"Q" is the equivalent of Sorcha Faal and you deserve to be made fun of

a reply to: JosephKnecht

Thank you for stating the obvious, but the cultists will refuse to hear you.

a reply to: JosephKnecht

Zzzzzzz

This thread stinks of I'm jealous and my team is getting battered like a fish

originally posted by: TritonTaranis
This thread stinks of I'm jealous and my team is getting battered like a fish

Nah, it's more like "I can't believe ATSers can get strung along like that".

originally posted by: TritonTaranis
a reply to: JosephKnecht

Zzzzzzz

This thread stinks of I'm jealous and my team is getting battered like a fish

Please provide one single example of an unambiguous statement by Q that turned out to be true.

a reply to: humanoidlord

That's a stretch of a reason there though. If some white supremacist told someone they liked me because I border security is a problem, that doesn't mean we hold all the same views. Everyone knows Trump likes younger woman based off his marriages alone. always like 10 years younger than the last. You can't control what others say about you or endorse you.

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: sooth
This is just my hypothesis, but I suspect that one day Q will be revealed to be some professor or a group of students led by a professor at some university like Yale or Princeton. The timing at which Q came about after the mass awareness and exposure of "fake news" combined with Q's obviously very deliberate target audience feels very specific to me. I think Q has an agenda, but I don't think it is what Q's followers think it is.

Q has direct access to the president. .

What information did you get from Q that proves he has direct access to the President?

Be specific, and explain how only someone with direct access to the President could have known the information.

Again: be specific.

Why should I do your research for you? If you have been following the Q threads you would know how Q is directly connected. We've been over it a 100 times and I don't feel like holding the hand of another troll to show them something that is easily verified.

BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM. YOU. You have said that Q has released information tha proves he is an insider with direct access to the President. I am saying that your claim is not true. You want me to prove a negative? Hint: people cannot prove a negative.

The reason you are not backing up your claim is because you can NOT, and you know it.

Otherwise, you would post the proof. You would be happy to post the proof! But you don't have it.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: TritonTaranis
a reply to: JosephKnecht

Zzzzzzz

This thread stinks of I'm jealous and my team is getting battered like a fish

Please provide one single example of an unambiguous statement by Q that turned out to be true.

They will not do it. Some of us have been asking since page 1. They respond by saying they shouldn't have to do the research for you. Or they say proof is a picture supposedly taken from Air Force One but don't address how it's proved that the picture was taken from that specific plane. I guess they don't have the type of brain cells required to realize that anyone with a camera can take a photo from any airplane.

a reply to: Boadicea

I want even going to bother with this thread but I had to give you major mad props for this post and all subsequent.

Hey there MME, good to know you're still lurking about the borders of Q land. There certainly have been quite a few interesting bits of info and connections made throughout the massive amount of posts across all 6 threads, haven't there?

Regardless, its been hell of a ride.

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: sooth
This is just my hypothesis, but I suspect that one day Q will be revealed to be some professor or a group of students led by a professor at some university like Yale or Princeton. The timing at which Q came about after the mass awareness and exposure of "fake news" combined with Q's obviously very deliberate target audience feels very specific to me. I think Q has an agenda, but I don't think it is what Q's followers think it is.

Q has direct access to the president. .

What information did you get from Q that proves he has direct access to the President?

Be specific, and explain how only someone with direct access to the President could have known the information.

Again: be specific.

Why should I do your research for you? If you have been following the Q threads you would know how Q is directly connected. We've been over it a 100 times and I don't feel like holding the hand of another troll to show them something that is easily verified.

BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING THE CLAIM. YOU. You have said that Q has released information tha proves he is an insider with direct access to the President. I am saying that your claim is not true. You want me to prove a negative? Hint: people cannot prove a negative.

The reason you are not backing up your claim is because you can NOT, and you know it.

Otherwise, you would post the proof. You would be happy to post the proof! But you don't have it.

Just quoting myself to remind all that carcharadon STILL hasn't responded to my response. Still hasn't provided the evidence that Q has direct access to the President, as that member claims.

CRICKETS.

a reply to: KansasGirl

Why so angry? If you think Q is ridiculous then why not just ignore it and move on? I dont think youre going to get 100% proof of anything until Q comes out and reveals themself/selves personally. They actually did post once that at some point we will find out and have a good laugh about it..

Most people in the Q threads are skeptical, but enjoy the rabbit hole anyway. Some dig waaaay deep, while others stick closer to the surface. Regardless of what Q really is, the entertainment value is interesting.

I just dont get the level of anger coming from some of you over this. I agree some of the super involved members can be smug at times, but who cares? If you think something smells, wouldnt it make more sense to walk away from it rather than continue to linger around the bad odor, torturing yourself?

Anyway, rant on. I just dont get it.

a reply to: Wookiep

Because the MO around here is that people who make claims are expected to back them up.

So it is one thing to say, "hey Q might be on to something" and another to say "Q has proven himself". If you want to claim the later then you should expect a reminder to show that proof.

If you think something smells, wouldnt it make more sense to walk away from it rather than continue to linger around the bad odor, torturing yourself?

That wouldn't be very ATS like.

a reply to: JosephKnecht


It doesn’t surprise me that all the much smarter, sharper people here at ATS think that Q is a fake.

But honestly, I’ve hardly been to ATS in months because I’ve been spending all my time on Twitter following Q.

I can’t tell you how nice it’s been to hang around a bunch of true patriots for a change, who love America, and have found a reason to band together and fight for a common cause. It sure beats coming to ATS, starting a post, and having a troll waiting in the wings to post the first negative, sarcastic comment right after I hit the send button.

Q has red pilled many, many people, and if his real name is Daffy Duck, I don’t care.

I’ve been studying the New World Order for more than ten years. It’s been a life-changing thing for me to be a part of the Q movement where love of this great country is first and foremost in everyone’s minds, where we are united by a purpose.

If Q’s a guy sitting in his parents’ basement, I don’t care. Nope, I don’t care one bit.

There are people working full time putting things together—-Uranium One, North Korea, the 2016 campaign, the truth about Obama...and I could go on. I’ve learned a lot—-more than I can explain— and enjoyed the process. Figuring out this NWO has been part of my life for a long time.

So, if Q is a dog named Stanley...I don’t care.

You see, the point isn’t about who Q is. The point is about bringing people together and caring about the truth of what is happening to this once-great country.

He’s not dividing democrats and republicans. He hates John McCain as much as he hates Obama.

Nope, this is a good guy versus bad guy war, just as it has always been.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to find like-minded people over on Twitter.

It’s kind of refreshing.

Wookiep...MRuss...

a reply to: UnendingVigilance

but knowing the source, its very suspicious

a reply to: MRuss

It doesn't matter to you that those patriots might be sitting in a sweatshop in St. Petersburg, Russia?

originally posted by: MRuss
You see, the point isn’t about who Q is.

That is true but for some it is important if his drops are the truth or just red "sugar" pills.

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: KansasGirl

Why so angry? If you think Q is ridiculous then why not just ignore it and move on? I dont think youre going to get 100% proof of anything until Q comes out and reveals themself/selves personally. They actually did post once that at some point we will find out and have a good laugh about it..

Most people in the Q threads are skeptical, but enjoy the rabbit hole anyway. Some dig waaaay deep, while others stick closer to the surface. Regardless of what Q really is, the entertainment value is interesting.

I just dont get the level of anger coming from some of you over this. I agree some of the super involved members can be smug at times, but who cares? If you think something smells, wouldnt it make more sense to walk away from it rather than continue to linger around the bad odor, torturing yourself?

Anyway, rant on. I just dont get it.

I'm not sure I'm coming across as angry, Wookie. Why so sensitive to direct questions?

Because that's what I've done, is ask direct questions. And then I've pointed out when the questions were not answered.

i asked the member what evidence they had to support their claim that Q has direct access to the President. The member responded by telling me they shouldn't have to do my research for me. Even though they were the ones making the claim...meaning the duty is on them to back up their claim.

They didn't respond to that, which is a type of response in itself (showing that they don't have any evidence). What's the problem you have with my holding them accountable to their claims?

Because (and this answers your question about why don't I just ignore the threads) these people are the reason the truth community is a joke in society. A complete joke which will never be taken seriously as long as its got these folks who will fall for hoaxes and psyops like this Q business and then defend it to the bitter death no matter how much evidence piles up that they're being taken for a ride.

There really are issues that We the People are being systematically lied to about, and manipulated with. If we could all pull together we MIGHT have a chance at at least exposing some of it. UNLESS we fall for little schemes like this Q, and that's probably precisely the point of this Q.

But I do agree with you that what I say or don't say in these threads makes zero difference. You'll get no argument from me there. Sometimes I just type anyway.

a reply to: JosephKnecht

At this point, when I see people posting Q, I question their sanity and pity them for how far rock bottom they have hit

At this point, when I see people posting Russiagate/anti-Trump conspiracy theories, I question their sanity and pity them for how far rock bottom they have hit.

Hi guys,

This "Q" phenomenon - I suspect I know the identity of this individual - though I am not 100% sure that that is who you are referring to.

If that "individual", were to somehow have their identity exposed - do you imagine that the individual would have his/her safety compromised.

Is it even possible to have someone disclose "Q"s identity here and manage to arrange to prove it? For instance, if you were to directly contact said person as a personality here on ATS.

- SensibleSenseless -

a reply to: sensibleSenseless

If you are hinting that QAnon includes ATS members who are using this site to further their [HOAX!] you are 100% correct. You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes figure out which habitues of 4Chan are responsible for wasting ATS bandwiidth on this nonsense.