It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Has anyone had a look at the other thread about this, the one by antediluvian? I can't make myself go over ther yet- I'm afraid that reading the excuses and deflections will get me too angry. Has anyone checked that thread?
Why are you scared of different opinions? Do we need a special section for Trump/right-wing only members?
Just go read it and find out. Knowing for yourself what others are saying will help you a lot. It is why I often read the right-wing circle jerk threads. Got to know what the spin of the day is and those are the best place to find it.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Has anyone had a look at the other thread about this, the one by antediluvian? I can't make myself go over ther yet- I'm afraid that reading the excuses and deflections will get me too angry. Has anyone checked that thread?
Why are you scared of different opinions? Do we need a special section for Trump/right-wing only members?
Just go read it and find out. Knowing for yourself what others are saying will help you a lot. It is why I often read the right-wing circle jerk threads. Got to know what the spin of the day is and those are the best place to find it.
I'm not afraid of differing opinions. What I don't like is seeing the Us vs. Them battles that tend to happen when certain members post at each other.
Many times it devolves into "But Trump!" or "But Hillary" and people end up defending the PERSON, not the principal.
The way we go at it these days is just that; defending or attacking the candidate/person/party instead of defending or attacking the principals we want them to stand for.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
Yes, whataboutism. So what? When can we expect the big reveal about that 2 page document that's going to blow the FISA case wide open?
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Has anyone had a look at the other thread about this, the one by antediluvian? I can't make myself go over ther yet- I'm afraid that reading the excuses and deflections will get me too angry. Has anyone checked that thread?
Why are you scared of different opinions? Do we need a special section for Trump/right-wing only members?
Just go read it and find out. Knowing for yourself what others are saying will help you a lot. It is why I often read the right-wing circle jerk threads. Got to know what the spin of the day is and those are the best place to find it.
I'm not afraid of differing opinions. What I don't like is seeing the Us vs. Them battles that tend to happen when certain members post at each other.
Many times it devolves into "But Trump!" or "But Hillary" and people end up defending the PERSON, not the principal.
The way we go at it these days is just that; defending or attacking the candidate/person/party instead of defending or attacking the principals we want them to stand for.
The spin is that the OIG hid all the examples of McCabe breaking the law from the report and the DOJ is going to do another investigation to uncover criminal acts never mind the fact that the OIG can investigate and refer charges to the DOJ if they find any illegal conduct.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: The GUT
These people are SICK! Rosenstein MUST follow Comey and McCabe OUT THE DOOR!
originally posted by: RadioRobert
a reply to: Pyle
Yes. Exactly. Perjury and false statements are criminal offenses. Not the job of the OIG to prosecute crimes. So hardly surprising that the OIG report lacks that language and is focused on failures in the department to adhere to policy.
What do you think Huber has been doing in connection with Horowitz since at least November?
originally posted by: Pyle
So why would the OIG hide criminal activity from their report? They have the power to refer charges and report criminal activity.
...
The spin is that the OIG hid all the examples of McCabe breaking the law from the report and the DOJ is going to do another investigation to uncover criminal acts never mind the fact that the OIG can investigate and refer charges to the DOJ if they find any illegal conduct.
The Justice Department inspector general referred its finding that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe repeatedly misled investigators who were examining a media disclosure to the top federal prosecutor in D.C. to determine whether McCabe should be charged with a crime, according to people familiar with the matter.
The referral to the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office occurred some time ago, after the inspector general concluded McCabe had lied to investigators or his own boss, then-FBI Director James B. Comey, on four occasions, three of them under oath.