BOMBSHELL: Obama's DOJ Forced Deletion Of 500,000 Fugitives From Gun Background Check System

a reply to: underwerks

Warrants for what?

I don't believe that you have ever filled out a 4473 in your entire life.

Because, it you had, you'd know the answer is irrelevant. Having warrants out for your arrest is a disqualifying condition.

But you would know that, being such a supporter of the second amendment and all, and being so familiar with how guns are bought and sold...Right?

originally posted by: underwerks
So you all are angry that under Obamas DOJ half a million Americans who couldn't legally own guns before were given the right to?

Kind of strange seeing conservatives support the population being less armed. But then again, Obama.

BS

Its another example of "no new laws....enforce what we have already".

This in top of fast and furious plus what we heard about police soft handing nick cruz.....dont blame guns. Blame your government for failing to do their damned jobs.

a reply to: 3daysgone

You guys are still on Obama's as*? You should worry about your new God, Donald duck.

originally posted by: underwerks
So you all are angry that under Obamas DOJ half a million Americans who couldn't legally own guns before were given the right to?

Kind of strange seeing conservatives support the population being less armed. But then again, Obama.

Its not because we hate obama. In fact, this kind of thing is why we hate obama. Its the fact that responsible gun owners are in favor of background checks. I don't know any gun owners who do not agree with that policy. But we never get credit for that from people who are too busy demonizing us for owning guns in the first place.

You have to ask yourself why a sitting POTUS would intentionally use a philosophical technicality to put guns in the hands of 500,000 criminals.

a reply to: 3daysgone

OK.. I get it... Because what "wanted fugitive" would knowingly and voluntarily go in to buy a gun and knowingly fill out a form of any kind?

That deleting the names isn't/wasn't problematic.. Though a stupid losing move... and if anything... it was unnecessary.

Dum ass move overall.... Shoulve left it alone

MS
CPL holder

So does anyone have access to the list of names and could then verify if any of them committed a gun crime since?

THAT would be some news.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: 3daysgone

Absolutely.

If you want to have the populace give up their guns, you have to demonize gun owners, demonize gun advocacy groups, and create gun free zones.

After enough violence, people will be begging government to take their guns and the government will gladly oblige.

Government wants chaos so they will be asked to control and contain it.

Wow.
Where have we heard that before.
"Order out of Chaos. - A motto of the Thirty-third Degree, and having the same allusion as lux e tenebris, which see."

"https://books.google.com/books?id=VVBKAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA537&dq=ordo+ab+chao&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Z8dZUc2aIaSGjALCpoGIAw&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=ordo%20ab%2 0chao&f=false


DBC, you nailed it (again).

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: underwerks
So you all are angry that under Obamas DOJ half a million Americans who couldn't legally own guns before were given the right to?

Kind of strange seeing conservatives support the population being less armed. But then again, Obama.

BS

Its another example of "no new laws....enforce what we have already".

This in top of fast and furious plus what we heard about police soft handing nick cruz.....dont blame guns. Blame your government for failing to do their damned jobs.

Eloquently stated.
BTW, did I tell you that your avatar is the best one that you have chosen?

a reply to: 3daysgone

the Justice Department has issued a memo that forced the FBI NICS background check database to drop more than 500,000 names of fugitives with outstanding arrest warrants because it was uncertain whether those fugitives had fled across state lines."

Wow. If it is a felony it is also illegal for the fugitive to cross State lines. Even in the State they cross into
WTH ?

a reply to: Gothmog

So was this Obama's idea of how to get
more guns into the hands of known criminals?

a reply to: underwerks

IF they release a sample of names and if any of the shooters since Trump took office were on it, what would you honestly say?

You know full well the point of the OP isnt to point out a double standard of wanting people to have guns, rather pointing out the hypocrisy on the left over this and related issues.

I think its safe to say releasing 500k of anything in one swoop looks a little loose to be considered a safe move.

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: 3daysgone

You guys are still on Obama's as*? You should worry about your new God, Donald duck.

Welp fellas there it is. We shouldn't talk about Bush, Clinton, or Reagan either.

a reply to: 3daysgone
This was a plan by the Obama administration hoping to promote gun lawlessness so he could dismantle the second amendment. Obama has to be the biggest P.O.S. ever to be called President.

a reply to: 3daysgone

More reasons to not disarmed to the totalitarian left. They don't want to fix anything. They just want crisis after crisis so they can foment their anti american agenda and world government.

Dam right it's all about control

If the US lay down its arms

They'd be gone already

originally posted by: mekhanics
a reply to: 3daysgone

You guys are still on Obama's as*? You should worry about your new God, Donald duck.

Yes. His Legacy will be shown for exactly what it was. It wasn't a Legacy of supporting the interests of this country, as we can all see by the trade deals that doesn't benefit our own people, just as it has been going on for quiet a while now in our federal government.

I get the just that you don't like President Trump by how you referred to him as God. That makes you sound as if you are in a cult of people who think Trump is God. I mean you are free to believe how you believe, and that is fine. I would just like to know why you think President Trump is God? Just curious.

a reply to: mysterioustranger

OK.. I get it... Because what "wanted fugitive" would knowingly and voluntarily go in to buy a gun and knowingly fill out a form of any kind?

I have seen people who commit crimes do some pretty dumb things. The dead give away is the first dumb thing they do. Commit a crime.

That deleting the names isn't/wasn't problematic.. Though a stupid losing move... and if anything... it was unnecessary.

It would be very necessary if you owed some very big, south of the border, Fast and Furious, Crime Lord a favor. 500,000 thousand of them. I don't think it is nowhere near that amount. 10, possibly 20 thousand though? With the rate that heroin was coming into America it would have taken a lot of people to help get it through. What will they get for their troubles? How about becoming a citizen, I hear that's all the rage now.

Dum ass move overall.... Shoulve left it alone

Well he never thought Trump had a chance at becoming the President so I can't argue against the way you describe his decision making skills.

MS
CPL holder

I have no idea what that means. Sry.

a reply to: underwerks

Sorry, hypocrisy is on your side of the aisle here. Most conservatives favor taking guns from criminals.

a reply to: 3daysgone

Concealed Pistol License (CPL) holder. I legally carry, every-day, everywhere and am licensed and trained.

To the thread? It's still disconcerting these names were "deleted".

Thanks! MS