-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: LurkNoMore

Aw schucks.

My avatar is the propaganda poster the "Observers" paste everywhere after they come back from the future and take over, in the final season of "Fringe". Great show. Great true dystopian season.

Loved that show. Never understood the drill bit thing though.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Trillium
LOL now read the part on the right

2 meanings

I did. Reaching to connect dots is all I saw.

#1. Authorize B1, etc
#2. Author Book 19 days from today (April 27th)
JFK files being released on April 26
Rochelle SPARROW is AUTHOR of BOOK on JFK
Prevent at all costs. = blackhat will try to prevent release at all costs

The post above yours says it was the Auth B-1, etc is talking about bombers.

Who knows what you mean by #2.The book was published 2005, and the JFK files can be redacted however "they" see fit. What came of the last batch?

read the new release date of the new 2800 page

April 26/2018
Should get your eye check

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: liveandlearn

No Q or any chatter on Infinity. Goddamn this fake BS has to stop.

Who says it can only come from Q? NYPD had been talking about this for over a year.

I've tried to find actual NYPD statements about a number of things the past 2 years, but have been unsuccessful thus far. Always some "source" saying that NYPD "has this proof", or " was so repulsed by this", etc..

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
He's 100% correct of course.

If ATS didn't just delete your historical comments you could find me losing my # here about the random appearance of ISIS the new Boogeyman. It was an instantaneous shift from Al-qeada to ISIS.

Thank God. ISIS is so much easier to spell.

I was tuned out of all this stuff around then, but a friend came over and had me put on videos those initial ISIS driveby shooting videos. Hardcore graphic stuff. That's a lot for me of all people to say it. I didnt have any reference for who they were even supposed to be. But the first thing I notice was the fancy state of the art looking gun and helmet cameras they were sporting to shoot the high quality high speed shootout chase videos. I mean could they just go on Amazon and order the stuff? It just screamed CIA to me. Then of course my reaction was "ISIS"?!? Mother of Horus Isis, but apparently its the MSM insist we utter the name of Horus's mother all day long (ISIL proved they hate that name by iconoclast destroying all the ancient world statues they could get a hold of [not unlike Antifa imagery]).

a reply to: Trillium

I did see that date. It isn't about that book it is about the new JFK Records. What does that have to do with the book? There isn't even a loose connection so what are you making such a ruckus about?

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Keep an open mind without a rush to judgement in the absence of all information, follow Q, and come up to speed ASAP. That's what I did.

After the tears and outrage, perhaps InfoWars should note that there were no casualties, that the missile strike was as measured as possible, that it was get in get out wham bam thank you ma'am, and not an attempt to depose or overthrow Assad, and that now it's on to NK and amending the Iran deal.
INFOWARS - follow Qanon, come up to speed, and let's get back on track and moving forward.
GodSPEED!

Yeah, Alex for all his alleged intelligence is way off track here. These strikes, like the ones last year, are political theatre.
Apparently a few weeks ago the Syrian army captured 11 Brits, some Americans, an Israeli and a Saudi in East Ghouta that were training the jihadis on how to use the brand new 100+ mortar shells loaded with VK gas that were found with them, delivered from Porton Downs in the U.K. (Where Skipral worked)

Marines were sent in to rescue them and remove the evidence (the mortar shells) but were wipe down out by the SAA.

The Syrians refused to release the operatives so MI6 carried out the Skipral false flag to pressure the Russians to force Assad to give up his captives. When that didn't work, even though the mortars with the gas had been captured the jihadis went ahead and faked a gas attack anyway.
Under pressure from the black hats in the deep state and the MSM, Trump decided to kill two birds with one stone... 'look strong' and demonstrate he is not a Russian puppet by ordering this strike and at the same time take out deep state operatives in Syria.

Meanwhile relatives of soldiers serving there are reporting the troop withdrawal from Syria is going ahead as planned, but quietly.
Who needs to read Clancy or Ludlum when the 'truth' is just as intriguing?

disqus.com... t-3855843637

Don't ASSUME.

I have to bring this up. Why did Fox news run a story about the end of the world on April 24th?

Although the article was written to embarrass or disprove it, it was brought up nevertheless. Why?

I haven't heard that much about it though I am familiar. Interestingly enough, if I'm not mistaken, that was the date given in the AM broadcast. "Trump, April 24th" over and over again. Now Fox mentions it. Suddenly gives credence. Keep one eye open.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

You are going to have to accept that you can't convert everyone to your "new found religion".

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
He's 100% correct of course.

If ATS didn't just delete your historical comments you could find me losing my # here about the random appearance of ISIS the new Boogeyman. It was an instantaneous shift from Al-qeada to ISIS.

Thank God. ISIS is so much easier to spell.

I was tuned out of all this stuff around then, but a friend came over and had me put on videos those initial ISIS driveby shooting videos. Hardcore graphic stuff. That's a lot for me of all people to say it. I didnt have any reference for who they were even supposed to be. But the first thing I notice was the fancy state of the art looking gun and helmet cameras they were sporting to shoot the high quality high speed shootout chase videos. I mean could they just go on Amazon and order the stuff? It just screamed CIA to me. Then of course my reaction was "ISIS"?!? Mother of Horus Isis, but apparently its the MSM insist we utter the name of Horus's mother all day long (ISIL proved they hate that name by iconoclast destroying all the ancient world statues they could get a hold of [not unlike Antifa imagery]).

Not to mention brand new Toyota trucks. Well financed. And the Egyptian theme wasn't lost on me either. You have to understand what is is First.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

I'm curious really.. I do not mean to imply you did or did not support O but did you feel like you were being played then?

a reply to: daskakik

What? We're just talking about world events and unfolding history, and possible background moves and counter moves.

Your cynical skepticsm bording on hatred and intollerance is ridiculous and absurd.

Maybe you have a blind spot and you're not as smart as you think you are.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

You do realize I've been following Q front the very beginning right?

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Then pay attention to the evolving context and narrative in light of new information and understanding.

Sometimes it's necessary to maintain an open mind before a rush to certain judgements and conclusions, so as to stay up to date and up to speed on what's really going on. Make sense?

Otherwise, we end up developing something called - contempt, prior to investigation, which is a path towards a state of eternal ignorance.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
I have to bring this up. Why did Fox news run a story about the end of the world on April 24th?

Although the article was written to embarrass or disprove it, it was brought up nevertheless. Why?

I haven't heard that much about it though I am familiar. Interestingly enough, if I'm not mistaken, that was the date given in the AM broadcast. "Trump, April 24th" over and over again. Now Fox mentions it. Suddenly gives credence. Keep one eye open.

"Trump April 26"
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

You keep telling people to read up and even after reading up, or having been following along the whole time, not everyone is going to agree with you.

The blind spot is called mistrust of anything that sounds iffy.

Might not be that smart but it is better than just hoping that people who have never cared about me all of a sudden start caring because of a political position.

Also ask yourself what difference does it make if people believe Q or not? In which direction do they want to guide popular opinion?

I just saw you guys go from frothing at the mouth about eliminating evil to cheering for military action.

Honestly I'm seeing a massive uptick in fear mongering articles, videos, you name it.

originally posted by: Pseudosyntax
Honestly I'm seeing a massive uptick in fear mongering articles, videos, you name it.

Pentagon announces 2,000% increase in Russia trolls since Friday

www.axios.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

No, I mean actual fear mongering. As in the worlds gonna end, # hits the fan, OMG Constitutional crisis, Impeach now, Abolish the 2nd, WW III, lost count after that.

What I'm saying is that bots are out period... Whether it be the political hound or the actual 'puterized variety.
It's really hard to find non biased sources anymore.