Anti Trump Judge on Cohen case officiated Soros wedding, was Clinton AG pick

originally posted by: CB328
There's nothing wrong with this whatsoever. A judge was considered by a former President for a nomination, what the hell is surprising about that? That should tell you that she's qualified.

Because we know that the Clintons have engaged in quid-pro-quo dealings before.
So it begs the question...

Wood is currently[when?] married to Wall Street financier and former Harvard Law School classmate Frank E. Richardson III, whom she wed in 1999.[18][19] She had earlier been named as the "other woman" in a divorce battle in 1995 between Richardson and his socialite wife Nancy.[3]

Wikipedia

Mr. Richardson's knowledge and experience in investments and financial matters and his experience with growth companies are valuable assets to the Board and to the Company. Committees: . Audit . Nominating and Corporate Governance Frank E. Richardson has served as Chairman of F. E. Richardson & Co., Inc. of New York City, a firm specializing in acquisitions of and investments in growth companies, since June 1995. From 1986 to June 1995, Mr. Richardson served as President of Wesray Capital Corporation, a firm which also specialized in acquisitions of and investments in growth companies. From 1997 to June 2006, he served as Chairman of Enterprise News Media, Inc., which owned newspapers in Brockton, Quincy, Plymouth and several other towns in Massachusetts. Mr. Richardson serves as an Emeritus Trustee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, a Director of the American Friends of the National Gallery, London, England, and a Director of the New York Genome Center. Mr. Richardson has served on the boards of many public companies, including Alex Brown, Wilson Sporting Goods, Avis (Europe) and others.

Source: Sonic Corp. on 12/08/2016

Equilar

Interesting:

In recent years, Wood has presided over a number of major cases. In 2010, she presided over the case of 10 Russian spies who had been captured in an FBI counterintelligence investigation. The most famous was a glamorous redhead named Anna Chapman. At one point during the trial, Wood asked Chapman if she knew she was breaking the law. "Yes, I did, your honor," Chapman replied. She told the court, "I used a laptop in furtherance of the conspiracy." They all pleaded guilty, were sentenced by Wood to time served, and were promptly returned to Russia in exchange for a number of accused U.S. and allied spies being held in that country. Among them was Sergei Skripal, a Russian double agent who was poisoned in the U.K. last month.

Who is Kimba Wood, the judge presiding over the Michael Cohen case? - CBS News

Oh, this is fun:

Don’t you just love couples in which one spouse is a judge, with all the power and prestige of judicial office, and the other spouse is rolling in dough? Off the top of our head, we can name a number of federal judges who have married well — or at least wealthy. (Like Judge Kimba Wood, above right, with her well-heeled hubby, Frank Richardson.)

...

Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Supreme Court): Her husband, Martin Ginsburg, is a top tax lawyer and former partner at Fried Frank (where he’s now of counsel). The assets of the Ginsburgs subject to the financial disclosure rules — which, it should be noted, don’t include all of their assets — could be worth as much as $28 million.

A Solution to the Federal Judicial Pay Crisis: Marry Into Money - Above The Law

One more tiny bit of interest some will pick up on:

New York, NY (May 16, 2016) – Joint research by the New York Genome Center (NYGC) and 23andMe Inc. is helping scientists identify “multitasking” genes that influence a wide variety of human traits and conditions, providing a potential new tool for understanding how diseases interrelate.

New York Genome Center/23andMe Collaboration Validates the Use of Genome-Wide Association Studies to Find Unexpected Connections between Diseases

a reply to: seeker1963

Or the judge available that day.

originally posted by: CB328
There's nothing wrong with this whatsoever. A judge was considered by a former President for a nomination, what the hell is surprising about that? That should tell you that she's qualified.

It was a "cash only" nanny !!

AG fail

😊

a reply to: xuenchen

It was a "cash only" nanny !!

False. Payroll taxes were paid. There was nothing illegal done.

The case was different from the Baird one in that Wood had not broken immigration law and had paid Social Security taxes for the person.

source

a reply to: xuenchen

This is a real stretch isn't it? Oh never mind. Look who I'm asking. 🍭

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

All just standard coincidences !!

👉🤦‍♀️👈

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

This is a real stretch isn't it? Oh never mind. Look who I'm asking.

coincidences staking up high than syrian chemical factory rubble

russians

🎁

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rickymouse

She should disqualify herself because of her history, there is no way in hell she can remain impartia

Because she was a bunny trainee for 5 days in the 1960s while going to college?
Because she was nominated for and not appointed as AG?

Or is it because she's been on the federal bench for 30 years? How about some dirt about all the biased decisions she's made while doing her job? You know...an actual real reason.

Ever watch Judge Judy?

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: seeker1963

I’ve never felt the need to research it thoughly, but I suspect if I look it up soros is just your average person who is a big fan of unions or something..


The stuff y’all cook up about people would just be horrible if it wasn’t taken to a level it’s hilarious..

All the left wing conspiracies are just plain ole profit..

Buisnessman profits off harmful buisness.. buisnessman pays off politicians to ignore harmful buisness..

1+1=2

Conservatives conspiracies are just nutballz..


A plan to take all the guns!! Ain’t no money in that.. it would cost billions ATLEAST.

Scam climate change!! Spending billions of dollars to pay off countless scientists for a carbon tax we never passed?!?!

What?!!!


They have to use nonsensical open ended terms like “for control” or “to push their satanic agenda”..

It’s ridiculous..

I've never looking into the topic, but I am going to continue on about how wrong you are about this.
(translated version)