-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

a reply to: daskakik

Agreed IF it comes back negative.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Mass-Jealousy breaking out everywhere this week !!
😯

a reply to: crankyoldman

Well that took a LOT longer than I expected... here is the greenanon post raised in my Boom post.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Trying to validate a rumor that Cohen was also Jeffery Epstein's lawyer at some point.
Does anyone have info on this?

I read many time his lawyer was Alan Dershowitz,
but never saw Cohen's name mentioned.

Yes, I was aware of Dershowitz, too.

Obamas uninvited to royal wedding.

www.cnn.com...

www.cnn.com/2018/04/10/europe/royal-wedding-guests-intl/index.html

a reply to: FlyingFox

Obama will be radioactive like hillary b4 november.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Agreed IF it comes back negative.

Well where is it?

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Fire in the Skies...

A runway is not exactly the skies, is it?

a reply to: eisegesis

That was sure weird ? We've seen that technology with robots , but how could they do this unless Barry was involved in making this video ? Is this more conditioning to not believe what tapes or videos may come to light ?

Presumeably in response to 4 Booms and probably scene-setting cabal defenses for the future, I bring you:

4 Plops from deep state
On BBC news, 4 news items oddly grouped together today

1) Bill Gates speaking at the Commonwealth leaders meeting today about the risk of losing the gains made in Malaria control. Without his foundation "could go back up to a million victims" (on your head be it Trump?) BBC article

2) Katie Ford (Ford Modelling) shown talking about how she saves Phillipino women from trafficking. No article link available on website!!!

3) A BBC interview with Kofi Annan in Geneva in which he spends the first 10 minutes odd slagging Trump off; saying leadership is not about ego.

4) Don't know how on earth this gets repeat airtime on BBC today!!!!
Tumbleweed< br />

Two points of note
a) This looks like a coordinated campaign,
b) There appears to be a deliberate tactic to make the important items unrecoverable on the BBC website - in effect censoring the source of the propaganda they feed us. The link for the Bill Gates item is text but not any of the 2 videos that have been shown most of the day (1 in BBC HQ and 1 at CHOGM - Commonwealth Heads Of Goverment Meeting).

originally posted by: MountainLaurel
a reply to: eisegesis

That was sure weird ? We've seen that technology with robots , but how could they do this unless Barry was involved in making this video ? Is this more conditioning to not believe what tapes or videos may come to light ?

No, that one is an obvious fake.
But that technology has been public knowledge for 2 years or so now. You just need a few short clips and you can make a video of anyone saying anything.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Fire in the Skies...

A runway is not exactly the skies, is it?

The fire in the engine started in the air. They had to do an emergency landing before it got worse.

a reply to: MountainLaurel

It won't matter if the video is RAW and thus couldn't be altered or manipulated.

a reply to: watchitburn

That's amazing, Is it possible for experts to tell the difference ? How where you able to tell, what made it obvious to you ? I watched it twice and it sure looked like his lips were saying every word ?

a reply to: Perfectenemy

OK, I took a quick peek and posted in a hurry before heading out.

a reply to: daskakik

After 8 hours searching for one post to make a point, I'm patient enough to let Future prove past on this one.

Not biting today but ask me again in a few months, meanwhile "Ciao4Now".

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Yeah, well those stories are pretty old.

I'm waiting as well. Kinda hoping that Trump doesn't get reelected because I don't want to wait that long although I will if I have to.

THIS is a nice development:

Scoop - Miami Herald Sues for Court Records Involving Jeffrey Epstein’s Alleged Sex Trafficking Ring

twitter.com...

originally posted by: 0bserver1
As I mentioned before and I'm looking with other eyes to what I see.

Q is more about symbols that are in-your-face-obvious and hard-evidence rather than stuff that debunkers can easily debunk and mock and call Pareidolia. Such as that building being an obvious inverted cross...thats in-your-face, no guessing required.