It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is with regret and concern that we, the Leaders of France, Germany and the United Kingdom take note of President Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States of America from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
Together, we emphasise our continuing commitment to the JCPoA. This agreement remains important for our shared security. We recall that the JCPoA was unanimously endorsed by the UN Security Council in resolution 2231. This resolution remains the binding international legal framework for the resolution of the dispute about the Iranian nuclear programme. We urge all sides to remain committed to its full implementation and to act in a spirit of responsibility.
According to the IAEA, Iran continues to abide by the restrictions set out by the JCPoA, in line with its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The world is a safer place as a result. Therefore we, the E3, will remain parties to the JCPoA. Our governments remain committed to ensuring the agreement is upheld, and will work with all the remaining parties to the deal to ensure this remains the case including through ensuring the continuing economic benefits to the Iranian people that are linked to the agreement.
We urge the US to ensure that the structures of the JCPoA can remain intact, and to avoid taking action which obstructs its full implementation by all other parties to the deal. After engaging with the US Administration in a thorough manner over the past months, we call on the US to do everything possible to preserve the gains for nuclear non-proliferation brought about by the JCPoA, by allowing for a continued enforcement of its main elements.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
Schneiderman was a roadblock for both of those cases and can now be replaced with a white hat!
How can anyone be sure that he will be replaced by a white hat?
originally posted by: Enderdog
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: carewemust
Excerpted from #1319 @ qanon.pub...
Why is the NY AG resignation important?
What past/current 'high profile' FBI investigations are within the jurisdiction of NY?
Define roadblock.
You have more than you know.
WHY is Schneiderman's resignation more important than what we know?
Wiener Laptop files.
On Kilmeade, this morning, Brian reported on a five year old tweet by Prez the Donald, that names Schneiderman, Weiner and Baker (I think) as being gone. He called him Nostradamus...this seems almost impossible to me, unless it's a timeline thing. The tweet was in present tense language.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
Schneiderman was a roadblock for both of those cases and can now be replaced with a white hat!
How can anyone be sure that he will be replaced by a white hat?
They cant really. And oddly enough, Loretta Lynch is considered a potential in the November election now.
Ousted New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman will be replaced by current Solicitor General Barbara Underwood after he suddenly resigned Monday night.
Underwood, who has served as Solicitor General since 2007, was a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and has argued 20 cases before the Supreme Court.
Schneiderman — whose office became known for its work against sexual harassment and was prosecuting Harvey Weinstein — was immediately asked by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to step down after The New Yorker published a report Monday in which four women accused him of physical abuse.
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
Never a guarantee, but you'd have to imagine anyone would be more beneficial. Schneiderman WAS a roadblock. In fact, just a month ago ( April 9 ) he suspended the NXIVM probe..
www.timesunion.com...
originally posted by: djohn554
Can't stand Shep Smith.
He keeps reiterating that we can't "legally pull out" of the agreement - we will be "violating" it's terms.
Human leather is made from real full thickness human skin. Just like animal leather products, produced from lesser animals, our raw human skin is transformed into the finest grade human leather by using a traditional tanning process. However, human leather is the finest grain leather that is obtainable.
It is free from defects and has the smallest grain size which makes it the smoothest, softest leather on Earth.
...
Why are your products so expensive?
We cater to a small but highly discerning clientele. They are amongst those lucky few who have everything they could possibly desire. Our supply is restricted and we prefer to keep it that way as we are the only firm in the world that crafts these special products.
What is the cost of a Human Leather Wallet?
From Euros 9,000 onwards (USD$14,000 approx)
What is the cost of a Human Leather Belt?
From Euros 10,500 onwards (USD$15,750 approx)
What is the cost of a pair of Human Leather Shoes?
From Euros 18,000 onwards (USD$27,000 approx)
All prices quoted above are the historical minimum that we have asked for in the past. They are for guidance only and each piece will be priced individually.
How Do I Pay?
We will give you details on how to pay, if you become a client of ours. We can go through what can be made with the material we have at the time and we ask for full payment in advance. Till date, we have never had an article returned due to defects, and we aim to retain this unblemished record.
Department of Justice does not discuss ongoing investigations or confirm specific matters,
What about the active investigation into leaks?
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Yea everyone knew he was going to pull out but the way in which he did it was awesome. Listen to the quick speech if you haven't. Lots of dual meaning.
A complete indictment of the Obama admin,. His legacy has been almost completely erased now.
As far as the Logan act, NO one has ever been charged under it. I'm doubtful it'll happen.
I'd be interested to know if there is precedent for this situation though. Has a former SecState ever gone behind a current administration's back to try and sabotage what they are doing?
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: 0bserver1
Any advice on what you think I should add to the "Unanswered Q" spreadsheet to incorporate logic programming/kill boxes will be gratefully received O1!!