It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Edumakated
Because the vast majority of people wind up getting married and having kids. With kids, you need more space and good schools. Neither of these are typically available when renting apartments.
A house is a store of wealth. It is a stable and in most cases, appreciating asset. When you pay the mortgage off, you have that equity and when you sell it is real money.
I bought my first place in 2003. I sold it two years later and made $80,000 on the sale. here is the kicker... I put ZERO down when I did that. If I had chosen to rent, I would have pissed away two years of rent and had nothing to show for it.
My current home hasn't appreciated a ton, but I have been in it 13 years now. It will be paid off entirely in about another 10 years, maybe sooner. The house is worth about $600,000. That is real net worth. When I sell that is money that will help set my kids up for a better opportunities than I had. I could also do a reverse mortgage and live off that equity in retirement.
Waiting to buy a home in your 50s isn't a bright idea as most people are nearing retirement. The goal then is to reduce your housing expense, not increase it. By that time, most folks are nearing having their mortgages paid off.
originally posted by: luke1212
a reply to: DD2029
buying a home is the single best investment a person can make. i didn't even bother to watch the video as i was a renter for 30 years and a homeowner now. i am completely out of debt, the money i was making in rent then house payments now goes to a savings account for emergency's /repairs on my home. taxes on my home is about equal to 2 months rent i was paying before. only a fool would think that renting is better then buying.
originally posted by: DD2029
You clearly haven't seen the movie Money Pit.
originally posted by: DD2029
originally posted by: Edumakated
Because the vast majority of people wind up getting married and having kids. With kids, you need more space and good schools. Neither of these are typically available when renting apartments.
A house is a store of wealth. It is a stable and in most cases, appreciating asset. When you pay the mortgage off, you have that equity and when you sell it is real money.
I bought my first place in 2003. I sold it two years later and made $80,000 on the sale. here is the kicker... I put ZERO down when I did that. If I had chosen to rent, I would have pissed away two years of rent and had nothing to show for it.
My current home hasn't appreciated a ton, but I have been in it 13 years now. It will be paid off entirely in about another 10 years, maybe sooner. The house is worth about $600,000. That is real net worth. When I sell that is money that will help set my kids up for a better opportunities than I had. I could also do a reverse mortgage and live off that equity in retirement.
Waiting to buy a home in your 50s isn't a bright idea as most people are nearing retirement. The goal then is to reduce your housing expense, not increase it. By that time, most folks are nearing having their mortgages paid off.
Okay but don't you ever worry about having all your assets tied to that one house?
if that $600k house is 75% of your net worth (25% in a IRA)... that's not a good diverse portfolio.
what if the neighborhood goes to $hit? Look at what happened in Houston... how are those real estate values doing after getting hit by a hurricane?
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: DD2029
You clearly haven't seen the movie Money Pit.
Oh I know a money pit. I live in one. A cottage built in 1730. It sucks up money, but it's mine.
The house is mine and I can do what I like - within reason. In a few year, should I wish, I can sell up and move on. You cannot do that if you spend your life renting.
originally posted by: mkultra11
Some people have no choice but to rent. It's not a conscious decision.
originally posted by: paraphi
Why chuck money away in rent. Chucking you well earned cash into someone else's pocket. If you can, you should buy. That's my advice.
Also, if you buy, or rent, then for God's sake read the small print and get legal advice. In that way you don't get surprises.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: superman2012
I would never buy a house in a large city. The prices are too inflated. When you can live 30-45 mins away, and pay a third of the cost to own a home with a large yard and all the amenities, it seems like a no brainer to live in a small town.
Homes in the city cost more because far more people rather live in a city than a far out suburb. Simple supply and demand. Many people rather have walkable neighborhoods with shops, restaurants, etc right at their door step instead of having to pile into a car and drive 20 minutes just go to the grocery store.
Not saying one is better than the other, but home prices reflect the values that people place on them. location. location. location. This why a 1200 sqft condo in downtown chicago may set you back $650,000 while for that same price in a suburb 50 miles away you can get a 4000 sqft house on 5 acres.
originally posted by: DD2029
Sell your house... get apartment...
invest 20% in tangible gold coins,
buy XRP and bitcoin (with caution and strategy)
invest 75% other places...
wait until next housing crisis, take advantage when market gets bad.
settle down in longterm home no later than 2029.