-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -sIx-

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Quick thought:
Q keeps mentioning "WH"...everyone assumes it means White House.

Do you even Q?

Cross against WH visitor log 11/22-1/18/17.

HUSSEIN "STATE SECRETS" WH NAT SEC ARTICLES 1-9 - BURIED?

We knew certain areas of the WH were bugged.

Would you believe they called the WH for comment prior to publishing?

"Expand your thinking."
-Q

originally posted by: IAMTAT
"Expand your thinking."
-Q

That is not the same as "letting your imagination run wild"

Jeesh!
Is ATS using a rack of Commodore 64's as their servers?
It's so slow & glitchy today.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Skyfloating

Too bad they don't include dates with those factoids then people could see that many of those actions started before Trump even threw his hat into the political ring and way before Q started this LARP.

There have been links here in this thread to articles explaining exactly that which you are saying.
Except for the larp thing.

a reply to: butcherguy

Then how can Qanon take credit, as that tweet seems to imply, for things that took place before Qanon?

Not sure if this bit has been posted yet . I just found it in a comment on YT ...if true then it causes me to take a deep breath and relax a bit .

MORE - Follow the link to The Conservative Treehouse. "As a person familiar with such specific investigative measures shared: “They are sat down, told to not do anything, say anything or discuss anything UNTIL they get an attorney. At which time, the attorney is handed a letter from the investigating unit. That letter says in essence, this is how screwed you are. If you want to be less screwed you will sign this letter of cooperation and assist us. When we don’t need you, you sit there. When we do we will call you and you will provide what we need. Any deviation from this agreement lands you in jail for the full term.” ♦COOPERATING GROUP – FBI Agent Peter Strzok, FBI/DOJ lawyer Lisa Page, DOJ Attorney Bruce Ohr, DOJ-NSD Deputy Asst. Attorney General George Toscas; FBI Chief Legal Counsel James Baker and Asst. FBI Director in charge of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap, are all still employed within the system. Strzok, Page, Ohr, and Baker have been removed from responsibilities, but there are still there. Bill Priestap is still in responsibility and still there. ♦NOT COOPERATING GROUP – FBI Communications Director Mike Kortan (quit), DOJ-NSD Deputy Asst. Attorney General David Laufman (quit), AG Loretta Lynch AAG Sally Yates, DOJ-NSD Asst Attorney General Mary McCord (quit), FBI Director James Comey (fired), Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe (fired), FBI Director Chief-of-staff James Rybicki (quit).

theconservativetreehouse.com...

originally posted by: WhatTheory
Jeesh!
Is ATS using a rack of Commodore 64's as their servers?
It's so slow & glitchy today.

I only notice problems on this thread.

Fishy.

a reply to: SKEPTEK

Nothing fishy, these threads are full of memes

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: butcherguy

Then how can Qanon take credit, as that tweet seems to imply, for things that took place before Qanon?

Did qanon post what you are referring to?

a reply to: butcherguy

No, but it was giving qanon credit and skyfloating posted it without any disclaimer.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: butcherguy

No, but it was giving qanon credit and skyfloating posted it without any disclaimer.

So any anonymous poster makes a claim and it is proof that q is wrong.
If I post a meme that says that daskakik claims that q is not a larper, does that mean that you believe that q is not a larper?

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: butcherguy

No, but it was giving qanon credit and skyfloating posted it without any disclaimer.

So any anonymous poster makes a claim and it is proof that q is wrong.
If I post a meme that says that daskakik claims that q is not a larper, does that mean that you believe that q is not a larper?

2hy a need for a disclaimer...
The fact that it is an anonymous post is self evident.

originally posted by: butcherguy
So any anonymous poster makes a claim and it is proof that q is wrong.
If I post a meme that says that daskakik claims that q is not a larper, does that mean that you believe that q is not a larper?

It would mean that you are trying to convince people on the board that I believe q is not a larper. That would be incorrect and anyone pointing that out would be right.

So, what is the problem with me pointing out the incorrect info in that tweet?

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: SKEPTEK

Nothing fishy, these threads are full of memes

Um no.

Not a single meme on this page and it still loads like poo.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: butcherguy
So any anonymous poster makes a claim and it is proof that q is wrong.
If I post a meme that says that daskakik claims that q is not a larper, does that mean that you believe that q is not a larper?

It would mean that you are trying to convince people on the board that I believe q is not a larper. That would be incorrect and anyone pointing that out would be right.

So, what is the problem with me pointing out the incorrect info in that tweet?

The problem is with your original post...

Then how can Qanon take credit, as that tweet seems to imply, for things that took place before Qanon? 

You blame qanon for taking credit when that was not the case.
Do you see what I was calling attention to in your post when I replied to it?

a reply to: the2ofusr1

We knew that there were "cooperating witnesses" at the FBI, but didn't know how the process worked to compel them to cooperate. Thanks for sharing that. CTH is a very "connected" publication.

It's the weekend... Step back, take a break for a brief moment and enjoy what has/is happening! Don't feed the TROLLS.

a reply to: butcherguy

That is a bit nit picky but you are correct.

What I actually meant is how do people expect skeptics to believe if they post inaccurate info so, if qanon was actually trying to take credit or not was beside the point.

a reply to: butcherguy

By disclaimer I meant something like "I haven't checked the accuracy of these claims".

It was just put out there like it was proof of something.