It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'You don't think'...You didn't have to admit it...It's really obvious...
originally posted by: Whereismypassword
I don’t think trump can honestly play tiddly winks without realy concentrating with the tip of his tongue out from between his puckered lips
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: carewemust
According to them, yes he's a one-man army destroying everything. To a lot of his supporters he's the same thing except making everything better. Both are equally dumb.
originally posted by: carewemust
Yet he became fabulously wealthy, provided paychecks for thousands of people all over the world and earned the Presidency of the world's greatest nation.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
How many hotels do you own?
To call Trump stupid is itself stupid. He may be crude, but he is not stupid
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: carewemust
According to them, yes he's a one-man army destroying everything. To a lot of his supporters he's the same thing except making everything better. Both are equally dumb.
Your OPINION is noted.
The BIG CRIME is that there is a TRAITOR in the President's inner circle. That is why Trump put out the "I called Putin to congratulate him!", bait to the press. As we speak, Chief of Staff JOHN KELLY is closing in on the leaker. Only a few people would know about the "Do Not Call To Congratulate Putin" wording.
And, from what I heard, that wording was put there just for the purpose "baiting" the leaker. The daily briefing papers do not TELL President Trump what to say/not say. He would ignore it anyway, according to people who've worked there.
originally posted by: Harpua
I've heard it suggested that he would be richer by just putting his money in the bank with all of the bankruptcies he's had... it would be easier to argue on one side or the other if he would simply provide his tax returns.
originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: Tempter
I don't see that anyone's been canned. Leaks have been a constant problem with the White House, which usually indicates staff morale is low. I suspect McMaster won't last the year and I'd be surprised if Kelly's still there in a year.
originally posted by: Aazadan
What makes you think there's only one leaker? For that matter, what makes you think it was one of Trumps staff? One of Trumps go to tactics is to leak information himself. Sometimes he does it intentionally just to create news, and other times he does it unintentionally because he doesn't know how to keep his mouth shut.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Byrd
a reply to: Tempter
I don't see that anyone's been canned. Leaks have been a constant problem with the White House, which usually indicates staff morale is low. I suspect McMaster won't last the year and I'd be surprised if Kelly's still there in a year.
Leaks started day one so one hell of a morale drop in a day...lol
There were a lot of leftover staffers from Obama too that everyone of them most likely hated him for Hillary and what they saw as what should have been continued service with another democrat. I really don't think anyone sees working close with the President a bad thing, its a once in a lifetime event, so I think there is much more turmoil reported by the news than what actually is there. We also know that in any meeting, no matter how secret, if a democrat is in it, and many are, there is a bee line right to the press.