New FOIA Documents Reveal FBI LOST Chain of Custody of Hillary’s Server for Five Weeks

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: soberbacchus

What they said was she did in fact do it, but because they thought she did not really mean it they would not prosecute. The investigation conclusion was in fact she did it though, that the wrongdoing did occur.

Wow.

Move on.

Sad, desperate, OBSSESED.

Investigation over, no charges.

You just lost all credability in my eyes. Obviously another anti trump circle jerk.


We needed another one of those

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law

Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?

The server was never lost.

Yep I am a bad typer

Better than being a shill cheering for corruption

It is possible to be both.

originally posted by: Grambler
SO we have a couple anti trumpers commenting basically saying this is no big deal, who cares if the FBI l;ost chain of custody.

Brushing aside that this is obviously a ludicrous statement, i just wanted to point out that the rest of the trump haters, intel community defenders are nowhere to be found.

BUt I am sure they will be back on other stories telling us how we need to trust the intel community and believe them even when the cant show us proof of their claims.

Its so transparent that for them its not about having a non corrupt system including an intel agency that is fair, competent, and seeks justice, but getting trump atv all costs, even if that means cheering for intel agency corruption or incompetence.

I think this sums it up nicely Grambler. Excellent logic on your part. I for one, am damned tired of the corrupt in our gov getting a pass when the uncorrupt in our Armed Services make the same kind of mistake Hillary is caught doing get Leavenworth KS.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law

Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?

The server was never lost.

Yep I am a bad typer

Better than being a shill cheering for corruption

It is possible to be both.

It's also possible to be more transparently and ubiquitously wrong than you are about pretty much everything. Improbable but possible.

a reply to: The GUT

Oh, don't be so silly, you know there's at least one more consistently wrong...

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: The GUT

Oh, don't be so silly, you know there's at least one more consistently wrong...

Naaah, that would be "Silly"...

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law

Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?

The server was never lost.

Yep I am a bad typer

Better than being a shill cheering for corruption

It is possible to be both.

It's also possible to be more transparently and ubiquitously wrong than you are about pretty much everything. Improbable but pose.

Thank you for proving my point.

originally posted by: samuelsson

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: soberbacchus

What they said was she did in fact do it, but because they thought she did not really mean it they would not prosecute. The investigation conclusion was in fact she did it though, that the wrongdoing did occur.

Wow.

Move on.

Sad, desperate, OBSSESED.

Investigation over, no charges.

You just lost all credability in my eyes. Obviously another anti trump circle jerk.

We needed another one of those

I don't know you and don't give a crap about you think about my credibility?

Reality has my back, while this is just another OP premised on BS in defense of a liar that you worship.

I'd have to lie consistently in order to earn "credibility" from the likes of you. Disgusting, morally bankrupt...sad and desperate.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law

Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?

The server was never lost.

Yep I am a bad typer

Better than being a shill cheering for corruption

It is possible to be both.

It's also possible to be more transparently and ubiquitously wrong than you are about pretty much everything. Improbable but pose.

Thank you for proving my point.

Wow, how embassingly dishonest you are. Did you change my quote to "pose" instead of "possible?"

There's no edit on my post. Don't worry: I won't go running to tattle to a mod like you are so often prone to do.

Talk about proving someone's point!

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: soberbacchus

What they said was she did in fact do it, but because they thought she did not really mean it they would not prosecute. The investigation conclusion was in fact she did it though, that the wrongdoing did occur.

Wow.

Move on.

Sad, desperate, OBSSESED.

Investigation over, no charges.

Tell that to Manafort...
Double standard much???

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: The GUT

Oh, don't be so silly, you know there's at least one more consistently wrong...

I did qualify it and say it was possible J & C. But you do have a point as improbable as the proposition was.

Dont you people get it?
Clintons lawyers, Mills and Samuelson
Went through Clintons emails, removed any emails they said were ''personal'' then handed them to State.

Once this was done, the FBI gave Mills and Samuelson wide ranging immunity. Comey told congress, they were given immunity if anything found on the laptop was criminal, but that was a lie. They were given immunity for EVERYTHING related to the Clinton investigation.

the FBI also allowed Mills and Samuelson to sit in on Clinton's FBI questioning.

Ignore the fact Comey draft Clintons exhoneration letter months before even interviewing Clinton..
Ignore the fact that Mccabe, Strzok and Page were involved in investigating Clinton while also helping Comey edit his exhoneration
Ignore the fact that Clinton stated many times '' no emails were classified, no work emails were sent to the server '' and that was false
Ignore the fact that the email server, blackberries, mobile phones, simcards, sd cards, ipads were all wiped
Ignore the fact that the BACKUPS for all those devices were wiped by Platte River Networks
and ignore the fact that when Platte River was questioned, they all took the 5th

and now... the FBI admits its lost chain of custody for Clintons Server..

With all that in mind, if you still sit there and believe Clinton was innocent and this is a wake investigation.. I honestly say you are deliberately spreading false information. You are a liar and a traitor and you deserve a space in the gallows

a reply to: soberbacchus
There's no way to prosecute whoever hacked the server now that the server can't be used for prosecution. Shouldn't that make Hillary supporters mad?

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: soberbacchus

What they said was she did in fact do it, but because they thought she did not really mean it they would not prosecute. The investigation conclusion was in fact she did it though, that the wrongdoing did occur.

Wow.

Move on.

Sad, desperate, OBSSESED.

Investigation over, no charges.

The razor was sharp and he cut you with this one. He is spot on 100%. No way you can say move on when they said she actually did the crimes that others have been incarcerated for doing.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law

Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?

The server was never lost.

Yep I am a bad typer

Better than being a shill cheering for corruption

It is possible to be both.

It's also possible to be more transparently and ubiquitously wrong than you are about pretty much everything. Improbable but pose.

Thank you for proving my point.

But you just had to stay the course and BE silly.

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: The GUT

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hilarious though that all of you anti trumpers no so little about the law

Well, at least we "know" how to spell the word "know"?

The server was never lost.

Yep I am a bad typer

Better than being a shill cheering for corruption

It is possible to be both.

It's also possible to be more transparently and ubiquitously wrong than you are about pretty much everything. Improbable but pose.

Thank you for proving my point.

Wow, how embassingly dishonest you are. Did you change my quote to "pose" instead of "possible?"

There's no edit on my post. Don't worry: I won't go running to tattle to a mod like you are so often prone to do.

Talk about proving someone's point!

Wow. You are using an obvious autocorrect error against someone who disagrees with you. Talk about grasping at straws....

originally posted by: SouthernForkway26
a reply to: soberbacchus
There's no way to prosecute whoever hacked the server now that the server can't be used for prosecution. Shouldn't that make Hillary supporters mad?

The physical server is irrelevant. Shouldn't that make Russian hackers mad?

originally posted by: DJW001
The physical server is irrelevant. Shouldn't that make Russian hackers mad?

How the hell do you come to the conclusion Hillary's email server is irrelevant?

originally posted by: Agit8dChop

originally posted by: DJW001
The physical server is irrelevant. Shouldn't that make Russian hackers mad?

How the hell do you come to the conclusion Hillary's email server is irrelevant?

I am responding to the member who suggested that "Clinton supporters" should be disappointed because the server could not be used to discover the identity of the hackers who stole the emails. Do try to keep up.

originally posted by: SouthernForkway26
a reply to: soberbacchus
There's no way to prosecute whoever hacked the server now that the server can't be used for prosecution. Shouldn't that make Hillary supporters mad?

Nothing personal, but this is a great example of the BRAIN ROT the right wing suffers after years of propaganda.

Listen Carefully. It might blow your mind.

There was no evidence found what-so-ever that HRCs Server was ever hacked.

Reality.