-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

a reply to: daskakik



holy crapiolli, youre almost getting it.
i wish you wouldve bothered to dredge throught the OP

a reply to: Elementalist

FYI - BBC has been saying today that Elon Musk is spouting about creating a "cyborg dragon"!!!

a reply to: Elementalist

I too have had a kundalini experience but with no opening of the third eye. After multiple spontanious arching of my back from sacral to lumbar. Then one morning it went from sacral to the neck with an arching of my spine while feeling a charge of electric energy. I was in the in between state of sleep and awake and simultaneously went into a dream state where I saw my body raised above a bed with a blond women standing over me. When I went down I went down in the dream like state with the woman touching my shoulder and saying I was okay.

i decided I wasn't ready for the full awakening at that time...or maybe it was my age.

Yours seems more like an awakening while mine was just an experience.

dbl again

a reply to: dashen

That actually just makes it more difficult for me to believe. Now I have two possible chain yankers. Infinity trolls doing it for the lulz and the gov doing it as an intelligence program because, two sides of the same coin doesn't stop with D/R.

Oh well, guess I'm done here.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: dashen

Oh well, guess I'm done here.

pinky swear?

Q the DRAGON?

a reply to: dashen

Yes, both pinkies, one for each post.

a reply to: daskakik

i fixed it. just one will do

a reply to: daskakik

Everyone in the choreography was in on it and it was obvious so the people were split into two groups, those that suspended disbelief and enjoyed watching and those who said that is fake an stopped watching after noticing.

I think we have three groups Re: Qanon. Non-believers, sceptics/fence-sitters, true-believers.

Is there something that you are seeing that keeps you here?

A non-bleliever, like you posed in your Choreography example, just quits watching.

I'm guessing that you see some validity in the going's on here, be it the reseach, the points of view, the mystery...whatever it is, it all orbits around Qanon.

I only say this because you haven't stopped watching, and you shouldn't, not because I want to project my own categorization upon you.

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: e9c4ae 826600
>>826502
You are safe.
THEY are terrified.
Sleep well, Patriot.
You elected us to keep you safe.
We will not fail.
/GA/ will change.
Notification will be made.
Where we go one, we go all.
Q

For the true believer, this might create a false sense of secutiy, but personally I only have faith in God. Everything else one puts faith in in this world is a false idol. If you put your faith in false idols they eventually fall off their pedisal and crush you.

I don't see the above post as a bad thing since it is meant to convey that the leadership under the current POTUS has put the elect, not the elected, first.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

I think at this point the hold up is procedural.

They have to decide what can or cannot be introduced into evidence due to attorney-client privilege.

How will prosecutors handle privileged documents from Michael Cohen raids?

Also, the government must have a plan for how it will find and remove any documents covered by attorney-client privilege before it seeks a warrant. A judge, special master or “privilege team,” often comprised of assistant U.S. attorneys, staff and FBI analysts, can remove the documents in question.

Members of the “privilege team,” which is also referred to as the “dirty team,” operate separately from the investigation team, often referred to as “the clean team,” that is assigned to the attorney search, says Ken White, a former federal prosecutor who now does white-collar criminal defense work at Brown White & Osborn in Los Angeles and blogs at Popehat.

and...

“If a judge decides that [the clean team] reviewed attorney-client information, a case can be dismissed. You want to wall off the people who are going to evaluate the evidence and prosecute the case from the people who are going to initially review documents,” says White, who wrote a blog post and a New York Times opinion about the search of Cohen’s office.

There's an interesting caveat in the last paragraph if you hang in there.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: pavil

I have to say, no matter what side a person might be on, that the lack of charges to date brought against Cohen is very disturbing. Lots of approvals were needed for that raid, and since it breached or appeared to breach attorney-client privilege of the POTUS's own attorney, then probable cause must have been extremely high, and therefore an arrest imminent, but, no arrest at least not yet.

If there's nothing there to rise to the level of a serious felony charge, then whoever ordered or signed off on or executed that raid should be in a heap of trouble.

Was it done in part to somehow compromise the President? Isn't that a crime?

Well Ankh, consider this. What if....

Rosenstein approved Mueller's referral to Geoffrey Berman, (U.S. attorney for New York's southern district ) with full knowledge that damning evidence against the deep state was planted in Cohen's offices. Plenty of FBI eyes get to view the evidence that's now admissable in court. They used the Stormy Daniels story as a cover for the media to gnaw on. And boom, a clever smoke and mirrors act that deals another critical strike to the swamp rats!

Mueller is in on it, and my guess is Berman was as well.

a reply to: CoramDeo

Sorry dashen, last post just because CoramDeo replied to me and I think it would be rude not to reply.

What had me here was the idea that it was just chan trolls yanking people's chain (I still think it is) and thinking I could point out where they might slip up but I see that there is a deeper faith involved, from the followers, and I just don't think I can even put a dent in that, so why try.

a reply to: daskakik

for people who have just wandered in just now, and haven't completely bought in yet?

Just curious if anyone else here attended a Trump campaign event. I went to an early one, like May.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

And then Rudy Guiliani magically reappears and heads to D.C, straight from Manhattan. He knows ALL. Maybe even brainstormed the Cohen angle.

a reply to: daskakik

well, i dont want you to go.
i want you to participate in a positive way

a reply to: CoramDeo

I'm with Dershowitz on this, particularly if there's no MAJOR felony on the part of Cohen and very high probable cause for a particular crime, in the sense that it's impossible to "wall it off" really since everything is acquired in the raid itself, then depending on who's in charge within a government hierarchy, some sort of attempt is then made to wall off the people handling the documents to separate one document from another, who then hand off the evidence of the alleged crime to other investigators. Unless it was handled by two completely different authorities in two separate hierarchies or chains of command, then because all the evidence was in their hands at one point, it's tainted.

Unless the crime was very very serious with probable cause extremely high, but if they just grabbed everything in the hope of finding something, then everything from the raid is already tainted because it violates the Constitution.

Further, note how the leaks about it went from one thing to another, from a Stormy Daniels payout, to some Ukranian webcast talk that Trump did, to God only knows what.

It looks like it was a fishing expedition, and the telltale sign is the delay in an indictment/arrest.

Trump being told he's not a target, is a promise that's as thin as the air because just one document, and a subject can become a target.

If they can't describe a specific crime for which they had probable cause going in, to go through everything to find something, anything, sets a terrible precident for lawyer-client priviledge, and the blowback for it ought to rest with Mueller, Rosenstein and whoever is in charge of the New York District FBI field office, and by extension with the DOJ who are the "boss" of the FBI.

It's totally wreckless and every day that goes by that Cohen isn't arrested for a serious crime creates a legal/constitutional dilemma.

In other words, on who's authority is all the evidence sifted and who is making the distinction? Dershowitz states that if they had it all to begin with then it's all tainted.

I think the idea was to pit Cohen against Manafort to make either one turn on the other, or lead them to believe that they did so, then getting one or the other to turn on POTUS.

I'm beginning to conclude that Sessions really does need to be replaced, and maybe Wray as well.

They're not the bulldogs needed at this moment in history.

I percieve that this, and the upcoming IG Report both have major blowback implications for Mueller and RR, but if Sessions can't bring the hammer down for some reason, then his recusal from the Russia investigation will be as Trump paints it outwardly - a foolish mistake. If OTOH, Sessions does bring the hammer down, then it will turn out in hindsight that it was an absolutely brilliant move.

What disturbs me greatly (Trump word) however, is how close Sessions and RR appear to be, RR who also signed off on the illegal FISA warrant to tap the Trump campaign in the first place, who helped get Comey fired, who appointed Mueller, who investigated among other things obstruction for firing Comey, and who also signed off on the Cohen raid at Mueller's suggestion.

Conclusion: If 2018 is not absolutely glorious in terms of the rise of true Justice for all - then i will be off the Q-train.

Google and Youtube make #fakenews CNN the top results for the Trump speech. POS. If that doesn't tell you something, nothing will.

a reply to: TheGOAT

What precisely do you mean? Can you elaborate a little further? Thanks.