-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: purplemer

We have seen that Q is a Trump insider or small team, so it's relevant.

Much as rolled out of it, and there'll be more to follow. A million or more are now actively researching and watching current events and news very closely. Wouldn't have happened otherwise. Pressure's on the right people, groups and orgs.

It's ok to ask questions and probe, but the one thing that i find absolutely abhorrent and intolerable are those with extreme contempt, prior to investigation, even a kind of seething ire and snarkiness bordering on hatred. That has no place here whatsoever.

Was following Q before it hit ATS. I have asked questions and had contempt aimed at me for asking questions.

A million people are doing what. I have seen a lot of illusion de grandeur on this thread. Q makes a drop and fifty different interpretations appear. So what exactly does this reseach acheive if its not verified. It creates a lot of flase narratives. Plenty examples in this thread if you look with a discerning eye.

Something is going on. Yes thats for sure. But its not what you think. Change is coming but it wont be how you think. You are being duped into creating fake news. Five months and you know what?

a reply to: Jusvistn

I made the mistake after the Bridge in Florida collapsed, of having a knee jerk reaction that somehow Q had foreknowledge. Considering we had already come up with much better explanations, such as the book, "The Bridge" about Obama, it really was a lame conclusion. Now we have the FBI and others making those same sort of connections about the Booms and Texas bombings, when there are much better explanations of what Q is referring to, such as McCabe being fired and other big news coming out.

It's actually more likely that if some sort of false flag operation is behind these bombings ( MK-ultra triggered ? ) maybe it's meant to discredit #TheStorm movement and make people believe it's dangerous. IDK, I wouldn't participate in anything I believed was responsible for "terrorist" activities and feel bad I lost the Faith for a min. in the work we are doing.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

Agree.

Now that the Dems aren't in control, the control mechanism is tightening. But, they already have the goods. It's like closing the barn door after the cows are out.

These kinds of "data breaches" always remind me of that Big One in 2014 of the Office of Personnel Management. It was HUGE and the kind of info taken was more than just contacts and SSNs. Even DNA was stolen. We had a great discussion about it Here.

a reply to: purplemer

I can't disagree with your view at all.

In fact, if one assumes it is all fake, the power such a thing has had is something to be studied for a very long time.

I also dislike the no-doxx concept. If you're actively mobilizing thousands of people (if not more) to believe in some elaborate deep state shenanigans, I think we have a right to seek the identity of the source.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's always been my interpretation that "Boom!" refers to big news events. Previous booms were connected to prominent resignations, and other events that Q had predicted. Q has warned about FF events being used to change the narrative. He/she/they are not behind the FF events.

Nobody on this thread has a clue what boom means as it is open to interpretation and cannot be verified. What can you learn from this.

originally posted by: tallcool1
So now that I'm caught up, does anyone have any idea regarding #958 - "They will fail. We know the details [Wednesday]?

I think Q is saying that they know the MSM is going to try to suggest Q is responsible for the bombings. We're seeing the beginnings of this today on social media, including here in this thread.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

I would have loved it, too. But the CIA has invested too much money in their surveillance network to let it collapse overnight.

a reply to: MountainLaurel

I made the mistake after the Bridge in Florida collapsed, of having a knee jerk reaction that somehow Q had foreknowledge. Considering we had already come up with much better explanations, such as the book, "The Bridge" about Obama

For most of Qs post. You can only ever have interpretation.Never a fact. Now thats not always the case inside the web of interpretation you will find facts linked to real life events. These are the cherries that keep everyone hooked looking for the truth.

Your lack of verifable sources means you become a tool to spread fake news.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

That makes sense. If that's the case, it also possibly shows that Q knew that the guy was being watched and it wouldn't be long before he was caught. Thanks!

a reply to: purplemer

It is an interesting ride to say the least. This isn't a game, but the "game" isn't over yet.

What would you get if you fed an AI some cryptic intelligence drops, some major news happenings, and discussions/research from high-functioning discussion board participants? Future proving past? A way to more accurately predict future events?

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: purplemer

I can't disagree with your view at all.

In fact, if one assumes it is all fake, the power such a thing has had is something to be studied for a very long time.

I also dislike the no-doxx concept. If you're actively mobilizing thousands of people (if not more) to believe in some elaborate deep state shenanigans, I think we have a right to seek the identity of the source.

Thank you for your reply.

Its not all fake there have been some gems of truth in it all too. A power shift is occurring. Thats a fact. Who is going to fill in the power vacuum. We can all hope its flowers and bells as Q says. But history says things can be very different.

People really should be asking before its too late.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: MountainLaurel

I made the mistake after the Bridge in Florida collapsed, of having a knee jerk reaction that somehow Q had foreknowledge. Considering we had already come up with much better explanations, such as the book, "The Bridge" about Obama

For most of Qs post. You can only ever have interpretation.Never a fact. Now thats not always the case inside the web of interpretation you will find facts linked to real life events. These are the cherries that keep everyone hooked looking for the truth.

Your lack of verifable sources means you become a tool to spread fake news.

Yeah so many Fake News. Loop Capital,Chicago connections,Barrick Gold,Trudeaufoundation suddenly changing their symbol,Frank Guistra and so much more. Seriously i don't know whom you followed but it sure wasn't this Q. Pol got overrun with copycats and fakes prior to Q moving to Infinity.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: purplemer

It is an interesting ride to say the least. This isn't a game, but the "game" isn't over yet.

What would you get if you fed an AI some cryptic intelligence drops, some major news happenings, and discussions/research from high-functioning discussion board participants? Future proving past? A way to more accurately predict future events?

It is very interesting and it is a mix of major news happenings, intelligence and vagueness. Pop that on discussion boards and you have a fog horn of fake news.

Interesting how the Donald seems to get slatted on msn by fake news. Is this his way of getting his own back. It may well be but I think there is more at play here.

a reply to: tjack

That logo appeared earlier in the thread; red on white background.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

You have not understood my axiom. Try rereading my posts. How can you claim to understand the coded language of Q whilst failing to understand clear speak.

I am aware Q speaks truth. I have said that. Its not good holding up a few golden nuggets to the bright blue sky and say here is the truth! I can give you more examples of Q sharing truth. What does that help. If you want to understand look for the lies, look for the unverified post of which there are many.

As I have said Q spreads truth and lies with a large dollop of vagueness thrown in the vat for good measure. You my friend have enjoyed this soup so much that you are now on your third bowl. Does it still taste good. How long before your tast bud are discerning enough to put down the bias and see it for what it is.

When Q asks peeps to spread the information how can they when it has not been verified. The result of spreading subjective information is fake news.

Now ask yourself this. Is fake news a dish you would serve to your own mother.

a reply to: purplemer

I already proved that Q is the real deal to myself so i don't need you telling me what is really going on. The whole onslaught on everything Q related is proof that people in certain places take them seriously enough to shutdown message boards. How about you ask Reddit CBTS_stream why they got shutdown? Apparently they dropped one "wrong" name and Reddit pulled the plug. The same happened to Pol when anons dropped BP's name. Way too much effort goes into this to discredit Q. You know what happens when people try too hard to debunk something? It strengthens the resolve of others to dig even deeper.

More rats leaving the sinking social media ship. Twitter’s chief information security officer is leaving the company

Twitter’s chief information security officer is leaving the company, sources familiar with the matter have told The Verge. Michael Coates, who joined the company in January 2015, is quitting to start his own company, sources said. Coates announced the move internally about three weeks ago, sources said, but had not announced the move externally.

Twitter declined to comment.

News of Coates’ departure comes on the same day that Michael Zelewski, director of information security engineering at Google, announced his departure from that company after 11 years. And it comes two days after reports that Alex Stamos, Facebook’s chief security officer, plans to leave the company in August. The departures come at a time when tech companies are under mounting pressure to prevent their platforms from being misused by foreign governments and other bad actors ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: tallcool1
So now that I'm caught up, does anyone have any idea regarding #958 - "They will fail. We know the details [Wednesday]?

I think Q is saying that they know the MSM is going to try to suggest Q is responsible for the bombings. We're seeing the beginnings of this today on social media, including here in this thread.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

I would have loved it, too. But the CIA has invested too much money in their surveillance network to let it collapse overnight.

Unfortunate, but you are so right. People are not going to let go of precious social media so easily either.

It wouldn't matter if they knew, and they should because we have been told many times, that everything one says or does on "free" search engines, email and social media is recorded for analysis and stored. Probably much more than that...people do not care.

We are paying for these services, they are not "free". We pay with our privacy.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

kekers. In others words you have failed to understand my axiom. No you have not proven Q is the real deal. You have simply shown a disability to engage with opinions and views different to your own.

So you now know Q is the real deal because they shut down a message board and this is based on a 'Apparently' You have digressed. That does not really prove anything apart from the fact that you are happy to base your theories on very shakey ground without real foundation.

Now i can clearly see you are confused on the subject. Its not my place to convince you. Its up to you to have a discerning mind if you so wish or of course I could always offer you a fourth bowl of that fake news soup yo so much enjoy eating.

For the last time I am not trying to debunk. Q speaks truth thats a fact!. He also speaks lies and a lot inbetween.

See if for what it is!

More soup vicar.
:-)

a reply to: Perfectenemy

More rats leaving the sinking social media ship. Twitter’s chief information security officer is leaving the company

Someone is leaving twitter. What does that prove. Did Q specifically mention this person or is this an unsubstantiated link on you part.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

I already proved that Q is the real deal to myself so i don't need you telling me what is really going on

There is a word for that! Something you can prove to yourself but not to anyone else. Do you know what that word is.