-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

Lol someone caught pdesta at an airport and snapchatted him

Note the precise look on Podesta's face and note also the synchronistic aspect of the blurred man walking in the background between them and note his hat in particular, that's what I call a meaningful synchronicity.

originally posted by: TheGOAT

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

Lol someone caught pdesta at an airport and snapchatted him

Podesta has the face of some slimy, dirt ball, rat.

He looks like he wants to eat your liver with some fava beans.

a reply to: IAMTAT

It's engine casing does that, not superficial shroud which is for aerodynamics.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

So it's Scientology minus the closet homosexual male actors, plus branding.

Got it.

originally posted by: Phoenix
a reply to: IAMTAT

It's engine casing does that, not superficial shroud which is for aerodynamics.

So the explosion was of a type outside of normally expected parameters.

Frazzledrip Conclusion - Frazzled R.I.P. but still frazzled if you're HRC.

twitter.com...

Could have been a real embarrassment, but the people have all but worked it out now, and it's only raised awareness and anticipation for the thing itself if it exists and the MSM are too afraid to even touch it (the rumor and the hoax), just in case it does.. !

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Excellent unrolled Thread explaining Q drops today:

1) This is my #Qanon thread for April 17. Q posts can be found here: qanon.pub... qanon.pub...

My theme for this series: "We Are Being Set Up"

twitter.com...

The Booms become kinda interesting if staggered to indicate time? Now tightening up? Could they mean something else entirely when they line up? The whole is greater then the sum of the parts?

Clearly the boom matters to the overall narrative. If the boom was ever thought to trigger FBI etc., a different word would have been chosen, but boom it is, as boom it must be.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

It was controlled opposition to make people automatically believe there's no such thing.

😉

a reply to: crankyoldman


Flynn liked to "boom" for big news and big things particularly if they were to the chagrin of the MSM. This is in the same spirit as that. May the many booms continue to boom, one by one in steps and stages. He should step them UP next time..

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

May the booms be with us..

a reply to: FlyingFox

Not sure it'd have to be sophisticated at all. The intake is very strong as long as 360 degree integrity is maintained.

A light charge in right place during climb out or even mechanical scoring of nacelle structure with battery tool could cause a fail of nacelle.

One can fathom if engine sucks in nacelle pieces during takeoff or climb out that it might cause loss of aircraft and appear as an engine failure.

From photos I'm leaning very much towards an external cause of incident.

a reply to: xuenchen


Very likely but I don't think so, I think it was a psyop directed at Clinton and the MSM who would normally pounce all over this kind of thing to ridicule the Q people.

It, the rumor, and the film I think have scared some people, and at the end there seemed to me to be something that looks a lot like the video from Epstein island where I think they may have Hillary walking the halls, among other things.

There is probably a tarmac recording also.

Note how everyone's backed off Trump the last few days, as we look to NK and a new deal with Iran and Russia and China, Syria and even Israel.

They're still running with the continued bombing campaign that isn't happening, sanctions on Russia (that Trump may wish to make use of in his talks with Putin), but it's not going anywhere with Trump stepping in to say that Nikki Haley was moving too fast without 100% authorization by Trump, as he plies everyone with the tension of it all, to make a big deal.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

I took a quick goog around NXIVM Leader Keith Raniere and I see surprisingly little attention.

This story has: celebs, cute actresses, cheap skin branding, socialites, human trafficking, at least one pretty well known celebrity/royal pleading to save her child, and a self help guru!!!!!! Scandal of the decade? Why is this not all over the world?

When you put it like that, Cranky...damn. There's just no explanation for that that doesn't speak to the reality of a great and prevalent evil. That observation just hit me like a ton of bricks.

a reply to: IAMTAT

That's kinda my conclusion from available photos and basic A/C knowledge - yes.

When will we know if Pompeo (Kansas) has been approved for Secretary of State? If he's already been in talks with NK, then shouldn't they approve him right away for that task?

Maybe some people don't want Trump admin to make a denuke deal with NK?

My sentiment in response to James Woods' tweet in honor of Barbara Bush.

twitter.com...

You can't make this stuff up.

...... And the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting Goes To....

Staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post

"For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration. (The New York Times entry, submitted in this category, was moved into contention by the Board and then jointly awarded the Prize.)"

originally posted by: crankyoldman
You can't make this stuff up.

...... And the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting Goes To....

Staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post

"For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration. (The New York Times entry, submitted in this category, was moved into contention by the Board and then jointly awarded the Prize.)"

Mutual Admiration Society.

Maybe we should keep this in mind?

a reply to: crankyoldman