It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nickn3
Space X just pulled one of the greatest engineers feat of all time, I guess someone is jealous.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Shes not wrong..
originally posted by: ARM1968
originally posted by: Nickn3
Space X just pulled one of the greatest engineers feat of all time, I guess someone is jealous.
Totally agree.
Not only that but Tesla got people excited about a rocket launch, about space. When was the last time NASA really captured the public excitement? They even managed to lose it during the Apollo missions.
The money they’ve had over the years, we should be on Mars. I bet they’ll want Tesla’s data about the Van Allen belts.
originally posted by: BotheLumberJack
‘We have to figure out how to work closely, how to move forward in a collaborative posture so we don’t have another red Roadster up there in orbit.’
originally posted by: Spacespider
NASA want to claim space for them self..
originally posted by: GraffikPleasure
a reply to: BotheLumberJack
Also... putting a Tesla on Mars may be a gimmick to some, but it could give regular people a clue to the climate and how something regular as a car would react to the air.
All I’m saying is there may be more to it. That could also be in part why NASA is truly pissed... exposure
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Reydelsol
And tell me, in five hundred years, six hundred, a thousand, do you think that we will still be messing around in our planetary front yard, or do you think we will have begun expansion? When expansion really kicks in hard, do you think that we will be more or less likely to encounter objects we have flung out for a laugh?