-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

For some reason someone is winning but its not them :>)

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
It's being reported on the Twitter threads that the Senate Judiciary Committee has "invited" Jack Dorsey (Twitter), Larry Page (Google), and The Mighty Zuck (Facebook) to testify on April 10th. I hope they get drilled about censorship; it'll be fun to watch them squirm.

This whole Cambridge analytica, Facebook, Twitter, subject feels like a planted and orchestrated distraction.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is supposed to be focusing on determining crimes committed by people in the Obama Administration. And the Clinton Foundation.

These congressmen are only in Washington 138 days per year.

Even more on the Omar Mateen/FBI front. They are lurching toward potential mistrial there. It has come to light that not only was Mateen's father an FBI informant, but that the FBI knew about Mateen before local law enforcement called them with concerns about him!

The trial continued this morning, and the defense pounced on the FBI. Krista Torralva, a reporter with the Orlando Sentinel, reports that FBI agent Juvenal Martin testified that the bureau considered developing Omar Mateen as a separate source, and were informed that Omar had made repeated threats and bragged about his connections to al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood:

The FBI wanted Mateen as their own source!

a reply to: the2ofusr1

I started watching this just before you posted and everyone here should watch as well. If nothing else it gives a potential new puzzle/riddle to unravel. They claim to know who Q is/is not. I would have to watch again.

As to your post below saying it looks to coordinated, I disagree. I found it rambling. True the lady spoke about parts she was familiar with but he, being a cryptographer, spoke from his expertise. I actually wish it was more coordinated

Thanks for posting it.

Austin bomber a psychopath with no clear motive except chaos.

... but roommate remains a person of interest being questioned?

Hmmm ...

Suspicious Packages Found at Several Military Installations in D.C. Area

The military is investigating suspicious packages with apparent explosive components at several U.S. military installations in the Washington, D.C., area Monday, a law enforcement official said.

If this turns out to actually be explosives, I wonder how they match up to the Austin TX bombs?
Same bomb maker? Perhaps the person they killed in Austin was not the correct person.

a reply to: WhatTheory

Or there's an underground movement and there's a reason why the roommate in Austin remains a person of interest.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

i don't know greenanon
good luck storming the castle

a reply to: the2ofusr1

I endeavoured to watch your last few youtube vids.

Isn't it curious how often "altmedia" sites who follow Q always claim to have "the inside track" to who Q is?

I have trouble getting vids to play through as I am on limited satellite wifi now for the month because my kids watch constant youtube lol.

I find I prefer to read content, also it is amazing how much time some of these people take to get across their message!

Price I pay for being in the middle of nowhere, BUT it's worth it!! 👇

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: WhatTheory

Or there's an underground movement and there's a reason why the roommate in Austin remains a person of interest.

It was confirmed that the packages did contain explosives.
Packages with explosive material sent to military installations in DC area

Multiple suspicious packages containing explosive material were sent to at least three military installations in the Washington, D.C. area, a senior defense official told Fox News Monday.

Now to see if they match the Austin bombs.
Do you think they will tell the truth if there is a match? I'm not so sure.

US, EU expel more than 100 Russian diplomats over Skripal case

Fool me once, Honey...

Declassified Files Reveal Plot to Carry Out Soviet False Flag Attacks in US to Start War

Ah, sugar, sugar:

@#$%^&*! disgusting

Putin is Trump's candy girl!

...but "not made of sugar."

a reply to: tiredoflooking

They forget that a simple search will tell them who/what Q is. We (this thread) have known this for months.

Q = www.thedailybeast.com...

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
I also just wanted to say this.

These people are probably the ones getting Trump's "affairs" to come forward.

Saying she lacks credibility is an understatement.

Reportedly, she has three times
denied she had sex with Trump, but that
is not the least of her problems. Her story is full
of holes, lots of contradictions. Her body language
is also indicative of someone who is lying.

2006, she stated that she never had a sexual relationship
with Trump

2011, she stated that she never had a sexual relationship
with Trump

January 2018 – this year – she stated that she never had
a sexual relationship with Trump. She specifically put in writing,
“My involvement with Donald Trump was limited to a few
public appearances and nothing more.”

A lot of this can be explained in this way; for a
person of her caliber and wear and tear any publicity
is good publicity, and this helps the Democrats
in a short term way, with a possible tie in to
Mueller if he was waiting for this as part of
"the insurance plan".

Michael Avenatti, her attorney once worked for Barack Obama’s
White House Chief of Staff and current Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Avenatti has sued Trump before....this is nothing new.
Sleaze bag lawyer he is ....

www.nydailynews.com...

a reply to: burntheships

If you're talking about Stormy Daniels, she probably has brain damage. That's one reason how she could sit under bright lights, with dilated pupils, without the lights hurting her eyeballs. (I have no desire to see the interview, but that's what's been reported...dilated pupils.)

a reply to: carewemust

Syphilis, it's a bad thing....destroys the body after a time,
including the brain...

Rumo rs Paul Ryan to resign as House Speaker. Scalise to replace?

Of course, we've heard these rumors before.

a reply to: WhatTheory

They've been awful quiet about the roommate.

a reply to: burntheships

You forgot to mention her criminal record for violent domestic abuse.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Well that looks like a little slice of heaven to me.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: burntheships

You forgot to mention her criminal record for violent domestic abuse.

I did not know....
Please, don't keep me waiting in suspense.

Lets hear it!