-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: MostlyReading
Blood thirsty and sociopathic people can be surprisingly dumb, since they simply can not understand the concept of empathy for innocent victims of war.

I agree with everything you wrote. The above part is especially well-communicated.

They cannot understand the concept of empathy for innocent victims of war...but they can use computer models to predict that empathy.

Hence....the 'Q' placebo.

Jerome Corsi tells the story:

CORSI: Yeah Tim, I’m a political scientist. I got my Ph.D. at Harvard in 1972, and I have always been fascinated with and studied political violence, political protests.

The very first things I wrote were even before I went to Harvard. I wrote some things on political – racial violence, on race riots. “Shootout in Cleveland” I was co-author of, and that ended up being one of the task-force reports to the Eisenhower Commission on the causes and prevention of violence. That was in 1969 it was published.

I always had an intuitive understanding of political protests and political violence. I got a top-secret clearance from the government in 1981 after I published a computer model that predicted the outcome of terrorist events. I published that in a journal at Yale in 1981, and then I started getting requests all over the world from intelligence agencies for that paper, and I got contacted by the Agency for International Development to help them on hostage survival when the Reagan administration just came in.

Link

Jerome Corsi is a very intelligent man and a master debater.....with a very questionable history. His roots suggest he was a progressive until he was suddenly...someone who is easy to revile, debunk, and discredit....the face of many worthy causes that failed thanks, in large part, to his efforts.

Corsi is a 'Q' follower (pied piper)...that's all I need to know.

(I recommend reading the above link and anything else you can find on young Jerome Corsi. He's a very serious player in the world of disinfo and he's a great metric for measuring how deep the doodoo is.)

***

Still love so many ATSers in this thread, btw. They are the cream of the crop, IMO.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

but they can use computer models to predict that empathy.

A computer model to predict empathy? If a computer model predicts empathy then it's aware of what's happening imo and therefore uses consciousness to actually feel?

I don't think that we can say this exists?
If algorithm recognition can be the same as connecting synapses in a neural brain then I should be a synthetic processor.

To my understanding there are no computers that have this quality so the outcome would be unreliable?

originally posted by: fiverx313

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Note it sounds like child porn.

Could be a troll move to get people busted.

there is no way in hell it's not a troll.

4chan is messing with y'all because they know you want to have it proved that bad.

how does this sound credible to any of you? :/

It sounds credible because I've talked with an FBI agent who has seen such films that were made in the days of the Franklin Scandal. Stuff that made grown men cry and vomit----and quit their jobs when nothing was done to those who committed the crimes but the people who reported the crimes were put on trial. Some of those people died after talking about what they had seen. "Accidents" and "robberies" and such happen to FBI and DEA agents all the time,eh?

Are you really so naive as to believe that these things don't happen? And that the perps aren't so conceited that they believe they are above the laws to which mere citizens are subject?

I sincerely hope that neither you nor your love ones ever encounter this particular type of evil.

a reply to: 0bserver1

More like a computer model that uses data to predict an outcome that includes a massive empathetic response.

I find the attack on Jerome Corsi with a little bit of contemptuous snark added for good measure to be very interesting in and of itself.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
I find the attack on Jerome Corsi with a little bit of contemptuous snark added for good measure to be very interesting in and of itself.

He personally screwed me over on my research on Obama's birth certificate. I don't trust him and with good reason.

If you disagree, that's ok. It's not your personal experience.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

That's the same as Facebook uses , likes for input? As of this board also uses?

a reply to: 0bserver1

I am sure there is a very broad spectrum of data and the more you have...the better your predictions.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

So we are the mainframe extentions

a reply to: diggindirt

i feel like this distinction keeps getting lost. yes i am aware things like this happen. i can think this sounds like a big pile of BS without thinking 'terrible things never happen'. you guys don't have an exclusive license on knowing there is evil in the world.

a reply to: 0bserver1

I googled it, but I'm still not sure I know what you mean. Can you expound?

a reply to: MotherMayEye

But Q posts are in some cases non existent and only days later verified to become existing, hows that?

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
I find the attack on Jerome Corsi with a little bit of contemptuous snark added for good measure to be very interesting in and of itself.

He personally screwed me over on my research on Obama's birth certificate. I don't trust him and with good reason.

If you disagree, that's ok. It's not your personal experience.

I don't follow this Jerome Corsi...but I'm familiar with so much of your great work on the Obama birth certificate from discussions in other threads.

I'm sorry we don't see eye to eye on the nature of Q...but I'm always grateful when we get to work together in a thread.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Well, if this computer model triggers the user to input by feeding us with awards given from another user it triggers us to find more accessible data to choose from for those operating the system?

Making us the extension of a computer network of gathering information

originally posted by: liveandlearn
Just came back to say this thread is degenerating. We need to get back to the original person or disband.

May not be saying this correctly but know some here understand.

Still trying to catch up and hoping that the troll feeding will cease and they'll go back to their political trolling. The Nattering Nabobs of Negativity are so boring and take up so much space....

I'm simply amazed by how many mind readers we have here---from reading Trump's mind and Assad's mind and Putin's mind, knowing EXACTLY what each one of those guys is thinking at any particular time. The burden of such knowledge must be truly overwhelming.

I don't claim to know what any of them are thinking or planning but I do know that any one of those guys is a lot smarter and knows a lot more than I do. If I believed everything I read on the internet, I'd be a raving idiot. I'm willing to sit back and see what happens since there's not a blessed thing I can do to change the immediate future.

I don't believe the chemical attack narrative this time any more than I believed it last time. I don't want to go to war with anybody. I, like Ron Paul, want to bring our troops home. I've been an anti-war protester for 50 years, not likely to change now. I'm not going to support Trump in a war but I will support his good moves, like getting legislation through congress that will actually make a difference in the lives of me and my community.

Now, not to be a 3N myself, I'll say Thanks again to those who participate in this great guessing game, presenting ideas to get us to think outside the box, to expand our thinking and to learn to accept that there is no ONE WAY to the truth we seek. Still trying to catch up ....and hoping for the best.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Hi IIB,

Re: your first paragraph about manufactured breakdown can I ask for a clarification so I understand better?

My croatian family has always said the governmental breakdown was due to Tito's death. It was Tito who expertly brought the arguing member nations together to form Yugoslavia in the second World War and it was he who managed the constant squabbles amongst them to keep the alliance together. Once he died it was inevitable that it broke apart.

Now consider that one of my cousins married the daughter of one of Tito's generals (and even used to holiday on Tito's private nudist island). She has never disagreed with this version.

Like I say, i'm just interested in the truth, especially when I'm educating my grandchildren on the croatian element of their heritage.

I just checked the youtube for the documentary that breaks it all down, but cant seem to find. And I just plugged the disk in that has it on it, but windoze doesnt want to let me access it right now. I gotta handle some business, but posting this so I can better remember.

He's got it well done though, state department video interviews and everything in there dude seriously went thru all the material out there to be able to make was my impression. None of the sectarianism was by chance, it wouldnt have happened like that without US/NATO meddling and setting the stage playing on old stuff. It was like the test run for the Arab Spring, and even our own society if you've noticed the term "balkanization" in reference to all the identity politics BS and how its fracturing society.

The stage first got set in motion during Reagan, and went bare knuckle during GHWB. That's where catch 22's were thrown at them, each step that would have prevented the groups breaking down the State Dept etc did EXACTLY the 'right' moves to make sure right on through for years until it finally went supernova. Then NATO etc still kept catch 22'ing whatever side was in question during each period sort of thing on thru to 2000.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
I'm always grateful when we get to work together in a thread.

Me, too, TAT!

'Q' or not...we have a lot of common ground!

#1147

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

Referencing the SC/LL Tarmac meeting.

Red.Sparrow.2018.1080p.KORSUB.HDRip.x264.AAC2.0-STUTTER#

A young Russian intelligence officer is assigned to seduce a first-tour CIA agent who handles the CIA's most sensitive penetration of Russian intelligence. The two young officers collide in a charged atmosphere of trade-craft| deception| and inevitably forbidden passion that threatens not just their lives but the lives of others as well.

originally posted by: ketsuko
#1147

qntmpkts.keybase.pub...

Referencing the SC/LL Tarmac meeting.

The Supreme Court is thankful.

😎

Bombshellz comink szoon.