-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: EnzoD

If he has them then why announce it and then never do so?
Why even announce it, why not just release?
What does BS smell like?

Here's another "drop":

Q pointed out obvious yesterday that the Syria Chem Attack was totally suspect.
If Q gets it, and is part of Trump, why doesnt Trump get that?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I'll believe it when I see it too.

But there are plenty of good reasons why one would announce they had something like this but not immediately release it - Q only posted about this photo 2 days ago.

I think we'll know by the end of this month whether Q is legit or not, he's made too many direct references to major events going down in April that if nothing happens his credibility will take a huge hit (IMO anyway). As ever with these things, time will prove them right or wrong.

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: tiredoflooking

For the sake of transparency. This is most likely a fake. Infinity discussed it briefly and it's apparently not a recent pic. Sorry.

i respect the heck out of this post. thank you.

I always tell the truth.

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The "Chem attack" is an obvious red flag here. It seems that Q is blaming the deep state.. but now we have Trump warning Russia and Iran over it. If Q is right, then Trump is going along with the deep states foreign policy. I don't think POTUS has control over it. Frustrating and annoying for sure.

Of course it is. Trump announced to pull out of Syria and this happens. Also Pelosi recently visited Israel.


Edit: Pelosi leads delegation to Israel, Jordan

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) will lead a delegation of Democrats to the Middle East beginning Saturday with stops in Israel and Jordan.

Ten House Democrats will accompany Pelosi on the trip, which will focus on "global and regional security and cooperation issues," according to her office.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
I always tell the truth.

same

thought y'all might find this of interest...

Lynn de Rothschild Recap.

I think they told her to quit Twitter because she was not smart enough to mask the agenda.

Like that time she silently unfollowed Russel Simmons after his resignation for rape.



Like those times she gushed over mass murderer Paul Kagame.







Like those times she foamed with hatred of the U.S. President





Like the times she supported Pedophile-Enabler Pope Francis:





Like the times she supported the fake opposition John McCain



Like the time she tried to distance herself from Skippy after PG became known:

For a second there I thought Epstein's Island burst into flames.
This is my favorite secret War so far.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You know he didnt give time for release.

Disinfo is part of his game.

Maybe the photos do exsist. The other side knows.

Maybe they were just trying to scare the other side into reacting.

Like putting out fake news stories for dummies to spread

As someone on the Chans said normies will not care about Barrack with a gun.

Hopefully it's something better.

I dunno pics of the screens in dungeon was pretty big.

Just have to be really careful not to spread any disinfo right now.

Hoping for something big.

If we don't get it? Ya I and many will be upset!

Patience I hope will pay off in the end.

If it doesn't? I will be let down because mostly I want these people to pay regarding kids.

If it all crumbles then we all know we need to accomplish this ourselves, united together it can be done.

What I learned by slogging through the posts from yesterday is enlightening.

1. If you are on a conspiracy site, the original conspiracy site, you are an idiot for talking about/exploring a conspiracy to remove the controlling entities of earth.

2. You are wasting your time being a part of this, but those who’s life’s purpose is to debunk are spending their time well!

3. Unity is better served if it is divided up into parts.

4. Those who demand proof move the goal posts, often. They also fail to define the logic system the are using for some reason: Inductive, Deductive, Modal, Legal and so on. This makes them seem superior when in reality the look silly.

5. My favorite posts are the one's that say, "if, then how come..." as if placment of the two in the premise assurures that the two are connected. Too funny, demanding the use of horrifyingly poor logic as a way to define suprior logical thinking.

6.Folks will learn at some point, but the “gotcha” moment for both sides will not happen from without, but only from within. That fact is a naysayers wet dream btw.

For those who find this all silly, please turn to lurk mode, but stay in the hunt. If this is pointless it has far more staying power then the CIA’s pokeman project and is way more fun. Remember, Q and those in the trenches, cannot be debunked if it is true, if "it is happening" .

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The "Chem attack" is an obvious red flag here. It seems that Q is blaming the deep state.. but now we have Trump warning Russia and Iran over it. If Q is right, then Trump is going along with the deep states foreign policy. I don't think POTUS has control over it. Frustrating and annoying for sure.

Yes, THIS is what we should be looking into folks. Not the BS story of Epsteins island on fire.

Obvious false flag in Syria. Q's latest post confirms it, but anyone who's awake can clearly see it too. We have to dig on this one. When I get home from work tonight, best believe I'll be going down this rabbit hole.

They'll be releasing tons of gruesome pics today. Let's dig into those. Dig into the white helmets. Dig into the "Syrian-American Organizations" that were so quick to comment on the news yesterday.

Get your shovels and dig! The deep state is pulling out desperate moves. Make noise!



Eta: sorry the 2nd meme has terrible resolution.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: MostlyReading

Okay so whats a reasonable timeline to hold him to it? At what point do we call BS that it was a bogus prediction? How many days / months / years do we wait for that gospel?

You've already made up your mind that it's BS.
Be honest.

I keep begging the entire scene to make me a believer, telling it all the ways to do it, and none of it happens just the same old same old that goes on in here (ignore/deflect/deride anyone that rocks the boat / doubts / etc).

Then I get the impression we're only supposed to think about what Q tells us to. And make my kind f little stink about such a sheepish notion. And not one person stood up to correct the thought experiment.

Then we've got examples like this gas attack thing Q says what he had better say but today Trump is doing the exact opposite of that assertion.

Like I've said before, I'd prefer Q wasnt "part of Trump" or whatever, that Q didnt say things like "you voted for us to ______", that Q wasnt so apt to step on his own d!ck, and have the balls to challenge Trump when Trump is wrong.

I can easily see this thing go down as a sort of timely political "Y2K" thing, where after all the fervor and obsession etc that so many put into it, it this potential honeypot when it implodes and embarrasses so many then the opposition uses it as a 'oh is this like Y2K' every time a new counter movement thingie starts catching steam.

Is the kind of stuff why from the very beginning since I finally started noticing this stuff I immediately started warning of the dangers of putting blind faith loyalty and fervor into such a thing (supposedly attached to politicians no less).

And now that I've been looking more and more at it, begging the people all into it to make it make sense, while it itself increasing bears the hallmarks of LARP BS / subversive disinfo campaign / Perception Management operation / etc.

But maybe, just maybe, I keep insisting int eh ways I have been somebody around here thats followed this stuff from the beginning will actually go and do those OP's I keep saying would clear up so much of this doubt. This doubt that isnt even really mine per se, its just all over the surface of this scene. And I keep explaining how to fix it, but nobody can be bothered to despite being so all into it, spending so much time on it anyways, enough that they'll shut out people that they would probably otherwise mostly agree on stuff with and appreciate except that person dared rock the boat on this little game.

I honestly keep telling myself I'm done looking at it, but its an interesting social experiment indeed, this big petri dish "Q" has cooked up, like so many other modern trends in social / political communications and the effects it has on people. SO I probably should sit back and just observe, but I'm gonzo bebe, while the rest of the forum is more boring lately with so many people now spending most of their ATS time in here and so many stories that would be OP's in ATS getting dropped and left in here where nobody herein is willing to take hardly any of it and run OP's off them.

As with any big thing that demands attention, careful what you wish for. Because now you've got mine.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Lynn de Rothschild Recap.

I think they told her to quit Twitter because she was not smart enough to mask the agenda.

Like that time she silently unfollowed Russel Simmons after his resignation for rape.

Like those times she gushed over mass murderer Paul Kagame.

Like those times she foamed with hatred of the U.S. President

Like the times she supported Pedophile-Enabler Pope Francis:

Like the times she supported the fake opposition John McCain

Like the time she tried to distance herself from Skippy after PG became known:

Twitter is a strange beast. In reality no good can ever come of it, these just wreak of "keep your mouth shut you idiot" and yet she went on. Now, the twit is being used against them as a main tool to connect. Quite the spin.

a reply to: crankyoldman

You really are wonderful you know

a reply to: dashen

Why would that be a good thing, even if it wasn't fake? So much evidence destroyed by fire. And then what? Just leave it and pretend it was an earthquake, let the evidence decay even more? What's that supposed to accomplish? It definitely wouldn't stop trafficking; no island is needed to traffick people, it's not logistically sound.

If Trump had the leverage to blow it up, then why not send troops to scope it out instead? It would be a huge propaganda victory. Or is this about preventing their satanic rituals that give them power or something?

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

You know he didnt give time for release.

Disinfo is part of his game.

Q disinfo'ing his own followers?

You really shouldnt say that.

And if he did then that's a preemptive damage control for being a farce that posts farcical BS.

I MEAN just imagine if any other 'news source' (as for all intensive purposes thats about all Q is) openly said "we engage in disinfo of our own readers" the outrage that would pour out in this site. They dont even say that, but we 'all' know it around here and outrage about it anyways. But then, according to you, Q says it, and its to be treated as a stroke of brilliance?

Maybe I'm misinterpreting whatever Q meant by "disinfo", by the way you're explaining it?

a reply to: Skyfloating

Oh my goodness! She really is dumb

Got a good laugh! Ty.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I've said it before, but I think your type of healthy skepticism is exactly what is needed here. It encourages more research and reveals the hard questions. Please stick around! You're very valuable here and could add a lot more to the discussion.

Now maybe I've been a bit euphoric about that island so as most here are better fact checked obout this than I am I'll leave it as fake news.

But when searching on the topic of this island I stumbled on this old article that I never knew had occurred.

Stephen Hawking pictured on Jeffrey Epstein's 'Island of Sin'

Could his death be related to something that he wanted of his chest?

I really respect this man and I don't think he would have go there if he knew.

But as the article stated many researches were funded by Jefrey Epstein .

He said that the conference "wouldn't have happened if Epstein hadn't funded it" and that Epstein continues to fund research and science education.

He said: "He's supporting some of the work at my institute."

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The "Chem attack" is an obvious red flag here. It seems that Q is blaming the deep state.. but now we have Trump warning Russia and Iran over it. If Q is right, then Trump is going along with the deep states foreign policy. I don't think POTUS has control over it. Frustrating and annoying for sure.

Wook,

I'm lost on this sort of topic, but I see how it arrived. The President is the Commander In Chief, so he's the top general so to speak. Originally he was supposed to actually go and fight to defend the business interests that created the position. It stands to reason, that he parses every single word. It also stands to reason that they lie, either for good or evil: WMD, WMD.

The Q process has taught, if one followed for 6 months that DJT says X, but it may not mean X at all. If one followed Q to date, not yesterday or to debunk, one would see the NK rhetoric was not war with NK, but war with CIA. We who got it, turned NK into CIA directly, so when DJT said "NK" we knew what he meant - the CIA did too according to our insider.

All is not what it seems, press releases aimed at the world are not what they seem. Q view is different then sheep view and or SHEEP view and is not easily translated at this point. I truly fail to see where the idea that all things Q or related are "honest, direct, truthful" and are there to "predict" like a gypsy for people who like games and if not then it all falls apart. WMD, truthful?

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

Eta: sorry the 2nd meme has terrible resolution.

That SP is a good one. The second one is technically an Infographic.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Well... I surmise he means disinfo for the opposition.

Of course we do not know for sure.

As we are all listening we all must decode the disinfo. Us and them.

I also surmise that Q has several games running at once.

There is info put in the drops for every intelligence level. Something for everyone.

I think there is coding for those who enjoy decoding, spy games for those who like adventure, romance for those who who need it.

It's not a news broadcast.

Tell me what news broadcast actually gives us any truth? We might say it used to but has it ever, really?

I value your type of critical thinking, we need it here!

What do you think of the resurgence of the research forum here? Would you be into working on that?