Russia all set for war

B1 Bombers involved. I'm not hearing anything about Russia shooting back.

If Russia were shooting back I doubt we'd hear anything about it.

a reply to: CharlesT

Who's this "We" that you speak of???

One Russian ICBM and accompanying warheads would blanket the UK with nuclear fire and fallout.

And our island is pretty much the pinnacle of a first strike target given its naval bases/detection facilities and infostructure.

At least some people in the USA have a hope in hell of surviving any initial exchange, not so for tiny little Britain who realistically should never have entered into the atomic race just down to geography alone.

End of the day let the Syrians work out their own problems, nothing to do with us period really, nor should their affairs be any of our concern.

Doint worry Will.
Remember Trump is Putins puppet.
He does whatever Putin tells him to do.

You remember the Russian collusion? Yep You were right. Everything is going to be just fine

originally posted by: Willtell
Russian envoy to Lebanon: Any U.S. missiles fired at Syria will be shot down

www.voltairenet.org...
www.reuters.com... SKBN1HI0PU

Alexander Zasypkine is the Russian ambassador to Beirut and Russia’s regional head in the Middle East. In the night of 10 April 2018, he was interviewed by the Hezbollah’s TV station, Al-Manar and made a bold declaration: every Western missile fired against Syria will be destroyed as will the base from which they are launched.
Zasypkine made this declaration to the Al-Manar following the announcement made by the White House, Downing Street and the Elysee that an attack on Syria was on the table. His intention was to make crystal clear Russia’s position.
Westerners do not accept that they have failed in Syria and are seeking out any pretext to disintegrate – smash into smithereens - the Republic of Syria.
Although Westerners will be seeking to retain control of the region with the use of force, the Kremlin is ready for war on a far grander scale. Doesn’t sound good.

Trump doesn’t realize the reality of diplomatic language—he’s an ignoramus.

The US defense head, James Mattis is aware of the Russians massive military potential, and the fact that normal diplomats don’t indulge in stupid stuff on Twitter like the fool Trump.

Likely Russia, behind the scenes in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS told the US IF YOU STRIKE WE WILL STRIKE BACK THIS TIME.


That’s why Mattis is cautious

Mattis warns Trump about Syria risks

www.cnn.com...

Washington (CNN)Top military officials, including Defense Secretary James Mattis, warned President Donald Trump during an afternoon meeting Thursday that he risks escalating US involvement in Syria if he goes forward with the type of aggressive bombing campaign he has pressed for over the past week, according to US and western officials briefed on the conversation.
Trump has pushed military leaders to develop plans for a sustained assault on Syrian regime targets in response to last weekend's chemical attack, the officials said. But Mattis and other members of the President's national security team cautioned Trump during the meeting that such a strategy could pull the US into direct conflict with Russia and Iran.
The resistance has upset Trump, who wanted to take quick action and feels like the options being presented to him don't go far enough, according to the officials.

Nevertheless, there is a view among Trump's national security team that the President's tweets earlier this week -- including one threatening US missiles "will be coming, nice and new and 'smart' " -- forced their hand and made some type of strikes inevitable. But there is an effort to calibrate the response, even as Trump is pressing his team to act.

Just happened

US launches strikes on Syria

Trump says he has ordered strikes on the Syrian regime in response for a chemical weapon attack last weekend

The savages of the west have struck

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump announced on Friday he ordered strikes on the Syrian regime in response to a chemical weapons attack last weekend. "I ordered the United States armed forces to launch precision strikes on targets associated with the chemical weapon capabilities of Syrian dictator of Bashar al-Assad," Trump said from the White House Diplomatic Room. Trump said the strikes were in coordination with France and the United Kingdom, adding that the purpose of the campaign is to "establish a strong deterrent against the production, spread and use of chemical weapons."

www.cnn.com...

originally posted by: Myrtales Instinct
B1 Bombers involved. I'm not hearing anything about Russia shooting back.

British Tornados in the air too !!

😶

a reply to: Willtell

I'm not saying this, because I'm on Russias side ... but Russia SHOULD go to war. Nothing Putin or any Russian will do, will alter the situation. The US, with Britain is set on killing russians, period. US Generals have come forth stating this as a fact.

Russia, sitting in a bunker ... is cowardice. That's playing "Saddam Hussein" or "Ghaddaffi", and all they will accomplish is being murdered, and their entire families assasinated as in the case of Iraq, and Lybia. Russia, will end up becoming another Iraq ...

If I were a russian, I'd START the war ... now, and not wait until tomorrow to have it knock on my door. It's a simple "war" effort thing, you don't play by your enemies rules ... if war is inevitable, which it is ... you strart it, preemptively.

The following is my "estimate" of things ... The US blamed bin Ladin for 9/11, not because he did it ... but because they wanted to use his soldiers, to wage war in the middle east. He didn't agree, but after his death ... his soldiers "pop" up in the middle east, as Al Nushra ... it's not coincidence, that Al Qaida becomes US ally, it was by design.

The US/UK coalition, murdered hundreds of Russian service men in Syria, by design. Russia, being the pussy it is ... didn't get it, and ended up with it's men dead. Russia, being the pussy it is ... didn't respons immediately, but decided to take "Ghouda", which most likely had US/UK base of operations, being close to Damascus. Russia, needing evidence ... propably used GAS to kill the US/UK agents, that were in underground bunkers ... this, is THE ONLY propability, where Russia would find "chemical weapons" useful. The UK claim, is bogus ... because it's not useful the way they say it is ... and UK/US lying all the time. I mean, you DO UNDERSTAND THEY ARE LYING, right. Makes the US/UK the most likely culprit.

I know first hand ... that "here" where I live, they hire murderers and liars in the intelligence services. And that isn't meant as a joke ... I know FIRST HAND, that NOTHING they say ... is worth the paper it is written on. NOTHING.

I know this first hand ... but I also know, that there is "some" truth to what they say ... but that the official version, is nothing short of a lie. So take the scenario, shuffle it around ... and find a way where the pieces make sens.

And the only way, the pieces make any sense at all ... is what I describe above. The UK is claiming "gas" attacks on UK, because it's own service men were killed in Syria. But it won't tell you why, because they are performing a crime in Syria. So they "fake" a chemical attack on the Skripals, which of course would have been 100% lethal if the Russians did it, but they survived ... because ... killing them, wasn't the objective.

Russians, don't make statements on TV ... they get revenge. This we all know ... so, Ghouda being "revenge" on UK/US for the murder of their service men ... is highly likely.

Your government, and mine ... are hiring criminals in their intelligence services. This is a FACT.

a reply to: Willtell

guess the russians missed . multiple sites hit

a reply to: Willtell


If they target one Russian asset we will be in a World War now!

Just thought it would be good to throw this in here:



I have my thoughts on why Trump would launch this attack, but that discussion belongs to another part of the forum.

Also, I read from a reliable source on Twitter that Russian jets took off from their base in Latakia. If this is true, we're in deep trouble.

a reply to: xuenchen

Wonder how many homeless people, doctors, nurses, firefighters and Police could be accommodated and employed for what the cost of this operation and accompanying smart bombs/missiles will amount to?

You really think so?
Maybe


I mean Russia never fought in Vietnam.

But I say this the Chinese WILL FIGHT the US. So when they go to Korea, watch out.

a reply to: dianajune

Are you serious?

a reply to: bjarneorn


Russia will most likely wait until the missiles stop, after all they now have a lot less missiles, all aimed at dud targets. So how much of the taxpayers money has been wasted this time.? I think we will see a ship or two sunk at some stage.

I posted this elsewhere

I guess Putin backed down. I imagine it’s the right thing to do since the west is just too powerful for him.


But they can bomb a little Arab country like they’ve done before and will do again.

We'll have to wait for God to deal with the demonic force that is the west, the US, UK, and France.

Putin obviously won't risk fighting for little Syria, that’s understandable BUT…


The west are bullies and won’t attack Russia directly for if they do they will destroy themselves and the world.

How close they come tonight shows their utter recklessness and disregard for human life and their hypocrisy

Mattis just said it's a one-time strike for now.

The thing is IF Russia attacks it won’t necessarily be a start of a nuclear war.

It can just be a tactical jousting over Syria, though that can lead to something worse.


Remember the Chinese fought and stopped the US in Korea in the 50’s and we didn’t go nuclear.



Putin might male a statement yet. But I doubt it.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: CharlesT

Who's this "We" that you speak of???

Don't think I even mentioned "WE" anywhere in my comment. If nukes fly "WE" are all toast.

a reply to: Willtell

Chances are it won't go nuclear over Syria, at least not a full-blown nuclear exchange.

Russia don't relish the prospect of glowing in the dark for the next 10,000 years any more than the rest of the world.

They might go after an aircraft carrier or two all the same, and that won't bode well, if it does happen.

They're not going to start a nuclear war over Syria.


This will make things ten times worse. The west has again ruined the peace of the world based on their ugly plot to destroy and or control the ME.

I hope GUT is right and it's just a token attack.

a reply to: CharlesT

Just being facetious really.

But if nukes fly buddy then we really are our own worst enemy.