It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

HILLARY CLINTON - Cambridge Analytica Colluded with Russians to Make Me Lose. Election Was Rigged!.

page: 6
41
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 21 2018 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Now Canada colluded with Trump. Do we need a special counsel for this one too?



posted on Mar, 21 2018 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




I think it was the invisible illuminati Elephants that built Stonehenge. They used psychic power to make her lose. (Just getting the jump on this explanation because I am sure at some point Hillary will say it was this).



posted on Mar, 21 2018 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: openminded2011
a reply to: carewemust




I think it was the invisible illuminati Elephants that built Stonehenge. They used psychic power to make her lose. (Just getting the jump on this explanation because I am sure at some point Hillary will say it was this).


But that's only because the mystic transparent gorillas bullied them in to voting for Trump. Let's be honest though, she could blame Captain Morgan, and it would be totally valid. Just look at her drunk behavior.


edit on 21-3-2018 by Guyfriday because: Blah Blah Blah



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 05:14 AM
link   
I think it was the Grey Aliens that made Hillary lose! They had to have abducted the silent majority and program them all to vote Trump!



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 05:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: EchoesInTime

originally posted by: xuenchen
My God now she's defiling American Citizen voters again.

I think she might be cracking 😫


Look at what she says when asked about Ivanka being President one day. She can't hide her venemous contempt..the way she said it, the hatred spewed out.

"that's never going to happen" as if an undisputed fact,... and.." we don't need any more inexperienced Trumps in the white house."

video at link




Hillary is such a venomous, bitter old hag.
What she should understand is that quite the contrary to being the woman to 'break the glass ceiling' she has handicapped women running for President by representing the fairer sex so poorly.

edit on 22/3/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Hillary is such a venomous, bitter old hag.
What she should understand is that quite the contrary to being the woman to 'break the glass ceiling' she has handicapped women running for President by representing the fairer sex so poorly.

Hillary is the gift that keeps on giving....



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 08:23 AM
link   
Whatever happened to gracious in defeat, even her allies like the Young Turks, have condemned her as the worst candidate.
She needs to retire and and not be heard from again and just be an asterisk in the history books.

She is suffering from this

Projection (Psychological) An unconscious self-defence mechanism characterised by a person unconsciously attributing their own issues onto someone or something else as a form of delusion and denial.


edit on 22-3-2018 by Blue_Jay33 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 12:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: SecretsoftheBlueApples
Perhaps it could be that the old coc aine riddled lesbian Arabic witch of the east got hit in the face with a hot bag of nickels and always looks like Stephen Hawking doing a kegstand whilst walking down stairs...me thinks... And her breath smells of Human Abedin...
a reply to: carewemust



OMG, thanks I needed that laugh!



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: trollz


The best comedy mirrors reality.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

It was actually the British and here's the simple motive.

Dems wouldn't do a trade deal with the Tory/Conservative government if it were to leave the EU... plenty of articles on it, google it. Trump didn't have the same reservations.
Cambridge Analytica's work force are predominantly UK conservatives with links or even ex members of UK government(some say even MI6) with strong current links to the present UK government...
The poisoning of a spy just before Putin's election day.... more extreme version of what they did to Clinton. Obviously the Tory government got very confident after they managed to affect the US elections without being detected.






edit on 22-3-2018 by DreamerOracle because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-3-2018 by DreamerOracle because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 09:59 PM
link   
The term "humiliating defeat" seems like a bit of a misnomer since she garnered almost 4 MILLION MORE VOTES than the Orange-headed POS sitting in the presidents chair.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 10:10 PM
link   
a reply to: CT_Flyboy

I don't like Hillary. I don't like Trump.
But why does the left always resort to making fun of someones physical appearance that they don't like.
It's really cruel.



posted on Mar, 22 2018 @ 11:35 PM
link   
a reply to: CT_Flyboy

Why do you think that that means anything at all, when it, quite frankly doesn't mean a blessed thing.

The total number of votes is utterly without meaning in any context, other than sour grapes.



posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 07:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deluxe
a reply to: CT_Flyboy

I don't like Hillary. I don't like Trump.
But why does the left always resort to making fun of someones physical appearance that they don't like.
It's really cruel.




Because they are the loving, peaceful, tolerant left!



posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 07:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Too bad she won the popular vote then huh?
Because they hated her more than trump. Lol big joke .
And now. Even more people hate trump.
Will these trials be taking place before or after trumps impeachment which is for all intents and purposes already on the docket?



posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 07:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: CT_Flyboy

Why do you think that that means anything at all, when it, quite frankly doesn't mean a blessed thing.

The total number of votes is utterly without meaning in any context, other than sour grapes.



Total number of votes show that Trump is not as popular as Hillary, you surely can not deny that?

That is of course only taking to account the population who voted for those two



posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Whereismypassword

And? It means nothing. Even had I voted for her, it would mean nothing. I didn't vote for Trump, either. The guy I voted for finished fifth or sixth in my state...talk about a better luck next time scenario.

Trump was more popular in enough states to take the requisite number of electoral votes. Just as the Constitution mandates.

Was she more popular...truly? Or were those votes by folks who thought she would pay 'em back for those votes? Not the sort of popularity I'd be looking for personally. But, yeah, she did garner more popular votes nationwide...which won't even earn you a well done in American politics at the Presidential level.



posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Is that a default setting for many people? She won the nationwide popular vote. So? You know, as well as I, that that means nothing. It's not even worthy of a well done.

She did well in California...yup, she surely did. In New York...oh, my, yes. ...and that's where the majority of the margin in this mythical "national popular vote" win of hers came from. Two states.

Do we truly want, not saying you do, I don't recall you ever saying there should be a President selected in that fashion, our President, who ever it is/will be, essentially elected by California, New York, and maybe a couple of others? Disregarding in their entirety, the rest of the country?

That's a nightmarish scenario, at least to my mind, as a rural dweller in a state that isn't California or New York.

That would mean someone like Nancy Pelosi would actually have a chance in a presidential race...



posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 06:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: CT_Flyboy
The term "humiliating defeat" seems like a bit of a misnomer since she garnered almost 4 MILLION MORE VOTES than the Orange-headed POS sitting in the presidents chair.


Yeah, that and 8 bucks will get ya a coffee at starbucks.




posted on Mar, 23 2018 @ 06:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
March 20, 2018

Hillary Clinton just "brain-stormed" another reason for her humiliating 2016 defeat.

The former Democratic presidential candidate, who lost to Donald Trump, asked whether the Russians were “getting advice” from Cambridge Analytica during the 2015/2016 Presidential race.

Mrs Clinton told Channel Four News: “The real question is how did the Russians know how to target their messages so precisely to undecided voters in Wisconsin or Michigan or Pennsylvania – that is really the nub of the question.
The full whine at: www.telegraph.co.uk...

The "nub" is her brain. I think her excuses have now eclipsed the Clinton "body count"? Hillary should be focusing on preparing to defend herself against the criminal charges that 4 separate investigations will bringing to her life, in the not-too-distant future.

-CareWeMust


I think what's funny is nobody calling her out on suddenly knowing anything about anything related to IT after her "wipe with a cloth" bs...

I would have laughed her off the interview had she pulled this crap.



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join