-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: smashdem

That wasn't my intention.

The aim was to give the reader the choice of what to read by providing some kind of classification that flagged to them whether it will be something they're comfortable to read.

I'm definitely not suggesting censoring - just labelling!

TRIGGER WARNINGS!

Gotta have those safe spaces.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I'll play

“It’s libel to say I use my newspapers to support other business interests. The fact is, I haven’t got any other business interests.” – Rupert Murdoch

www.counterpunch.org...

Sorry, Roops, old sport? What about your interests in Genie Oil and Gas, Inc., which consists of American Shale Oil Corporation and an 89% interest in Israel Energy Initiatives, Ltd. in Israel?

Don’t you want people to learn that you are part-owner of an Israeli-American company which has landed a shale oil exploration and production license covering 238 square miles in the Judean Hills and on occupied Syrian land, even though this is plainly illegal under international law?

Should not FOX News and Murdoch-owned news outlets disclose this hot story to their millions of viewers and readers? Should they not be made aware that the Murdoch-owned news outlets which generally support U.S. military action against Syria, do not inform their viewers and readers that the bossman has a vested interest in war and the overthrow of the Assad government in Damascus in order to further Genie’s oil exploration efforts in occupied Syria?

a reply to: Pseudosyntax

Not Hmm... WTF?

Same soup different bowl.

In their calls, Clinton emphasized the importance of encouraging career diplomats to stay in the foreign service following several resignations under Tillerson's tenure, Politico also reported. Last week, Clinton said she saw Trump's nomination of Pompeo as a "‘small glimmer of hope" given his successful leadership of the CIA.

from your link

a reply to: Aallanon

That's the point..

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I have never heard Rogers say anything to indicate he is a "good guy"

a reply to: Pseudosyntax

What if the original Michale Keaton Batman was more right than anyone knows -- it isn't any one chemical that does it, but the combination?

The more chemical your life, the more likely you are to suffer from it.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I have never heard Rogers say anything to indicate he is a "good guy"

He is the one who went against his superiors and saw Trump just after election. TRUMP moved his transition team out of Trump Tower right after that meeting. Rodgers is the proverbial snowball rolling down the mountain.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Sure there has you just reject it.
More than twenty allies have expelled Russian dignataries. These are not actions performed on a #ing whim.

Don't they?

How about the Brits accusing Russia of the nerve gas poisoning and then having to sort of walk it back when their lab concluded their was no real evidence the origin of the agent actually was Russia?

All they knew was that novichok was invented by Russians + Russia did poison the other spy with polonium, so they made a huge leap of reasoning to assume that the Russians had to have poisoned Skripal, even though the chemical formula for novichok was all over the place and could be made by any number of state level actors.

Opps! Bad UK! Does that mean Russia didn't do it? No, but it does mean they really have no smoking gun to say they did.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I have never heard Rogers say anything to indicate he is a "good guy"

He is the one who went against his superiors and saw Trump just after election. TRUMP moved his transition team out of Trump Tower right after that meeting. Rodgers is the proverbial snowball rolling down the mountain.

a reply to: ketsuko

Well, medications produced by pharma for terminal diseases work off of the buildup of the chemical in the bloodstream. It's not like the same buildup isn't problematic for other chemicals, and they do definitely have reactions to one another.

That why it's so important to watch what you put into your body. Water is fatal at the right dosage, and so is oxygen. It's not always about the chemical itself than it is a reaction or dosage at once, or over time.

a reply to: crankyoldman

So CIA is ousted and then Rothschild controlled Central Banks in, North Korea minerals worth trillions up for grabs.

Sounds like Trump is one of the Black Hats.

"The more things appear to change the more they stay the same"

When Trump visited SA, he watched, he said his body language said "no deals" in ME speak. DJT wasn't dealing I guess, shortly thereafter SA turned upside down.

Part two according to our history with Q is Syria = CIA and CIA in Iran. If they've sorted NK and are moving on those two CIA basis, whoa.

a reply to: crankyoldman

So CIA is ousted and then Rothschild controlled Central Banks in, North Korea minerals worth trillions up for grabs.

Sounds like Trump is one of the Black Hats.

"The more things appear to change the more they stay the same"

When Trump visited SA, he watched, he said his body language said "no deals" in ME speak. DJT wasn't dealing I guess, shortly thereafter SA turned upside down.

Part two according to our history with Q is Syria = CIA and CIA in Iran. If they've sorted NK and are moving on those two CIA basis, whoa.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: carewemust

How did Trump get a swamp creature like McConnell to agree to that?

I believe McConnell was briefed on the upcoming storm.

New Q:


This may be the @Snowden Q was addressing:


Looks like Q is suggesting we should expect a drop after Zuckerberg's testimony.

Hopefully they're allowing him to perjury himself

Anyone deciphering the Last drop? #1124

@Snowden
Yes.
Testify then drop.
We have it all.
These people are stupid.
Fireworks.
POTUS’ weekly address.
END.
Q

ETA: Nevermind

a reply to: Aallanon

I just was being more emphatic. That one story really says alot to me.
Q said trust:
Mueller
Rosenstein
Sessions
Etc.
All the people I don't trust. Then everyday I see people who are exactly the ones we are talking about getting hired, appointed, promoted. It doesn't make sense

Who has Q said to trust? anybody got a list? Well I don't trust them.

Obviously trump is saying trust Popmeo. He is asking HRC for advice? For real

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Someone rolled on McConnell or his wife -- she's in the cabinet after all.

a reply to: LurkNoMore
Re: MZ at Senate Committee:

His body language started changing when he was asked about Palantir and about whether FB employees worked with Cambridge Analytica during 2016 campaign.

Since that point he's been regularly looking down and to left after he's given an answer that is "economical with the truth"

ETA - there's also some weird lipsynching issues with MZ's responses.

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

This may be the @Snowden Q was addressing:

Right on Snowden. Getting tired of MSMs Zuckberg quote "We haven't done enough". Truth is, you haven't done ANYTHING to shield users privacy, nor did you ever intend to.

originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: Aallanon

I just was being more emphatic. That one story really says alot to me.
Q said trust:
Mueller
Rosenstein
Sessions
Etc.
All the people I don't trust. Then everyday I see people who are exactly the ones we are talking about getting hired, appointed, promoted. It doesn't make sense

Who has Q said to trust? anybody got a list? Well I don't trust them.

Obviously trump is saying trust Popmeo. He is asking HRC for advice? For real

Maybe I missed it but I didn't see that they said to trust Pompeo at all.