CNN's Chris Cuomo Gets "Owned" By Israeli's Netanyahu During Interview

Chris Cuomo interviewed Benjamin Netanyahu on CNN yesterday and did his best to bolster the 2015 Iranium Nuclear Deal. Cuomo stated that the International Atomic Energy Agency had no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons after 2009. He also stated that Netanyahu's speech, which revealed Iran had a secret nuclear weapons archive, was "unusally theatrical" and odd, because of the speech being said in "English."

Netanyahu stated that the uncovered documents, proved Iran hid nuclear knowledge, blueprints and a capability to develop nuclear weaponry. He states that the Iranium Nuclear Deal is bad because:
... Iran is not a peaceful nation and in 7 years will be able to enrich uranium for nuclear weaponry
...didn't address Iran's ballistic missile capabilities
...didn't accout for Iran's "secret" knowledge of developing nuclear weapons

I think Netanyahu made good points...that Cuomo didn't care to discuss, because he couldn't dispute them. The Prime Minister stated that Iran has used "billions" of dollars facilitated by the Obama administration to:
...conquer Yemen
...fire rockets at Saudia Arabia
...colonize Syria militarily
...arm Hezbollah with dangerous weapons
...call for Israel's annilihation
...spread it's totalitarianism throughout the Middle East
...oppress it's own people living in Iran

Cuomo then interjects that the 2015 Nuclear Deal is better than nothing. Netanyahu didn't back down and stated Iran will never become a "docile neighbor" and the deal will not guarantee a safer and moderate Iran. Cuomo, probably realizing that the Prime Minister was making him look foolish, then taunted Netanyahu about not disclosing Israel's nuclear program.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Just a PR campaign for that PoS brought to you by sponsored "news" media.

The IAEA did state that there was no evidence, what else should Cuomo have needed to add. The onus is then up to Netanyahu to make his case...so did he, how convincing is Netanyahu for instance?

A far cry from being 'owned' methinks.

a reply to: smurfy

It's my opinion that Netanyahu was very convincing. Cuomo has always been a cocky and beligerent host methinks.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

“Owned”? OR just really good at whataboutism?

a reply to: shawmanfromny

If Nutty Yahoo is your hero then I think you should pick better idols mate, and if you think "owning" a CNN journo is cool then I think you need to re-evaluate the situation, it's one idiot trying to be smart to another idiot

CUOMO is a heathen.

originally posted by: smurfy
The IAEA did state that there was no evidence, what else should Cuomo have needed to add. The onus is then up to Netanyahu to make his case...so did he, how convincing is Netanyahu for instance?

A far cry from being 'owned' methinks.

It's best to consider any claim on a thread or news article claiming "such and such gets owned" isn't going to happen. What you really should consider said titles to be saying is "Here is a clickbait title I came up with to sensationalize this interview to get more clicks".

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Netanyahu is clutching at straws , his big performance fell flat now he falls back to fearmongering on supposed intent.
Poor sad Bibi.


Not "Owned"

Our entire media and a lot of our dual-citizen politicians are already owned by him.

Great thing, a media mouthpiece in a discussion w/another media mouthpiece, if anybody cared, they might ask "which one is which?..." But 'they' don't so 'they' didn't...


Good thing it wasn't versa-visa or it'd cost the U.S. Taxpayer BILLION$$$ but seeing that NuttinButaYahoo™ was declared 'the winner', again.... the Mother of ALL rhetoricals: WHO CARES? Just as long as the Zionist™ didn't milk the US Taxpayer for any $$$ ...

originally posted by: Mandroid7
Our entire media and a lot of our dual-citizen politicians are already owned by him.

Correct. Don't forget taxpayers as well, unwittingly footing the bill for Zionist genocide and eugenics programs around the world.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Good points yes...isn't it funny how Iran and Israel are interchangeable in those points?

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

Where did I state he was my "hero" or my "idol?' I stated that Netanyahu made good points in the interview. I don't need to re-evaluate anything...YOU should re-evaluate how you make ill advised assumptions based on someone's opinion mate....else you start to look like a troll.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

CNN lover? Liberal? Anti-Zionist? Since you say I'm a sensationist who posts threads for clicks, I might as well play the part. Just what did I say that was inaccurate, or do you have a soft spot for beligerent news anchors, who themselves are responsible for shoddy and sensationalized reports?

a reply to: shawmanfromny

I thought I was clear on that point? But ok I'll spell out the sensational part of your posting:

CNN's Chris Cuomo Gets "Owned" By Israeli's Netanyahu During Interview

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I guess its an opinion...which is subjective.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

That's my opinion...so sorry you're offended with my title. The only thing you seem to be really good at is belittling other people's comments or threads, because of course, you're right and know it all. Pathetic.

a reply to: RickyD

Where did I say it wasn't an opinion? Stating someone getting "owned" in an interview is sensationalism is also an opinion. Funny how that works, huh?

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Where did you get the idea I was offended? Disagreement != offense. Though you sound AWFULLY offended at my words.