It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Some of it I think has to do with how the right-wing echo chamber has stopping faking alarm over things like the economy.
Case in point: yesterday, DBCowby authored a thread about how the unemployment numbers are bull#. This is something you don't hear from Trump supporters typically which is surprising because the unemployment figure that is being touted by this administration (U3) is the same that was constantly called "fake" when Obama was in office to dismiss the drop in unemployment. Try Googling ATS for "real unemployment" (site:www.abovetopsecret.com +"real unemployment") and you'll find years of right-wingers complaining that the employment situation was really much worse than the Obama admin (actually the BLS but whatever) was letting on.
This one is great because it has a quote from Trump himself:
Trump puts true US unemployment rate at 20 percent
Presumptive US Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has challenged President Barack Obama’s claim regarding the country’s unemployment rate of five percent. "We have tremendous deficits. Don't believe the 5 percent. The real [unemployment] number is 20 percent," Trump said
Go ahead and take a peek. When Obama left office, the U3 figure was 4.8% and dropping. When he entered office it was 7.8% and rising (it peaked at 10% at the height of the GR). It now stands at 3.9% and all of a sudden the U3 figure is fine with the same people who were claiming that same figure at 5% was masking 20%+ unemployment... and the destruction of America.
There's been an additional .9% drop in unemployment in a continuing trend and Trump and his supporters are acting like he saved us from the brink of destruction and somehow turned things around. If looking at the EXACT same figure and concluding that it means completely different things depending on who was President isn't cognitive dissonance, I don't know what it is.
When was the last time you heard a Trump supporter freaking out over deficit spending and the national debt? Years of Chicken Little conservatives running around screeching about how the sky was falling.
The Republicans cut taxes. Trump has promised a big fat trillion dollar infrastructure plan. We're dumping billions and billions into the military industrial complex. This idiot's blabbering about a "Space Force." Meanwhile, the Treasury borrowed $488 billion in the first quarter of this year.
That's the most since 2008.
Throughout the Obama administration the national debt hung heavy in the right-wing echo chamber, like a choking cloud of deadly gas that was killing America... thanks to Obama the Destroyer of America. Now? What debt? What deficit? What are these strange D words? Oh wait, I have another one: dissonance as in cognitive dissonance.
Or maybe we should talk about "Draining the Swamp" and how that's *actually* working out?
originally posted by: introvert
Ya. Turns out there was some bite to that one.
Not saying there was collusion
but people around him sure put themselves in precarious positions that made it perfectly reasonable to question what the hell they were doing.
That is why were are in the position we are in today.
So what's not to like? His hair? His twitter?
Sounds to me that he's doing okay on foreign policy also.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: kurthall
As all of these things were already VASTLY improved under Obama, that is a fact.
You've got strange facts.
2008 (Bush): 5.0
2009 (BO): 7.8
2010: 9.0
2011: 9.1
2012: 8.3
2013: 8.0
2014: 6.6
2015: 5.7
2016: 4.9
2017(Trump): 4.8
2018ytd: 4.1
Can't deny Obama inherited a pile of steaming poop that helped tank his numbers, but not a single one of those figures was VASTLY improved over... Well, whatever you were attempting to compare it to.
Do you not consider a drop from 9.1 at it's high to 4.9 at it's low when he left office to be a significant improvement?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: carewemust
CNN is trying their level best to keep Americans from seeing how this country is getting better/stronger all the time.
Then why did they release this poll?
Last night, they kept the lid on how serious the New York Attorney General's crimes are, by saying Schneiderman allegedly EMOTIONALLY abused some women. (This was Don Lemon and his panel)
They do not know how serious his "crimes" are. They only know how serious the allegations are.
The media cannot throw around accusations and unproven conspiracy theories as easily as people do anonymously on the internet. They can be held liable for what they say.
If you were held to a similar standard, you would be much more cautious about the nonsense you peddle.
Can anyone say "Q"?