It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: wanderingconfusion
As soon as I made my last post my computer froze and then I was directed here. I took a pic because it freaked me out.
originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: carewemust
At this rate they’ll have to close this thread in the high 200s.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: carewemust
At this rate they’ll have to close this thread in the high 200s.
IMO, Q material is so profound and far-reaching that there should be one thread per subject (or posting date), on a dedicated stand-alone full-featured Q forum.
Both the real estate tycoon and former Secretary of State are the direct descendants of 14th century 1st Duke of Lancaster John of Gaunt and his third wife Katherine Swynford, according to the ancestry site MyHeritage.com.
Various other descendants of Gaunt would claim his lineage to Edward III during the War of the Roses, a conflict that makes today's political scandals seem laughably tame in comparison.
The more I read the more hopelessly I went astray, until Divine Providence at length prompted me to undertake a journey to Italy, and caused me to be accepted as a disciple by that noble and marvellously learned Master Raymond, with whom I remained for a long time. In his eyes I found such favour that he not only unfolded to me a partial knowledge of this Great Mystery, but at my most earnest entreaty, accompanied me to this island of England, and lived with me here two years. During his stay he thoroughly instructed me in the whole secret of the work. - Abbott John Cremer and Edward's "Merlin"
originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: carewemust
post 677
so I am not understanding why he was mentioned in post 952
Could there be a clue in something he said/wrote?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: IAMTAT
The Argentinian sub.
Crew was taken hostage now freed.
JFK mentioned shattering the CIA into thousand pieces.
Gina Haspel confirmed white hat.
Good connection.
1000 pieces could also refer to # of intended Q Posts.
If so, 48 to go.
originally posted by: TomLawless
I am having the hardest time understanding the John Perry Barlow crumbs. So many conflicting opinions, and there aren't any real crumbs.
I've just about given up on that angle.
Who controls social media?
Who performs in a circus?
Who wrote the code to embed and censor across multiple platforms?
Why Russia?
Why China?
Why HK?
Why did ES (himself) arrange a C-link in multiple countries?
Learn.
Q
Plantagonet?
Now were talking Merovingian bloodline and you know what that means.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
I'm pretty sure March Madness refers to the MSM getting trolled and send on wild goose chases. McMaster is not getting fired. Sarah Sanders
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: carewemust
At this rate they’ll have to close this thread in the high 200s.
IMO, Q material is so profound and far-reaching that there should be one thread per subject (or posting date), on a dedicated stand-alone full-featured Q forum.
The Washington Post quotes “five people with knowledge of the plans”. Except there’s a problem, there are no plans. No plans except to entrap staff and intelligence community leakers; likely those five ‘leakers’ are in/around the National Security Council, and they just got caught.