BOB MUELLER Frustrated - Now Trying Get Trump on CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD.

March 13, 2018

If this had come from a tabloid like CNN or Slate, it wouldn't be given second thought. But the conservative "American Thinker" publication is usually pretty accurate.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is invoking a new charge in his Captain Queeg search for the lost strawberries. He is looking to tie Trump and his aides to a "conspiracy to defraud the government" charge. What makes this so ominous, is that Mueller apparently doesn't have to tie it to a criminal action.

This puts a lot more of Trump's aides in danger of being ensnared in Mueller's ever widening net.

Nothing quite excites partisan investigators like the term "significant flexibility." This is great news for Mueller and the Democrats. Trump aides who never committed a criminal act could be caught up in Mueller's dragnet and sent to jail.

The "danger quotient" just shot up for the president and his aides.

FULL ARTICLE AT: www.americanthinker.com...

If President Trump determines that Bob Mueller is indeed this desperate, it might be less damaging if he immediately fired Mueller, rather than subject himself, his staff, and his family, to numerous "conspiracy to defraud" charges. What do you think ATS?

-CareWeMust

a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

Doesn't it all now depend upon, "intent"? After all, if someone doens't intend to break the law, then it is not worthy of prosecution. Isn't that the precedent that the former FBI Director set while within his tenure?

Or, does that only apply to a certain political party?

a reply to: carewemust

Conspiracy to commit fraud=didn't commit fraud.

Or to put it more succinctly, failed to break the law.

Words are fun!

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

He thought about thinking about it.

Conspiracy to commit conspiracy to defraud the government.

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

Reminds me of how witch-hunter KEN STARR impeached Bill Clinton. Starr Impeached Clinton for Lying about having consensual sex.

That was light-years away from the original investigation, which had something to do with White Water real estate investments, and Clinton friend Vince Foster being found dead.

a reply to: Krakatoa

Good point! If Mueller says that Trump and his people are guilty of "defrauding", he opens the door to charging many people in the Obama Administration. HE might not do it, but the precedent is then set for Sessions to.

a reply to: JinMI

Republicans are going to regret how their passive attitudes come back to haunt them in November. There's NO WAY Schumer and Pelosi would let President Hillary be dragged over the coals for so long, by a Special Counsel GOWDY, on a Hillary witch-hunt.

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

Doesn't it all now depend upon, "intent"? After all, if someone doens't intend to break the law, then it is not worthy of prosecution. Isn't that the precedent that the former FBI Director set while within his tenure?

Or, does that only apply to a certain political party?

If it was, you’d think HRC & Company would be in orange jump suits by now.

*shrug*

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

Doesn't it all now depend upon, "intent"? After all, if someone doens't intend to break the law, then it is not worthy of prosecution. Isn't that the precedent that the former FBI Director set while within his tenure?

Or, does that only apply to a certain political party?

It depends on how the individual law is written and enforced, not on political party.

a reply to: Pyle

not to use "whataboutism", but a precedent was set with Hillary who did break the law, but didn't "intend" to, therefore, no charges.

a reply to: JinMI

whats your attitude to :

" conspiracy to commit murder " ????

the reason i bring this up - is 25 years ago - 2 idiots decided to kill my then GF - fortunatly thier attemps to buy a firearm - ran headlong into a undercover police operation

they wen to prison - 0ne is apparently still inside

" so yes - words are fun - but " conspiracy to ................ " is still a valid criminal charge in many situations

My favoeite anti Trumpets

"He's a closet Democrat!!"

Uhh yeah don't you want a Democrat in office?

a reply to: carewemust

This is where Muellers career dies.

Awww I know things are looking bad for Little Donny Two Scoops, but don't worry! There's always Hillary, right guys??? Obama?? Anyone? Emails??

Muller better be careful. He was in charge during Uranium 1, and crap like this could be the impetus for Sessions to open up an investigation of Muller's history.

At some point, Muller will need to admit he failed on his mission to impeach Trump, and accept a spanking from the DNC.

a reply to: ignorant_ape

Could you show me the statute?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: notsure1
a reply to: carewemust

Well dam since we cant prove anything lets just say he thought about it.

Reminds me of how witch-hunter KEN STARR impeached Bill Clinton. Starr Impeached Clinton for Lying about having consensual sex.

That was light-years away from the original investigation, which had something to do with White Water real estate investments, and Clinton friend Vince Foster being found dead.

Heck of a smokescreen, that conspiracy thing. While
we're at it there were a bunch of stuff other countries
magically got that the US owed money to. Ken? Beuller?

I think it started as soon as we found out that China
owned a lot of our previously 'federal' land.. maybe sooner.

I think Mueller at this point ought to 'wait for the ricochet'
ala Ian Gilliam-- if he decides to file this one:
we've got 14 or so months of billings for prosecuting
what are evidently non-existent crimes and high booboos:
and the avenues of prosecution are so far off the res
already FOR the record, even some Dems in high places
are calling to think about calling the hunt off... Monday.
Last year. Guys? 13 Dems and 3 Indies, with no Repubs on
Mueller's hunting party = embarrassingly lopsided partisan.

Of course 'the other side are already playing 2nd Grade
mathematicians (finally) in the minority media.. and have
brilliantly deduced that this particularly blue-shifted box
a tools never wanted to 'Get Trump', but run cover for the
real stinkin' hootie in the room WSNBM [...hint M=Mentioned].

So where's the ketchup even, Mr. former FBI Director?
Anybody tired of 'Revenge/Spite Chicago Style' yet?

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: carewemust

This is where Muellers career dies.

he already retired from his career with a pension. it hardly died, but just make up crap like a good right-winger

originally posted by: crtrvt
Awww I know things are looking bad for Little Donny Two Scoops, but don't worry! There's always Hillary, right guys??? Obama?? Anyone? Emails??

they still want to impeach Hillary....too bad Trump doesn't have the balls hillary does, regarding Putin....trump is such a wussy that he fired his sec. of state by tweeting it.....he can't even stand up to the man and tell him to his face, because he is such a weak, whiny, little wimp.