Supposedly UFO Activity Increases Before Major Wars.

originally posted by: Willtell
The aliens want to snatch the WMD’s out of the sky in the event the of a nuclear war. That’s why their hanging around

I've seen that mentioned frequently over the years. Instead of merely observing a species wiping itself out of existence, some visitors could be here to prevent our self-annihilation. That would be disclosure on steroids wouldn't it!

They were called foo-fighters in WW2 times by the pilots who flew and saw the aerial phenomenons.

If they were good, they would have terminated all globalists by now.

Maybe their quantum computers have stated that this is the 'big war' and they are here, positioned in orbit to gain new recruits.

As they have not intervened, what if all people who die soon, have their spirits collected by these aliens (scifi technology) and get inserted into new host bodies (grays). The black eyes are like black sinful spirits in a meat-suit.

Christians naturally get removed (Rapture) before everything goes nuclear.

Time to pick a new boss to trust; Jesus or aliens, who both need more recruits from this Boot Camp Prison Planet.

originally posted by: Blackhawk0044
They were called foo-fighters in WW2 times by the pilots who flew and saw the aerial phenomenons.

I'm surprised the military didn't think that these "foo-fighters" were superior secret weapons owned by the adversary/enemy.

In vietnam they hired people to communicate with aliens who land to communicate. I watched an interview with the guy. He said he became friends with one in particular.

a reply to: carewemust

Well 'they' are patrolling our planet. Os tinkal nu sense. So increase UFO could be bad sign. I guess they tracking radioactivity on the planet . When the big boss fight starts however I don't think they do anything anymore to prevent stupid humanity to blow it self up / or decimate itself. However extinction level events are still prevented.



However I think the Assad+Trump+Putin show is just ... a 'show'. At higher level there is not really a confrontation but the false flag chemical attack is a good reason to

1 Bring diplomacy back in the mix.
2 Surround IS with massive amount of troops.
3 Keep the boogeyman/coldwar theme go on for the public (good reason for weapon industry to produce more 'guns')

I think that life-forms which are advanced enough to travel between the stars, probably see a lot of wiped-out worlds, but not that many in real-time..as it's happening

... I more or less believe in galactic nanny's. Also this argument is used to explain why we don't see ET. For me it's makes more sense that old civi's help the younger more immature.

UFO's expose above behaviour. Think about it if a civi is that advanced , could it create a 'forcefield' surrounding our planet. Maybe even a tiny dysonsphere. The universe might be very different from what scientists see.

Our planet a big zoo (rethorical) ? Hell yeah , look at your neighbours

a reply to: carewemust

It has been said in many forums and publications that UFO activity increases, before a big war.

If what has been said is true,

then its obvious


Before war and sending in troops, recon is done to to plan and strategize the assault.

If there is no big increase in UFO activity...perhaps a MAJOR War is NOT going to occur over Syria at this time. What do you believers in advanced non-human life forms, think of this theory?

I think UFO activity has nothing to do with the likelihood of war occurring or being prevented.

Like I said it may indicate reconnaissance missions being run prior to war if there is an increase.


I think you are humanizing Extra terrestrials with the fascination of destruction and killing, however, who knows.


Its all just speculation and assumptions

a reply to: carewemust

Pracrically everyone on the planet now carry a phone that records video and takes picrures. Yet we haven't seen a massive increase in sightings. Should have been a huge difference between say now on the 60s. As the number of cameras available went into 100s of millions. So why didn't we see this increase you speak of?

a reply to: InhaleExhale

I think your on to something military aircraft fly more frequently before conflicts. Sightings increase meaning many of those sightings are miss identified aircraft.

a reply to: carewemust

they definitely did at first. both sides thought this until it was investigated and proven not to be the case.

Vallee in one of his books mentions that during fuedal Japan, there would omens or strange signs in the skies before there clans would clash.

Then there the Fatima event which occurred after WW1, and long before WW2. Ufos being sighted during during live combat, and artillery shells not going off stories read on Ats near the end of WW2 is an oddity.

Then there was huge surge of sightings, again according to Vallee, after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. And that hour long ufo battle over Germany a century or two before the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, during medical fuedal Europe.

Where thee logic that they are going to invade...when they already check mated.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Blackhawk0044
They were called foo-fighters in WW2 times by the pilots who flew and saw the aerial phenomenons.

I'm surprised the military didn't think that these "foo-fighters" were superior secret weapons owned by the adversary/enemy.

That was the case by both sides. Both thought it was a weapon by the other side at first.

Just saw Toroks post!!

a reply to: dragonridr

We do though. There is a significant increase. The problem is that mid 00's, people shifted into wanting mobile phone cameras instead of camcorders. Camcorders effectively lost their track, and thus the majority of people switched over or preferred a camera that didn't zoom very much. So we do have many many more footages than we did many years ago, but we all moved over to a "zoom-less" technology, making any videos from the mid 00's to be practically, visually, poop.

Remember when we used to get vids of zoomed in images cos the person had actually zoomed in on them, a famous one of "looking through a UFO windshield" I think came out of the camcorder era, 2003 or such. Jump 5 years ahead and you've lost all that in favor of "white or orange dot in black background" videos as created by mobile phone cameras. Basically the camcorder era came and went all too quickly and what effectively replaced that is just rubbish for capturing UFO footage. And no-one in their right mind counts the "single orange pixel on a black background with no reference points" style videos as anything of any value, so it can seem like we don't have "much" in recent years. We do. It was just all caught on crappy mobile phone cameras.

But if you factor in night vision, which has become more consumer over the years (though not like camcorders or smart-phones) then yeah, we blitz earlier decades with the amount of footage in recent times. But you walk around nowadays in a major city and you see hundreds of people playing with their phones. Back around the millenium it was like that with camcorders - actually half decent technology for capturing UFO footage - nowadays you look around and be lucky to spot one or two people using camcorders.

I don't see all that big an increase in UFO sightings -- at least those worth anything. We get a lot more lights in the sky, but for years now there has been a dearth in sightings and encounters that have any "meat" to them.

Besides, that's one of those things you can only claim after the war (or whatever has happened). Nobody bothers to remember the comets or UFOs that show up when nothing is happening.

I think this is one time where the data analyzed by Vallee may be accurate, but the reasons behind the data are still obscure.

Hmm. Well, I've had about 6 since 2005 (and none before that, 25-ish years of life). And I know others have had many of their own sightings/experiences in the last decade. So a youtube playlist is no representation of if this phenomena is "slowing down" or anything.

And I know me nor them really cared about capturing them on video, let alone necessarily given the chance or equipment to consider doing it at the time. Actual people are still having the sightings and experiences, even if they're less glamorous than they used to be.

There's also the issue that people who grab their phones and can't not check for notifications or whatever it is everyone seems to do every 5 minutes, and whatnot - are generally more pepped up people nowadays. UFOs show themselves to chilled out dudes and dudettes, not snapchatters. Someone who sees a true-FO is more likely to sit back and ponder it, than grab their social media and share it. That's another level, of manufactured human behavior, and it's not on this level.

But who knows maybe the phenomena evolves, as someone else said, the extravagance is lower now perhaps because we can capture things in HD if we want or something like that. They've moved back into the shadows, so to speak, harder to find now. It's a bit like the 50's-00 were a big PROD, hey we're here, look at us. Now the work is more on us to seek them out...

There are a lot more pilot reports nowadays than there used to be, it's no longer a secretive aspect of aviation. Documents have been released in their thousands over the last decade. Major ministries/governments across the world have said "we're open to it" in the last decade whereas before it was mostly secrecy. Progressively, there have been leaps and bounds in all directions except footage. Maybe we needed that? "They" probably know better than we do

Here in the UK we haven't had a UFO-flap since 2009. And it takes a flap to get the masses capturing things really, cos between now and then, most people are busy in their own little worlds, lol (me included). A UFO flap interupts peoples daily schedules. Without that, the onus is on you and me to tear ourselves away from ATS, youtube and facebook and make the effort to find them for ourselves. And right now it's cloudy at night (and has been for a week) I'm comfy, warm and have a nice coffee, so no thank you aliens lol.

All that said, I do agree with OP. It is a prime time to keep a look out. I was tempted to visit somewhere the other night on news of the US/Russia tension for the reason of UFO spotting, because the time does seem ripe for it, with historical elements fortifying the notion. But it's cloudy, and I don't UFO spot on the basis of things near the ground, I "study" high altitude so generally won't bother if it's not starry out. I also had a day of co-incidences, which I rarely encounter nowadays, and always consider that as an indicator of a good time to see UFOs lol (unfounded, just some personal belief). But yes, now is a good time for it if history has taught us anything about UFOs, and beyond that, but based only on personal belief, this year (summer season) might be better than previous for UFO sightings (and footage) all round.

There will be no nuclear war, ET will not allow it.

They are too encased on our planet (yes, it’s those darn underwater bases again) to allow us to harm it and ruin their whole exploration process.

If they are more active perhaps that is because they are on alerts status to decommission our nukes (yes, you’ve got to keep moving to keep watch on those darn submarines).

Any launches will be thwarted, and then the governments responsible will have to come up with an excuse for why. But Putin already knows this and has an excuse in place, and most likely Trumps group knows the pre-planned excuse too.

It has been said in many forums and publications that UFO activity increases, before a big war.

Can you cite your sources for this?

From what I can gather there were UFO flaps, like in 1947 and 1952, that weren't particularly related to a war in the USA? Are there specific frequent reports of UFOs in 1939 over Europe or 1941 over the USA Pacific Coast? Did we see an increase in reports over Afghanistan before Sept. 11th 2001? Or over Ukraine when the Russians invaded in Crimea in 2014?

This post seems to be based on a vague impression from 'forums and publications'. But the major problem with it is that there is no evidence that this is even true.

originally posted by: mirageman
From what I can gather there were UFO flaps, like in 1947 and 1952, that weren't particularly related to a war in the USA? Are there specific frequent reports of UFOs in 1939 over Europe or 1941 over the USA Pacific Coast? Did we see an increase in reports over Afghanistan before Sept. 11th 2001? Or over Ukraine when the Russians invaded in Crimea in 2014?

When has there not been a war brewing on the horizon, if not actually taking place?

a reply to: mirageman

I'd say what's considered documented is worded a bit different, it's "heightened activity during and around times of "worldwide tension", if there really is such a thing. Lots of UFO documentaries about the testing of nukes and heightened UFO activity for example, and many of those cases were during times of "heightened tension". So yeah, it's not really "when there's a war". It's when there's nuclear tension. It could be for any number of reasons, whether its preparation of nuclear weapons, testing of them, usage of them, whilst there's plenty of stipulation, I don't think there's any definitively known "action" that we humans take that sort of calls the aliens out of their holes lol.

But there's plenty (documentaries, cases etc) to say it's something to do with our harnessing of the atom (and things like it) at certain times. OP's title with "Nuclear Tension" instead of wars would be more accurate to what they were probably trying to convey (if they're learned in the field). Cos you're right there's no real tenable links to actual wars that breakout, beyond perhaps foo-fighters. UFOs don't intercept conventional battlegrounds lol, but seem to be interested in nuclear ones.

All that said, there's no real indication that it feeds off "breaking news" either. So just because we're being told there's tension, I guess there actually has to be real, meaningful, tense actions being undertaken for things to actually happen. I mean, let's say the news makes everyone fearful of nuclear wars on April 1st. That's when we FEEL the tension. And one month later on May 1st country X conducts a nuclear test. That's when the tension actively occurs (as such). Any UFO activity in my mind is likely to happen around the second event, not the first. My point being is that we can possibly skew the correlation between tension and UFO activity assuming things are happening just cos the news is telling us it is at the time that it does. But when you look into the time of actual "tension building" events themselves, there does seem to be corresponding UFO activity, in some cases at least.

And I agree. There is at least a marginal chance aliens would not allow a nuclear holocaust, for whatever reason. But if retired top ranking US military officials are to be believed (and I'd say most of them at least are), it's possible.

I ran the Out of the Blue documentary the other night. UFO documentaries, visually, are all the #ing same. But if you let that run and allow some other related videos to play, more like a podcast whilst you're doing your work, a lot of these cases are mentioned. It's a good way to easily ingest a lot of UFO lore at once. Can't remember the name of the one specifically about UFOs and nukes that followed Out of the Blue but they almost all at some point mention the time "UFOs lazered third stage of a ballistic nuke" and the "UFOs lazered and shutdown nuke bomb facilities". And how incidents very similar in nature happened both in the US and Russia during the cold war.