Is Nasim a real person or an AI propaganda bot

Well we already know that they have programs out there to manipulate videos, even live feeds. They can mimic your voice, face and movements.

I wouldn't be surprised if that's what's going on here.

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: Mandroid7

Ask the families of the dead and injured if she's a cyborg...

Everyone pack your bags, od's taking us on a guilt trip.

That's the best you got?

Let's stick with the facts shall we.

1.the smith mundt act was passed legalizing propaganda
2.tech already makes fake videos off other peoples faces, hopefully you've seen it here.
3.there is a massive gun control push
4.AI makes videos just like this, with run on robotic monotone audio
5.her videos sound just like it( my opinon)
6. guilt-trippers usually are manipulating others, or protecting their beliefs(my opinion)

With the above activites going on is it out of line to think googtube is above doing this?

Does the grey area have room for discusdion on a conspiracy website, or do we need to stick to msm narratives?

a reply to: Chickensalad

Exactly chickensalad.


Especially suspicious, is that google is heading up this AI crap.

Will AI be the first thing they do that's not evil?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Okay first of all the thing I've been bringing up since the beginning: the accent. Nothing like any sort of Arabic accent I've ever encountered. The closest I ever heard is Dutch.

To me, it sounds like a bad attempt at a French accent. The greater Detroit area has a large ME population. I am quite familiar with Arabic accents, and that isn't even in the right ballpark.

originally posted by: Outlier13
a reply to: Mandroid7

She was a real person. Nothing in any of the videos even remotely resembles AI generated visual or audio. She just wasn't an expert at video editing or audio editing or perhaps she was just an eccentric person who liked making weird shlt.

Creating threads like this gives a bad name to legitimate conspiracies. I'm not saying you don't have a right to question things. I'm just saying you should perform more due diligence before you make outlandish claims that can easily be disproven.

Your allowed to have an opinion. Thanks for yours.

Start that video at 32 seconds and listen to the audio.
It all has the echo-y, run on monotone voice like AI trying to talk.

Watch some other AI talking videos, they are exactly the same.

It is a legit grey area conspiracy imo.

It was placed in the grey area for a reason, I didn't make the youtube, but she has some interesting observations.

Her videos are so mesmerizing yet creepy at the same time.

Thanks for joining in this weirdo thread.

Everyone's opinion is welcomed here.

I apologize if I didn't get back to everyone quickly, I've been jumping around lately.

Please don't take offense to this angle, it's purely just weird grey area theory, and we should be open to just about anything with the way we are being manipulated these days.

a reply to: Mandroid7

Surely to God no one was offended by this thread, OP!

'Nasim' is very 'Max Headroom' even if she is 100% real.

a reply to: TrueBrit

Interesting, I will do some research on that tech.
Always good to hear what you have to say TrueBrit, thanks for dropping by, I know this is a little out there.

originally posted by: hombero
a reply to: Mandroid7

Why would "they" use an allegedly fake looking AI construction for this purpose when "they" have allegedly been able to use dozens "crisis actors" in the past who are much more believable? Why wouldn't "they" just hire one of them to make more authentic videos before their alleged false flag?

Crisis actors are expensive, and the 9 mill obama stole from tax payers and bounced back to all these shareblue type scams is running out?

The better question is this.... Google has been caught manipulating the narrative, tracking everyone, spying on everyone, etc, etc...

Would it be wise to assume they would use AI for good now?

Is Google an actual company?

If they are, why aren't they being punished for their behavior?

a reply to: WakkaFlaka

Haha, I know, right?

I got the heebee jeebies and the jeepers creepers when I watched it.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

It sure is

I've watched a lot of those AI videos, AI learning to speak, AI music, etc, and it looks very similar and robotic...

It may be a bad translator robot dubbed over her audio, but her movement are unnatural too.

Idk, food for thought ayway

I think she may be a computer overlay based upon a real person. I've never seen a nobody like this with so many internet pics and I'm guessing most were CGI.

This thread brought a lot of info forward I was unaware of, like the Obama CGI rendition. I didn't know that had been done. Back in the 2016 campaign after the 9/11 memorial/fiasco I watched a lot of Hillary vids and noticed many I thought were totally CGI because she has a very noticeable neck wrinkle that goes around about 1/2- 3/4 way down her neck. I thought it was someone wearing a mask at first b/c some times she didn't have the wrinkle, then other times she did and many times she wore turtle necks or high neck sweaters/shirts that covered this very noticeable mark.

The thing is I looked at a lot of politicians and many of them had the neck wrinkle as well as some actors, and most were 50+, so maybe it was age. I started looking at people in real life and never noticed one and pics of people not famous on the net, I rarely saw that kind of wrinkle. It's hard to describe but it looks like a crease where a "mask" could end and the real skin starts. I just figured I'd get a bunch of BS responses on here and told I was nuts so I never said anything, but that was some time ago when I didn't really post.

originally posted by: Mandroid7

originally posted by: odzeandennz
a reply to: Mandroid7

Ask the families of the dead and injured if she's a cyborg...

Everyone pack your bags, od's taking us on a guilt trip.

That's the best you got?

Let's stick with the facts shall we.

1.the smith mundt act was passed legalizing propaganda
2.tech already makes fake videos off other peoples faces, hopefully you've seen it here.
3.there is a massive gun control push
4.AI makes videos just like this, with run on robotic monotone audio
5.her videos sound just like it( my opinon)
6. guilt-trippers usually are manipulating others, or protecting their beliefs(my opinion)

With the above activites going on is it out of line to think googtube is above doing this?

Does the grey area have room for discusdion on a conspiracy website, or do we need to stick to msm narratives?

No, for real, ask the relatives if she is an AI.
It's not a guilt trip. It's pointing out the craziness of this.

have to agree that it looks very robotic

If true, then why hasn't anything come of it? there has been more outcry from school shooting than this one.

Doubt this is anything other than a deranged woman who needed mental help.

There not talking about it because it's a transsexual and that fits in with there agenda. They are not even trying to take down the content on youtube, that's proof.

originally posted by: hombero
a reply to: Mandroid7

Why would "they" use an allegedly fake looking AI construction for this purpose when "they" have allegedly been able to use dozens "crisis actors" in the past who are much more believable? Why wouldn't "they" just hire one of them to make more authentic videos before their alleged false flag?

Practice.

originally posted by: circuitsports
There not talking about it because it's a transsexual and that fits in with there agenda. They are not even trying to take down the content on youtube, that's proof.

Wait...people are claiming its a tranny? Doubt it. She is not trans. I would believe AI over Trans except there are pictures of this person outside of youtube videos.

I honestly think this is one of the many things that is actually real and as they say it is.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

obama