-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

a reply to: proximo

Oh, I don't know. I'd say that the release of hostages from NK might seem somewhat MOABish to their family members

Success.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Possible the resident intel community saw Bill Cooper and created Alex jones in his image, but beholden to the existing hierarchy.

North Korea will receive US economic assistance if it gives up nuclear weapons, Pompeo says

Basically, what the U.S. told N. Korea is we will give up nothing and you have the chance to prosper and flourish like S. Korea. That is really an awesome incentive.

a reply to: Skyfloating

Nothing worse than an animal raper ✴️

a reply to: Skyfloating

And while in prison, he can work as a porter 🔆🚬

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Rosinitiate

Possible the resident intel community saw Bill Cooper and created Alex jones in his image, but beholden to the existing hierarchy.

Personally I think they flipped him way back. Perhaps even before he was remotely known in the mainstream. Pre-Bohemian Grove.

They did the same thing to Rogan.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: proximo

Oh, I don't know. I'd say that the release of hostages from NK might seem somewhat MOABish to their family members

It could all be just as fake for all we know. It caught my attention that one or two were only imprisoned for about a year.

That's like within this administration. Convenient.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

III=turd

Reality Check.

1. Go to Hillary Clintons twitter Account.

2. Click the first pinned tweet (the one about little girls)

3. Notice that almost EVERY SINGLE ONE of the first hundred responses (I didnt read further than that) is by redpilled citizens.

4. Go to MSM, Wikipedia or Google. Notice that almost NOT A SINGLE ARTICLE is from a redpilled viewpoint and in many cases comments are locked.

5. Conclusion: WE THE PEOPLE know. And MSM, Google, Wikipedia, etc. are complicit in the cover-up. Never before in History has there been such a divide between the "official version of reality" and what we the people know.

a reply to: WhatTheory

Bill Clinton rewarded NK with billions of dollars for giving up their desire to be a nuke country.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: WhatTheory

Bill Clinton rewarded NK with billions of dollars for giving up their desire to be a nuke country.

Sorry, I'm probably drunk but what is your point?

originally posted by: Skyfloating
3. Notice that almost EVERY SINGLE ONE of the first hundred responses (I didnt read further than that) is by redpilled citizens.

Is there a special way to read them because I got to 11 before someone posted something showing their support?

I would also like to say, as someone who has been called things for not buying into the whole Q thing, you sure seem to be OK with people trolling when it fits the agenda.

I've been thinking about the recent Q drops and what they may portend.

For this exercise, who is best suited to deliver the message?

A press conference needs to be held. The Presenter will say something like: Here we have 40 thousand documents, witness statements, signed affidavits and confessions detailing a FBI, DOJ and outsider plot to kill president Trump. We have detailed reports of eight attempted actions taken since his election. We have more detailed reports due out that will demonstrate conclusive connections to HRC and BHO who, in collusion with other global leaders, sought to maintain power until president trump was removed.

Now, given the media and a large percentage of the global population would see trumps death as a godsend, who delivers the message so that "well he made this up to protect himself, the docs are forged, he's a liar" is not really possible? Who can deliver the message so that the naysayers have no real choice but to look at the docs with open eyes?

Anyone? DJT = no. Session = no. Who is credible with the rabid DJT haters enough that a delivery of the information must be seen as credible?

I see one possibility.

originally posted by: crankyoldman


I see one possibility.

Hillary?



ETA, seriously now: Mueller. The other side is also getting impatient, as in "Why is Mueller not FINALLY cracking down on Trump?"

a reply to: Skyfloating

bravo!
i notice this too, people know! Q said it in a post recently, 70% awake,

look how many were watching live at 2am when the hostages came back, this nation is full of patriots! and we are taking our country back from foreign influence and corruption.

everyone will see it soon enough, for now its wonderful enough to know we are the majority. there is no stopping us now.

originally posted by: daskakik

Is there a special way to read them because I got to 11 before someone posted something showing their support?

1 Hillary supporter out of 11 non-supporters? Thats not even nine percent. Thanks for confirming.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
1 Hillary supporter out of 11 non-supporters? Thats not even one percent. Thanks or confirming.

I didn't say that was the only one, that was just the first, which was way sooner than your claimed 100. Sorry but your claim was off.

ETA: Your math is off too. 1 out of 11 is nine percent.

a reply to: 0bserver1

No offence taken... my reply was just trying to explain my approach.. happy to be challenged - as I should be!

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Living with his parents at 44 is subjective and not relevant.

However, posting anti-Q every 5 mins is much more relevant.