
didnt they make a movie about her? im trying to remeber what it was...

she had red hair and was put off at first then gets all blood thirsty..

I told my wife she looks like my ex SIL with dyed hair.

She was a Ginger and navy Intel, Lt. Commander.

Stationed in Nebraska.

That would be so cool! lol, but no way. Haskel is too old by a couple yrs.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

They'll confirm her but will have made plenty of campaign commercials touting their "moral" stances.


Democrats claiming morals.

heh.