Breaking News! third AATP UFO Video Has Been Released!

a reply to: elevenaugust

Is that the 'chain of custody' they describe in the TTSA version?

"We got it from Vimeo."

It's almost as if there's no awareness that people 'peer review' these releases and claims. I'm waiting for some Billy Meier footage to come down the pipe under the guise of 'solid chain of custody.'

If that is proof of alien craft in our atmosphere then we don't have a lot of proof..

Personally it looks like something that may not even be moving or moving slowly (the illusion effect) with an embellished lead in that tells you nothing at all, the info on the screen is obvious to most but it has no actual impact on the thing seen.

It literally could be a high altitude weather balloon..

Only one of the three released video's (the "its rotating" one) look remotely interesting

originally posted by: elevenaugust
This video was posted two years ago on Vimeo by "JEREMY KENYON LOCKYER CORBELL", described as "CORBELL / American contemporary artist and investigative filmmaker based in Los Angeles California. He documents extraordinary individuals and their beliefs.

vimeo.com...

Good find and a million stars for you mate, corbell himself is a very interesting guy too. Why was I expecting this though?

We used to say pics/vids or it didn't happen, how times have changed

a reply to: Kandinsky

If all this is not just of commercial nature aiming for profit, but rather a psyops campaign on a larger scale, then a possible rationale for all this would be "to revive the ridicule of the old days" as regards UFOs/UAPs.

Case in point: When presenting all of what TTSA has released until now to a group of scientists, you'd be the laughing stock of ufology. You probably wouldn't get more than "insufficient data" as a response.

Long story short: Even the Belgium wave of the 1990s had more impact on the field than TTSA. Heck, even Steven Greer (forgive me mentioning him here) accomplished more with his disclosure talks in the early 2000s as far as I'm concerned.

Still not holding my breath, but I'm curious to find out according to who's agenda we're being disinformed here.

originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: moebius

It's part of the history of ufology. Hermann Oberth wrote articles about UFOs and used their reported characteristics in how he approached rocketry. Closer to home, there are several prototypes of 'flying saucers' from Skunkworks whose top engineer at the time, Kelly Johnson, had reported seeing a flying saucer. The USAF tested similar and I've read a report from the 60s/70s that investigated the lift properties of the saucer design.

It's just one of those novelties you'll see within the overall literature of reports. Despite all the 'woo woo' dismissals, some of the reporters were convinced they had seen something extraordinary and it's human nature to be affected by such things.

I am aware of Oberth writing about UFOs. But I am not aware of him applying "their reported characteristics" to rocketry.

Kelly Johnson might have reported a flying saucer. But his designs were very terrestrial.

There have been a number of saucer shaped designs. But they relied on earthly aerodynamics.

a reply to: jeep3r

The Bigelow connection is about all there is to make it intriguing imo. He's like the King on a chessboard and the other guys are the pieces that always go with him.

If all this is not just of commercial nature aiming for profit, but rather a psyops campaign on a larger scale, then a possible rationale for all this would be "to revive the ridicule of the old days" as regards UFOs/UAPs.

Case in point: When presenting all of what TTSA has released until now to a group of scientists, you'd be the laughing stock of ufology. You probably wouldn't get more than "insufficient data" as a response.

It certainly looks like a possibility...or they have a very low opinion of those who follow these topics. I'd hesitate about the 'ridicule' angle if only because the field was in a coma and TTSA has somehow revived it. They could have been quiet and watched it flat-line.

I do share your curiosity though. It'll be interesting to see how all this plays out and whether it's a marketing ploy to sell merch and pan-handle.

a reply to: moebius

It's fine to disagree. I think you misread my post or misinterpreted it. In the midst of a wave of reports of saucer-shaped vehicles, aerospace companies began to design saucer-shaped airframes. They were inspired to study the lift properties of discs and, yes, they were obviously bound by terrestrial aerodynamics.

I wasn't saying, or implying, they somehow were building spaceships or using aerodynamics that weren't 'earthly.'

Certainly an interesting video, especially the reaction from a fighter pilot.

Googling the fastest drone:
The new DRL RacerX from the Drone Racing League set the Guinness World Record for the fastest ground speed by a battery-powered remote-controlled quadcopter, the league said Friday. The official record-breaking speed was recorded as 163.5 miles per hour. That's the private sector though, who knows what our government has.

I'm not a Delonge fan, his AMA here was a joke to put it nicely. "Don't question my knowledge kid, trust me I know important people and things."

People just aren't going to buy it until they see them with their own eyes. I've had one experience I can't explain or research, so I'll just keep looking up from time to time.

a reply to: gortex

What are you seeking for in ufology ,something that's the same in biology as us or craft that are made from nuts and bolts, I can only recommend stop searching because it ain't close to that..

a reply to: 0bserver1

I'm seeking evidence to support the ET hypothesis , nut's and bolts or not if it's happening there will be evidence of it happening.
My search continues.

Jeremy corbell has admitted that the video that appears to be on his Vimeo 2yrs ago is an old video that he reuploaded and replaced with the new TTSA video, so it does appear that it isn't already out there unless anyone else has seen it elsewhere.

So another old 60 second flir video with a small blob that could be anything from a bird to a drone, TTSA is the greatest thing to happen to disclosure since the "weather balloon"!!

a reply to: pigsy2400

Jeremy corbell has admitted that the video that appears to be on his Vimeo 2yrs ago is an old video that he reuploaded and replaced with the new TTSA video

A link to that admission would be helpful.

At first I was cautiously optimistic about this TTSA stuff. Then I started to become very sceptical. Now I'm starting to think their agenda is basically exactly what they're saying it is...I think they are trying to raise funds to study the phenomenon, because the government is isn't capable of applying the proper resources and study that is needed. Unfortunately, the public may be too jaded to achieve that goal.

a reply to: Zadiel74


I think TTSA are raising funds to start a bird and plane watching group as that's all that's been posted by those comedians so far!

a reply to: gortex

Ah glad to see a die hard that seeks the answers based on self education and physical evidence, although I know that part you've probably passed already.

Now it's time to move on to the second stage.
Keep on doing what urges the questions.

At the end its all that individual quest we have to endure I guess. ..

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: pigsy2400

Jeremy corbell has admitted that the video that appears to be on his Vimeo 2yrs ago is an old video that he reuploaded and replaced with the new TTSA video

A link to that admission would be helpful.

Yes, apparently someone from Reddit asked Jeremy Corbell: Jeremy told me via twitter: "It’s just a recent upload replacing an old video I didn’t need anymore. Nothing mysterious." You can replace old videos on vimeo. This is true. It just seems odd to me he'd decide to do that with the Go Fast video."

Here's the Tweet.

Didn't knew that it was possible to replace old videos on Vimeo by keeping the same upload date; anyway If find it somewhat confusing... And sorry if I caused some confusion with my post.

Either way, I do not see any reason not to believe Jeremy Corbell, so it must be true.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: elevenaugust

Good to see you still around mate.

Thank you Gortex While I'm not present here as I would like to be, ATS is still like my second home.

Is there any other background to read about this? Where's the rest of the video? I doubt the govt only have 1 minute clips. Same for the other ones they released.

They should make public knowledge their intent on releasing videos that were released years ago. Are they trying to say that being re-released by following a CoC that they can verify it (including the voices in the video) are 100% legit? Otherwise I don't get the point of releasing previous videos as if something new.

Also more scientific data to go along with these videos would be a great help. Just releasing videos that have been seen before accomplishes nothing.

As far as the video itself, no way that is a bird imo. Anyone know off hand what temperature black mode would pick up a hot object? This object shows up as cold. But no flapping I can see at all.. and I'd think at the speed it at least appears to be travelling, it would need to be flapping to keep it up, especially flying so close to the water - not much lift there from the air, I'd think. Also if it were just a bird, and the radar picked up on it that easily (and automatically), their radar would be going nuts locking onto all the ridiculous # of birds over the ocean and in the sky. Also the reactions from the pilots.. I'd guess they see birds all the time, and would not freak out to that degree over a simple bird flying over the water.

I think the best evidence in all of this, and the main reason to believe, is the pilot comments and statements. Especially the statements from Fravor. I believe them, and I don't think they're misidentifying the things they're witnessing.