-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

a reply to: pavil

Please quit replying to members who show no interest in Q and are just here to discredit us. It's just not worth it.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Please quit replying to members who show no interest in Q and are just here to discredit us. It's just not worth it.

That was just a tad dictatorial. What happens if they don't, do they get sent to re-education camp?

ETA: That is pretty discrediting all on its own.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

I got my list handy to write them all down. I added pics from the pdf for those who didn't want to download.

DevinNunes

He is already aware that O refused to prosecute Manafort because of his shady Ukraine deals back in the day. Buckle up.

Hey PE I sent you a PM.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Mueller is losing it.

Mueller Indicted A Russian Company That Didn't Even Exist, Court Transcripts Say

This week, one of the Russian companies accused by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of funding a conspiracy to meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election was revealed in court to not have existed during the time period alleged by Mueller's team of prosecutors, according to a lawyer representing the Defendant.

U.S. Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey asked Eric Dubelier, one of two lawyers representing the accused Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, if he was representing a third company listed in Mueller's indictment.

"What about Concord Catering?" Harvey asked Dubelier. "The government makes an allegation that there's some association. I don't mean for you to – do you represent them, or not, today? And are we arraigning them as well?"

"We're not," Dubelier responded. "And the reason for that, Your Honor, is I think we're dealing with a situation of the government having indicted the proverbial ham sandwich."

"That company didn't exist as a legal entity during the time period alleged by the government," Dubelier continued. "If at some later time they show me that it did exist, we would probably represent them. But for purposes of today, no, we do not."

Ouchie !!

Big boondoggle

😁

a reply to: wanderingconfusion

NXIVM sure "Branded" their companies, didn't they?

Im sure we have only scratched the surface with them.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
I'm not picking sides, but InfoWars are going to pay a heavy price for tossing out disinfo about Q and Q's continuing mission which isn't separate from Trump and the secret war going on behind the scenes as we stand on the cusp of some big winning.

Not smart.

They should have framed it very differently.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
The Q movement must be just exploding exponentially.

Don't you see? Alex Jones denouncing Q is the next step in Q's ascendancy.

Of course Lefties and Normies already disslike AJ from YEARS of negative programming. Do people expect that they and public are ready to adopt the ways of InfoWars and their hated leader AJ???

NFW. It's not a technical policy matter or philosophical difference that separates Q from the "old school" conspiracy warriors, it's better business for Q if these guys reject him. Q's popularity rose to a certain level from becoming part of their dialogue, but now is restrained from mainstream success by these same factions.

My wife calls it "The David Duke Endorsement", Q can live without it.

OH no's looks like McStain was in on the FBI spy plot also.

Better grab your popcorn cause it is breaking loose.

New Evidence Shows McCain Helped Fund FBI Plot to Frame Trump; Backed Bogus Russian Trump Dossier

link

a reply to: pavil

In more ways than one. All those tentacles are getting exposed now that the AG of NY is out on his ear. I just wish more people would pay attention to this news and stop all the fighting. It's depressing.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
OH no's looks like McStain was in on the FBI spy plot also.

Better grab your popcorn cause it is breaking loose.

New Evidence Shows McCain Helped Fund FBI Plot to Frame Trump; Backed Bogus Russian Trump Dossier

link

The article is 7 months old.

a reply to: djohn554

Doh

a reply to: djohn554

I'm sorry. This is the first time I read it. I didn't check the date but I guess True Pundit was on top of the game way back then.

a reply to: Phage

Just because the article is 7 months old doesn't make the info any less valid my friend.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
Just because the article is 7 months old doesn't make the info any less valid my friend.

True but it steals the thunder from your call for popcorn because "it is breaking loose".

a reply to: WhatTheory

On a gut instinct, I compared the picture in Q Post #1344 with the original post it portrays.

The picture in #1344 shows a time 3 hours earlier (20:29:38) than the EST time of 23:29:38 shown in the Q map stores of posts.

I don't think it illuminates much other than that Q team are 3 hours west of EST time zone. That n turn may have implications on any time/tweet comparisons we do, or manipulations.

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
a reply to: Phage

Just because the article is 7 months old doesn't make the info any less valid my friend.

Very true!!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Great find

originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
NXIVM case is spreading out into financial crimes now. They have discovered 90 companies and entities. OH boy!

BOMBSHELL! It looks like the DOJ's case against Raniere & Mack may be expanding to financial crimes! The prosecution has revealed in a court filing that they are aware of ninety [90] companies or entities!

warning a pdf

I posted many of these many pages back (in THIS thread...or maybe the end of the last).

a reply to: IAMTAT

We also setup pages for each of those NXIVM companies in the Q-Wiki - could have done with access to that now.