-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Does this apply to any of the people with whom we are familiar?

Uhhhh..... yup!

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
I love the timing of this Q-hating thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

In the midst of an undeniable MOAB and associated BOOMs

Aww bless, can’t you post in that thread you coward?

When all else fails, resort to name calling and bullying.

No need to respond. He'll go crawl back into his hole.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

I know what I am watching for out of Israel.

All the main players needed are active in the immediate area and the impetus to start the conflict is even there.

We're just waiting for the brushfires to kick up now.

nvm

originally posted by: Cygnis
a reply to: LanceCorvette

As Skeptek point out above, Macron.

Both Merkel and Macron visited Trump this week, at the White House to talk about staying in the Iran Nuke deal.

It's interesting how Netanyahu withheld his presentation until after macron and Merkel left the USA.

originally posted by: Skyfloating

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: dashen
Q says the CIA WAS in control in North Korea. When they left, Kim Jong became the person we see today. Could the same be said of IRAN?

Any country in which the people are oppressed, is largely owned by the Cabal. The Cabal has lost total ownership of SA and NK. Iran next.

It would be great if that happens without a war. The Nobel Peace Prize can have three or four recipients share it.

a reply to: carewemust

This IS being played out... Traps left and right... The world the evil has made is now working against them. Too me this has been known about and news delayed. That way everyone involved is already exposed by their actions. BOOM ... Not leaviing any plausible deniability.

Imo

a reply to: Cygnis

Right and Macron clearly shows it and starts to act if he's partying with the king of rock and Merkel always showing to the public in a position how big her kittycat is. There's a set agenda and it doesn't go as planned by those who want the NWO to succeed so what better if Trump failed and Iran would shoot at Israel than he has to deploy US forces to the region? It will again be another mess only bigger than the previous ones.

They both are sent by the same faction!

FOX News:

BIBI LOWERS BOOM

BIBI, Bolton, Rudy, Mueller. Its like having a flashback or something.

All this major world news going on, and what's the big story from the MSM today?

Stormy is suing POTUS over a tweet.
Stormy Daniels sues Trump

This only adds credence to the theory that she's a deep state asset being used as a distraction.

The Clowns have the best drugs

a reply to: xuenchen

what? what does that even mean...

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

Would those eyes lie to you?

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

What's next big bird going to sue trump because he never watched sesame street when he was little? how many skelletons do they have?

Iran becoming a THUDocracy (!)

😎☝️

+++++
++++
+++
--
-
[X]
Marks the Spot.
[V]

a reply to: LurkNoMore

yeah he's pretty much full of Sorro's

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: xuenchen

what? what does that even mean...

.


.


|[. . . _ _ _ . . .]|

🎁🔑☝️

a reply to: xuenchen

It's so obvious that those singled out countries are played like a fiddle by the

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical


Does this apply to any of the people with whom we are familiar?

This is what leaps out at me, there at the end.

Criminal prosecution of the SA was declined

Criminal prosecution of the SA was declined.

So whomever it was, the DOJ declined to prosecute.

a reply to: burntheships

I think it interesting considering all the things this SA is said to have done in the summary:

The OIG found that the SA contacted individuals who he either knew were, or had reasonable belief would be witnesses in the criminal investigation and that the SA’s contacts with several individuals appeared to be designed to improperly influence their prospective testimony. Accordingly, the OIG concluded that the SA’s contacts with the witnesses were improper and constituted misconduct.

During the investigation, the OIG also found that the SA divulged law enforcement sensitive information to unauthorized individuals; misused his government issued electronic devices; provided misleading testimony during a related civil deposition; mishandled classified information; misused his position during contacts with local law enforcement officers; and provided false information to the OIG. Criminal prosecution of the SA was declined.

That's a whole slew of potential charges; influencing witness testimony, improperly disclosing classified information, providing false information to the OIG, and more.

And they still declined to prosecute?