Child is killed during school walk out against gun violence

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

The kids WANT to protest. It’s their way of speaking out. They WANT to be heard.

All the other things you listed are also being looked at. By the adults.

You are talking about 11 year olds

What next?

Can we have preschoolers marching out of school or daycare to the streets for whatever political cause they favor?

And I guess we would have people blaming these 4 year olds to for leaving designated areas if they get hit hy traffic as opposed to the schools or daycares that are supposed to be looking after them

a reply to: ridgerunner

Apparently the kid in the OP wasn’t afraid to cross a busy highway. Maybe he should have been?

a reply to: Grambler
Grambler

And I guess we would have people blaming these 4 year olds to for leaving designated areas if they get hit hy traffic as opposed to the schools or daycares that are supposed to be looking after them

kaylaluv

Apparently the kid in the OP wasn’t afraid to cross a busy highway. Maybe he should have been?

@Gambler, here you have it. Didn´t take long.

a reply to: Grambler

11 years old is not too young to get a bullet to the head while in school. The kids at Sandy Hook were 6 and 7 years old.

The left is sacrificing children for their "cause" of protecting children.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler

11 years old is not too young to get a bullet to the head while in school. The kids at Sandy Hook were 6 and 7 years old.

And here we have it!

So you are for 6 and 7 year olds walking out of school to protest politically

And if they die because the are not being supervised so be it right?

originally posted by: kaylaluv

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

The kids WANT to protest. It’s their way of speaking out. They WANT to be heard.

All the other things you listed are also being looked at. By the adults.

Kids want candy for dinner too.

The right to eat candy is not in the Constitution, but the right to assembly is.

For people over 18, yes. For those under 18 that right is contingent upon parental consent.

Im assuming all participants here had consent from their respective parents.

The reason that children arent given the full rights of an adult are somewhat highlighted by the story in the OP

originally posted by: DBCowboy
The left is sacrificing children for their "cause" of protecting children.

Some people are so funny

All you have to do is leave them talk and eventually the truth comes out

Now we have a person advocating 6 year olds staging school walkouts and taking to the streets

And literally no comprehension of how insane that is

a reply to: Grambler

So you are okay with kids getting shot and killed in schools. As long as everybody gets to have a gun, so be it right?

Do you even notice how desperate you are making a point that you write stuff like:

11 years old is not too young to get a bullet to the head while in school. The kids at Sandy Hook were 6 and 7 years old.

What in the hell is wrong with you. What logical connection is there, between them getting shot and not being mature enough to grasp most decisions they make?

Really, get a grip are you not ashamed of your own tactics? All show and no substance! You revealed your true self, congratulations!!!!

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler

So you are okay with kids getting shot and killed in schools. As long as everybody gets to have a gun, so be it right?

This statement is predicated on the lie that banning guns would eliminate school shootings.

And it ignores all other forms of violence, as if stabbings and bombings arent violence.

A double whammy of logical failure.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler

So you are okay with kids getting shot and killed in schools. As long as everybody gets to have a gun, so be it right?

Yes yes I know. Anyone who doesn’t totally agree with you is for kids getting shot

Where have I anywhere on this thread mentioned peoples rights to guns?

I said I would be against them walking out of school to protest anything even things I agree with

You are now making the absolute insane statement that anyone that disagrees with your belief that 6 year olds should walkout of schools and take to the streets for political protests is ok with kids getting shot

Please keep going

Your every post is further insight into the dangers of extremism

a reply to: Grambler

Yes yes I know. Anyone who is okay with middle schoolers protesting is saying they think first graders should be out protesting unsupervised on a busy highway.

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler

Yes yes I know. Anyone who is okay with middle schoolers protesting is saying they think first graders should be out protesting unsupervised on a busy highway.

Need I quote you?

I said you were cheering for 11 year olds to do this, and next people would be saying preschoolers

You said 6 year olds have reason to fear guns and protest

But fine you are clarifying

What age is the acceptable cut off for you to cheer for them walking out of school and taking to the streets?

Clearly you are ok with 11

So is it 10 year olds or are you willing to go younger?

a reply to: Grambler

Middle School is not too young to be taught that as citizens, they have the right to peacefully assemble. There is nothing wrong with this lesson. What was wrong, was that the kids weren’t properly supervised. Inadequate supervision would be wrong no matter what the circumstances were: field trip, P.E., protest, etc.

Debate Civilly!!!!

All rules for polite debate will be enforced.
Community Announcement re: Decorum
Go After the Ball, Not the Player!


You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

a reply to: Grambler

I never said that 6 year olds should be on the street protesting. I said 6 year olds got shot, so an 11 year old could get shot too.

There are some who think 11 years old is old enough to shoot a gun, but they don’t think 11 years old is old enough to peacefully assemble? What age is too young to handle a gun? I’ll say whatever age that is, that’s the age that’s too young to peacefully assemble.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

How many mass stabbing and bombings in U.S. schools lately? How many mass shootings in schools lately?

a reply to: kaylaluv

So you are okay with kids getting shot and killed in schools. As long as everybody gets to have a gun, so be it right?

In the first place, Grambler never said that. You did.

In the second place, please stop trying to act like you care about children dying. It's sickening. You certainly do not care about a child getting enough supervision to be safe, so why would you care about children being shot? BFFT has tried several times to talk to you about overall violence, and you reject the idea every time.

Your political agenda is as obvious as a flashing neon sign mounted over your head. For you, it's all about taking away guns... no matter how many people die, no matter how many children die, no matter how many parents mourn, it's all collateral damage in your mission from God Himself to get those damn guns!

And that is simply inhuman... dare i say psychotic?

TheRedneck

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Grambler

Middle School is not too young to be taught that as citizens, they have the right to peacefully assemble. There is nothing wrong with this lesson. What was wrong, was that the kids weren’t properly supervised. Inadequate supervision would be wrong no matter what the circumstances were: field trip, P.E., protest, etc.

Which is exactly what I said in the op

The problem is that it is near impossible to properly supervise a schools full of children walking out to the streets, as is evident in this walkout and many others

Therefore the school that facilitated this walkout is responsible for this tragedy