-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I keep telling you we will do it depending on how things finish and they aren't there yet

So only after "its" is "finished" then a Q fanatic will go and make OP's for things like 'list of evidence Q is Trump insider', or 'list of Q predictions to date'?

Ignore all advice, constructive criticisms, sound credibility / 'movement' methodologies... in a domain where half the people are hostile to such...

Dont do yourselves any favors.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Q has said , repeatedly, that disinfo is necessary.

That's just my interpretation of it.

Sounds to me like a preemptive cover for when Q doesnt know what the hell he's talking about / gets stuff wrong / post jibberish as content filler / is actually a subversion agent / shall I go on....


I keep trying to not have contempt for this whole thing, as I respect many of the people all into it, but it just isnt made easy. Quite the opposite.

q1048



www.thestoryofq.com...

q1049



www.thestoryofq.com...

q1050



www.thestoryofq.com...

anyone know how if it all that photo of BHO can be verified?

originally posted by: WhatTheory
q1047

www.thestoryofq.com...

Well look at that the second Red White dropped just like i predicted it. Trump hinted at this when they turned the WH Blue.

Some reason the good old Georgia guidstones came to mind. So I looked em up as a refresher. They were updated with a date, in stone of 2014. Now looksy at the top stories of 2014. I won't give you my opinion why that date was put there.... But that was when a ton of hurt was put right in our face

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: introvert
There are have been numerous instances where Trump authenticated Q and Q drops, both via twitter and verbally. It's in the threads. Q is definitely with Trump. If it's a hoax it's on Trump himself for perpetrating it via Q.

I see people quick list off some examples here and there, buried in threads. And then I seen the one completely debunked.

But there's supposed to be all these others, and people sick of this thread being derailed with the question, then why the hell doesnt someone that knows all the examples go and post a nice OP that lists it all out.

#1: It would give this whole thing its due credibility.

#2: That would mean less people compelled to disbelieve and come ruffle peoples feathers in this thread.

#3: When people do come in ruffling feathers about that then link them the thread that proves it.

Instead, refusing to do so ensures everyone will continue to doubt it, be compelled to ruffle feathers, and then there will be four pages in a row like today any given day of the week derailing this thread.

And then when you tell people to read the thread if they want to know 'whatever', well when we know a sizable percentage of this thread is a jumbled mess of troll spit then who the hell has time to read 1000 pages riddled with such noise?

All of which I've been pretty much saying starting back like 600 pages ago and yet we still havent seen the thread(s)...

originally posted by: WhatTheory
q1044

www.thestoryofq.com...

That's disturbing. What do you make of it?

Regarding Obama, at this point nothing would surprise me about him. We've uncovered enough over the years to know he's a completely phony persona created by the Deep State. His early life is so murky, it spawned an extended debate (ironically, started by Hillary's supporters) about whether or not he was even born in the United States. He appears to have attended college as a foreign student, and his tuition was paid for by the Saudis, via the guy who founded the Black Panthers. His social security number was stolen from somebody in Connecticut. He was part of a clique of gay men at Rev. Wright's church in Chicago, with three other members of the group dying shortly before Obama ran for president. His wife appears to be a transvestite, sporting an adam's apple whenever she looks up, and conspicuous crotch bulges on multiple occasions. His daughters are strikingly similar in appearance to the Obamas' close friends Anita Blanchard & Martin Nesbit, to the point where it seems likely they're Shasha & Malia's real parents.

A picture of Obama in tribal dress would be about the least phony thing we've seen.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Definitely Andy,

Sometimes I get carried away by information from sources that can't be "proven". Otherwise, people would be in jail without a doubt. However, a lot of what we are dealing with here is like that.

Q has mentioned that there are people involved in media and other places that are tasked with giving information outside of the normal chin comms. I am convinced that the blinds are part of that. There is tons of information on trafficking and abuse that gets leaked through there which has been revealed to be true.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The mods wouldn't allow such thread to exist. Why do you think we got confined in here?

a reply to: coldlikecustard

Media Matters addresses it here:

BILL O’REILLY: Many Americans, including this one, believe Barack Obama’s emotional attachment to the Muslim world has hurt the USA. There is no question the Obama administration's greatest failure is allowing the Islamic terror group ISIS to run wild, murdering thousands of innocent people all over the world, including many Muslims. Mr. Obama has never, never acknowledged that mistake, nor does he define the ISIS threat accurately. That group is killing innocent people in order to impose a radical version of Islam on the world. The jihad is solely based on theology, perverted as it may be. President Obama, as we all know, will not even use the words Islamic terrorism. Again today when telling the nation that America will maintain eight-thousand troops in Afghanistan, the president did not accurately describe the situation there, putting forth that it was more about politics than Islamic terror.

And here's the Express Tribune:

A similar set of photos featuring President Obama in the same dress were shared by Malik in 2004 PHOTO: AP

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Anyone could go ahead and sum things up I suppose.

I am speaking for myself when I say that if I were to do a thread I would wait.

There is more than enough for a thread showing things Q has leaked that have proven to be true.

Personally I am along for the ride and I feel like I want to see the ending before I make a thread.

I have no interest in trying to prove validity to others at this point because if everything comes out in the open there will be no need.

If it all collapses or Q is atrempting to radicalize us then that will come out also.

I have no need to prove to others what has already transpired.

I am along for the ride for now.

Waiting to see where it all ends up.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The mods wouldn't allow such thread to exist. Why do you think we got confined in here?

Where have they said the only -whatever- about Q in this site can only be posted into this thread?

originally posted by: coldlikecustard
anyone know how if it all that photo of BHO can be verified?

I don't think the photo listed in the Q post matters much.
It's the pictures to come with obozo & gun that will matter.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

That's disturbing. What do you make of it?

I think it means that the MSM will try to censor the photos by attempting to remove them as soon as posted. I don't think it literally means that the net will shut down. But who really knows right?

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The mods wouldn't allow such thread to exist. Why do you think we got confined in here?

Here's what to do: Compile the whole thread (using Notepad++ I advise). Post the thread, but have all the code saved on file. If the mods delete it then paste all the code in here. Then put the link to the post in your sig.


a reply to: tiredoflooking

Okay well as a long as no one is willing to make the case with any of this stuff, part of the "ride" will involve all manners of doubters, critics, trolls and shills to derail this thread for pages on end on a daily basis.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The mods wouldn't allow such thread to exist. Why do you think we got confined in here?

Where have they said the only -whatever- about Q in this site can only be posted into this thread?

Take a look at the existing Q threads and what became of them. The majority on ATS is still not ready for this. The hostility towards us proves it.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

The mods wouldn't allow such thread to exist. Why do you think we got confined in here?

That seems odd. I wonder if they would allow a RATS thread. PG can be discussed there still. I don't see how Q couldn't be.

Maybe knowing such pictures were coming out would be the reason for a pre-emptive hit piece in a certain New York rag