-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: CoramDeo

What if Huma is working as a mole inside HRC's camp? As far as i'm aware of nothing negative happened to her after Weiner and the Laptop got busted. She could be signaling white hats that she is still recording everything or that she has something new to share and is ready to leave it at a drop-off point.

Obviously Hillary still trusts her. Or maybe she doesn't? (Keep your enemies closer?)

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Hmm. Is it even considered a conspiracy if you are privy to information that noone else has?

I don't know, is it?

Q presents me with an opportunity to find more about the how and why me of all people.

Why would he single you out?

There is no going back for me now.

Where are you heading?

Here's a fun fact:

Former CIA director Allen Dulles (JFK fired him over the Bay of Pigs fiasco) rented a house in Georgetown on "Q" street!

househistoryman.blogspot.com...

originally posted by: nhanon

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT

Except she seems to have broken her wrist. I am guessing it was when she broke her fall on the stairs?

clones can break their wrist must be still perfecting the process

50/50 there is no broken wrist 🤨

Nobody going go address Rosiantate's post ? Sorry if im mispelling the name



Is that illegal? What the article suggests?

a reply to: eisegesis

The how and why has nothing to do with Q and what they are trying to accomplish. I'm hoping this group will lead me to something else entirely and help me to make sense of it. I have no idea if it will work but i have to at least try.

Where are you heading? Nowhere.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: eisegesis

Where are you heading? Nowhere.

Heading towards enlightenment.

originally posted by: samuelsson
Nobody going go address Rosiantate's post ? Sorry if im mispelling the name

Is that illegal? What the article suggests?

Ethical? Certainly not.

Legal? Hard to say.

If people are participating in personality quizzes by choice and giving permission to access their account data (even without realizing it) is where legality gets a little blurry. Very disconcerting though.

Interesting. I just typed another post and after hitting send the site crashed. Hmm.

originally posted by: samuelsson
Nobody going go address Rosiantate's post ? Sorry if im mispelling the name

Is that illegal? What the article suggests?

Second try. Good thing i copy my posts before i hit send.

That's what social media was created for in the first place. It happens to all our personal information and it goes straight to corporations like Twitter,Google or Facebook. We get put in little profile categories and then the information gets sold to the highest bidder. They don't even needed to trick people because they give them the information for free and no longer care about their privacy. Just take a look at all the people who brought a spy tool into there homes without even thinking about the consequences. Information is like currency to them. Twitter got exposed for saving inappropriate but private pics on servers. Did anyone care? Nope. They just ignored it and tweeted the next stupid hashtag.

Facebook is fully aware of this and suddenly it's against their rules. They have done it for years and now because it's about Trump they pretend to care. Hypocrites all of them.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: nhanon

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT

Except she seems to have broken her wrist. I am guessing it was when she broke her fall on the stairs?

clones can break their wrist must be still perfecting the process

50/50 there is no broken wrist 🤨

I'm thinking it's more like 90/10...being generous with the 10, too.

a reply to: eisegesis

Q would single someone out because where we go one we go all.

They're heading to the Kingdom in faith.

Who are you to say otherwise?

I dont think you see Jesus... yet

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: nhanon

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT

Except she seems to have broken her wrist. I am guessing it was when she broke her fall on the stairs?

clones can break their wrist must be still perfecting the process

50/50 there is no broken wrist 🤨

I'm thinking it's more like 90/10...being generous with the 10, too.

HRC seems to be the clumsiest person on the planet. I don't buy it though.

originally posted by: IseeJesus
a reply to: eisegesis

Q would single someone out because where we go one we go all.

They're heading to the Kingdom in faith.

Who are you to say otherwise?

I dont think you see Jesus... yet

Nah it's not Eisegesis fault. I just didn't clarify it enough. Sorry for the confusion and i'm not religious at all.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: IseeJesus
a reply to: eisegesis

Q would single someone out because where we go one we go all.

They're heading to the Kingdom in faith.

Who are you to say otherwise?

I dont think you see Jesus... yet

Nah it's not Eisegesis fault. I just didn't clarify it enough. Sorry for the confusion and i'm not religious at all.

Faith in a higher power and religion is not the same. Worth noting anyways.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: nhanon

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT

Except she seems to have broken her wrist. I am guessing it was when she broke her fall on the stairs?

clones can break their wrist must be still perfecting the process

50/50 there is no broken wrist 🤨

I'm thinking it's more like 90/10...being generous with the 10, too.

HRC seems to be the clumsiest person on the planet. I don't buy it though.

They're used to not having to try too hard to fool the sleepy masses. That's why they make those elementary mistakes like using the same ruse one too many times. Brainwashed minds do not notice things like that. Hence the similarities among all the false flag events and subsequent coverups, among other things. The fact that all of their technology depends on AI doesn't help their case, either. They spent so much time convincing humanity that the seat of consciousness lies in the programmable human brain that sometimes I think they've convinced themselves of the same fallacy.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: nhanon

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT

Except she seems to have broken her wrist. I am guessing it was when she broke her fall on the stairs?

clones can break their wrist must be still perfecting the process

50/50 there is no broken wrist 🤨

I'm thinking it's more like 90/10...being generous with the 10, too.

HRC seems to be the clumsiest person on the planet. I don't buy it though.

She's clumsy like a fox.

She uses these injuries for sympathy, msm distraction stories from her 'shooting herself in the foot' comments and to mask other things she doesn't want people to see or discuss.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

If people are participating in personality quizzes by choice and giving permission to access their account data (even without realizing it) is where legality gets a little blurry. Very disconcerting though.

The legality of this is quite clear.

Use of FB, Twit, or ATS is enetered into under a contract outlined by the terms and conditions of the site.

If the T&C's of the site says that your information can be used, or sold to third parties, then it is legal. You can pretty much guarantee that that is buried inthe T&C's. That's why there is a facebook.

Consider:

The requisite elements that must be established to demonstrate the formation of a legally binding contract are:

(1) offer (FB will allow you to connect with friends and family)
(2) acceptance (I choose to use this wonderful service)
(3) consideration (FB allows acccess to the site)
(4) mutuality of obligation (FB allows access to the service as long as you abide by the T&Cs)
(5) competency and capacity
and, in certain circumstances (you are 18 years old, and are not of diminished mental capaity)
(6) a written instrument. (The "I Agree" button acts like a signature for agreements in electronic format)

Congratulations, you just signed away your right to privacy.

The only gray area rests with number (5) in that people in the US under the age of 18 cannot enter into a legal contract. They are deemed to not be competent, and lack the campacity to do so. I would agrue that many people over the age of 18 do not have the capacity either, but that's the law. If there are facebook users under 18 that got caught up in this, there may be some case for legal action, but the only ones who get compensated are the lawyers.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Does anyone read the fine print of the agreements they agree to in any online game for instance or do they just click "agree" as fast as they can to get to the good stuff?

Sometimes, you really should read.

A lot of people have a who cares attitude because they cannot conceive of the ways that information can be used. Your grocery rewards card, for example. They use it to track your purchasing habits. On the one hand, it's great that they know what you buy so they can stock the things you want to purchase, but who has access to that information and what other uses could it be put to?

What information can educational data tracking be put to? They're datamining disciplinary data in order to try to reach equity in discipline right now because they're operating off of several false premises including the one that disciplinary actions in schools are mostly racially driven in negative way. That all children misbehave equally badly and the disparity exists solely because teachers are racist and punish black children and Native American children for being black and Native American.

This is creating chaos in the schools because the reality is far more complex.

But data can be used ... and misused in all kinds of ways.

a reply to: IseeJesus

Q would single someone out because where we go one we go all.

Well, you got that part right at least. So good for you.