-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

a reply to: Sillyolme

like Dan "Creepy White Van" Schneider?

See, at least youre enjoying the show

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Wondering if this has anything to do with Schneiderman as well.

nyeveningnews.com...

Howard Rubin, widely known as George Soros’ right hand man, has been accused of leading a “human trafficking enterprise” in which he allegedly raped, brutally assaulted and enslaved women in a $8 million Manhattan sex dungeon, according to court documents.A former Wall Street trader, Howard Rubin, 62, has been accused by three women, including two high profile Playboy bunnies, of raping and beating them in a Midtown penthouse which he allegedly rigged with ropes, chains, and other BDSM equipment.Soros’ right hand man is said to have lured dozens of women from all over the US by offering between $2000 and $5000 for ‘supposed companionship and photoshoots’ before assaulting them so brutally that they needed cosmetic and dental reconstructive surgery, according to the lawsuit…

Trump saying Schneiderman is WORSE than Wiener back in 2013...leads me to believe that Trump was planning on stopping this human/child sex trafficking for a long time.

Definitely. To produce an "emergency" executive order, just 11 months into his Presidency took some planning. White House attorneys probably had to do a lot of research, to properly word an E.O. that no prior President has even come close to issuing.

George has some great dot's in this piece

Schneiderman uses his position in politics to go after the right type of people that he can groom for a relationship before showing his dark side. Seems he likes to get plastered (s#itfaced 5 nights a week) and slap girls around and uses psychological games to keep them from understanding whats really happening. He pushes alcohol on his victims and gets them to truly believe they are worthless by forcing them to repeat shameful and belittling phrases. He uses a balance of threats and reverse psychology to keep everything under wraps. Its pretty telling that he resigned 3 hours after the first story broke.

ETA: I wonder if we will see some "sex cult" connections..

“He started calling me his ‘brown slave’ and demanding that I repeat that I was ‘his property.’” Selvaratnam said, “The slaps started after we’d gotten to know each other. “It was at first as if he were testing me. Then it got stronger and harder. It wasn’t consensual. This wasn’t sexual playacting. This was abusive, demeaning, threatening behavior.”

A friend finally helped her leave him, Selvaratnam said. Schneiderman told the mag in a statement, “In the privacy of intimate relationships, I have engaged in role-playing and other consensual sexual activity. I have not assaulted anyone. I have never engaged in nonconsensual sex, which is a line I would not cross.”

nypost.com...

“All of a sudden, he just slapped me, open-handed and with great force, across the face, landing the blow directly onto my ear,” Manning Barish says. “It was horrendous. It just came out of nowhere. My ear was ringing. I lost my balance and fell backward onto the bed. I sprang up, but at this point there was very little room between the bed and him. I got up to try to shove him back, or take a swing, and he pushed me back down. He then used his body weight to hold me down, and he began to choke me. The choking was very hard. It was really bad. I kicked. In every fibre, I felt I was being beaten by a man.” She finally freed herself and got back on her feet. “I was crying and in shock,” she says. She recalls shouting, “Are you crazy?” To her astonishment, Schneiderman accused her of scratching him. At one point—she can’t remember if it was at this moment or in a later conversation—he told her, “You know, hitting an officer of the law is a felony.”

She says that he also told her, “If you ever left me, I’d kill you.”

www.newyorker.com...

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LanceCorvette

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Iran deal is done. UK,France and Germany will not react kindly to this development. I for one am glad that this BS deal is over.

... but what I'd like to see more is all the bad actors involved with that punished. Seriously, *literal* pallets full of money transferred to a country with whom the U.S. formally had no relationship. No one in Congress asks questions; no one in Congress speaks out about it. Where does one get $400,000,000 in *cash*? How does one get that kind of money all in one place without *anyone* asking any questions or raising alarms? Where did it go, who took control over it?

And the obvious question: why?

Imagine all the good that money could have done here at home.

That money could have done some good here at home, but it wasn't our money. It was theirs and we simply gave back what they had paid many decades earlier.

Totally normal to fly hundreds of billions in untraceable cash to an enemy country that finances global terrorism.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

WTG Alex!!! You've managed to prove what a Douche and poor judge of character you are.


Lets not forget how E.S. decided not to have the CF report all it's donors like he did with other non profits. Nothing to see here........

Were Q's E S references Eric Schmidt from Google or this piece of work?

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LanceCorvette

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Iran deal is done. UK,France and Germany will not react kindly to this development. I for one am glad that this BS deal is over.

... but what I'd like to see more is all the bad actors involved with that punished. Seriously, *literal* pallets full of money transferred to a country with whom the U.S. formally had no relationship. No one in Congress asks questions; no one in Congress speaks out about it. Where does one get $400,000,000 in *cash*? How does one get that kind of money all in one place without *anyone* asking any questions or raising alarms? Where did it go, who took control over it?

And the obvious question: why?

Imagine all the good that money could have done here at home.

That money could have done some good here at home, but it wasn't our money. It was theirs and we simply gave back what they had paid many decades earlier.

Totally normal to fly hundreds of billions in untraceable cash to an enemy country that finances global terrorism.

To be honest I don't quite understand certain things about the deal to begin with ? The best I can tell it all would sort of depend on WHY the sanctions happened to begin with ? IDK, maybe someone here has a better grip on why this whole thing seems to stink to begin with ?

TRUMP, boasting about how he would have conducted talks with Iran over reducing its nuclear weapons capabilities: “I would have said sorry, we can’t give you the $150 billion back. We want to give you the money back, but we don’t have it. It’s not there.” THE FACTS: The Iranians immediately would have called Trump’s bluff. That’s because the U.S. never had $150 billion to give back in the first place. Iran had foreign assets spread across numerous banks and countries before it struck a deal with the U.S. and other countries to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions. The sanctions meant Tehran couldn’t access these funds abroad. But Iran’s government knew very well where its money was. Much of the revenue came from Iran’s oil sales to China, India, Japan and South Korea. These countries were able to purchase Iranian petroleum before the July 2015 nuclear agreement, but U.S. financial restrictions made it all but impossible to facilitate payments. So the money mainly sat in escrow in those countries, instead. These were not funds within the grasp of a U.S. president.

www.pbs.org...

I get the feeling that Session has his hands tied in the way of his ability to function . This move by Nunes must be a way to circumvent the obstruction . It becomes a Boom so to speak

Whoa! someone on the Qanon Twitter thread just posted this:



Is CNN's favorite porn star (Stormy Daniels) a NXIVM sex slave?

originally posted by: Carcharadon

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: LanceCorvette

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Iran deal is done. UK,France and Germany will not react kindly to this development. I for one am glad that this BS deal is over.

... but what I'd like to see more is all the bad actors involved with that punished. Seriously, *literal* pallets full of money transferred to a country with whom the U.S. formally had no relationship. No one in Congress asks questions; no one in Congress speaks out about it. Where does one get $400,000,000 in *cash*? How does one get that kind of money all in one place without *anyone* asking any questions or raising alarms? Where did it go, who took control over it?

And the obvious question: why?

Imagine all the good that money could have done here at home.

That money could have done some good here at home, but it wasn't our money. It was theirs and we simply gave back what they had paid many decades earlier.

Totally normal to fly hundreds of billions in untraceable cash to an enemy country that finances global terrorism.

Totally unethical to keep something that is not even yours.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Whoa! someone on the Qanon Twitter thread just posted this:

Is CNN's favorite porn star (Stormy Daniels) a NXIVM sex slave?

Link please?

You can't make this Leftist hypocrisy up.
Nosir...ya can't make it up.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Whoa! someone on the Qanon Twitter thread just posted this:

Is CNN's favorite porn star (Stormy Daniels) a NXIVM sex slave?

Link please?

It's on Twitter. I search for "Qanon" and then filter by date, so the newest replies are at the top.

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

WTG Alex!!! You've managed to prove what a Douche and poor judge of character you are.


Lets not forget how E.S. decided not to have the CF report all it's donors like he did with other non profits. Nothing to see here........

Were Q's E S references Eric Schmidt from Google or this piece of work?]/b]

Interesting question....

a reply to: IAMTAT

I don't dig this ? Does it mean that Q posts looking at the source code has coded instructions on it?

originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: IAMTAT

I don't dig this ? Does it mean that Q posts looking at the source code has coded instructions on it?

Not sure.
Posted it for those more technically-minded than myself to have a look.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Well it shows html programing but they show as if it's some kind of secret poker game with a meaning not sure will look into it..

originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: IAMTAT

Well it shows html programing but they show as if it's some kind of secret poker game with a meaning not sure will look into it..

I think the specific poker example was pulled from Wikipedia as an illustration of the bracket meaning/usage in Logic P.

a reply to: IAMTAT

My Bad to mention the poker game I mixed contents anyway I know a little about programming maybe I see something maybe I don't ?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

You can't make this Leftist hypocrisy up.
Nosir...ya can't make it up.

You can't whip and beat them if they aren't healthy.....