8 Chan QAnon Board Deleted

a reply to: aethertek
I'll help you with this. "board" and "forum" are interchangeable. they contain "threads" or "discussions" also interchangeable. so, the "board and it's discussions" or "the forum and it's threads" are part of a site. you know what that is, right?

So the whole board didn't disappear just one forum or thread.

the board /greatawakening and the single read-only thread on it is now gone or 404'd
the other board /qresearch and all of it's threads are still active

not too difficult eh? ok, school's over.

a reply to: toysforadults

There is this live Q feed. Q youtube fee 24hrX365

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD
No **** sherlock now tell me why some ignorant idiot posting to a chan board forum, thread, PM forum or whatever else you would like to call it is any different than some ignorant idiot posting here.

K~

Q is alt right fan fiction.
They want to you to believe that Q is a non party movement against deep state or whatever crap they are trying to sell yet every Q related conspiracy is about the left, Obama, Clinton, Podesta etc.
Never has a republican been a part of a Q conspiracy theory.
Q = alt right fan fiction for alt right partisan hacks living in lala land.

a reply to: aethertek

No **** sherlock

my my my. not having fun anymore?

Here's your answer

some ignorant idiot posting here.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
What revelations has he brought to the table other than a wild goose chase? One thing he may be right about though is a storm IS coming, her name is Stormy Daniels. But even if that story is true, that Trump cheated on his pregnant wife with a porn star, his supporters will most likely brush it off and say Clinton did it while in office as if that makes it any better.

He also porked a Playboy Centerfold. He seems to go the route of JFK, Clinton did the chubby girl.

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

No it's not fun watching you chase your own tail because you're simply unwilling or unable to answer a simple question.
Maybe the grammar is confusing you, here I'll switch it up a bit.

If any anonymous person can post on a chan & any anonymous person can post on ATS why is posting to a chan more believable than posting to ATS.

There I phrased it as simply as I could relying on grade school level grammar usually associated with worded math problems.

Should be a piece of cake you, seeing as you're like super intelligent & stuff.

K~

The vitriol for a hoax/larp/psyop is amazing.

Speaking for myself, I'm curious as to what is being hinted at by Q.

We all know that government is corrupt, left, right, and center. If control/power is involved, shadiness is there too.

Q's posts have been characterized as hope porn. Well, I say it sure as hell beats the alternative.

With the deletion of the dedicated posting board, and the last messages posted I think it will soon be known whether or not q was legitimate or be shown to be a hoax/larp/psyop. I've said from the beginning that I'm not so jaded that I don't hope this to be true, but I am cynical enough to say that it could indeed all be bull# and not be surprised by that.

Carry on.

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
Q is alt right fan fiction.
They want to you to believe that Q is a non party movement against deep state or whatever crap they are trying to sell yet every Q related conspiracy is about the left, Obama, Clinton, Podesta etc.
Never has a republican been a part of a Q conspiracy theory.
Q = alt right fan fiction for alt right partisan hacks living in lala land.

John McCain ("We don't like to say his name") has been mentioned in Q messages. There has even been pics of him. Last I heard the man is still a republican.

There, one of your errors fixed.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

The vitriol for a hoax/larp/psyop is amazing.

Simply calling it a potential hoax or LARP is enough for some to say it's vitriol or hatred.

Q's posts have been characterized as hope porn. Well, I say it sure as hell beats the alternative.

Hope porn beats reality and truth?

That's odd.

Yet, you have the audacity to lecture me about what I do not know and ignorance?

a reply to: MostlyReading

McCain is hated by the far right brigade

originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: MostlyReading

McCain is hated by the far right brigade

The war mongering sleeze is hated by many lefties too. And he is still a republican, which was the point of my answer to someone who claimed no republicans has ever been a part of "Q conspiracies".

So YOUR point is... what exactly?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
With the deletion of the dedicated posting board, and the last messages posted I think it will soon be known whether or not q was legitimate or be shown to be a hoax/larp/psyop.

How soon? Tell me more about what you are thinking, here. I don't know anything about the last messages posted.

I'm not sure what anyone's point is right now. You guys are pissing in each other's cereal bending over backwards to call each other stupid--over and over again. What's the point of this thread? Does anyone remember?

originally posted by: schuyler
What's the point of this thread? Does anyone remember?

Someone implying that Q board deleted = legit and others are pointing out that that is a non sequitur.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

I've been thinking mid-year for a couple of months now. By June we should see a shift in public focus of investigations and perhaps some of those who were demoted or have been forced to step down be named in indictments; Strzok, the Ohrs, Page, perhaps even McCabe.

It's obvious that the DOJ and FBI need a thorough scouring; politically appointed bureaucrats have a lot more sway than they should in how these agencies operated.

By the end of the year we might be looking to see something come from the Awans, DWS, or maybe even Huma.

There could be more (unexpected) retirements if things get serious; think Pelosi, Schumer, McCain (of course, his health might get him before then anyway), and/or plenty of others if we really get down to brass tacks.

If something like this time frame doesn't play out then I'm shifting more with you in thinking that the whole Q thing was staged as a coverup/distraction whilst skeletons were relocated by the uni-party.

I know that's 4 months away at the earliest, but this is federal government we're talking about and we know how glacial they are with change.

a reply to: MRuss

Its all there and the arhives are there too!. Thank you for posting.

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Nope !

It's probably been fingered as another troll-farm effort and closed down.
From a consistent third or fourth place here : Securingdemocracy.org

It's starting to drop away

The charts and graphs here display hashtags, topics and URLs promoted by Russia-linked influence networks on Twitter.

Content is not necessarily produced or created by Russian government operatives, although that is sometimes the case.

Instead, the network often opportunistically amplifies content created by third parties not directly linked to Russia.

Common themes for amplification include content attacking the U.S. and Europe, conspiracy theories and disinformation.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thanks for giving me your take, J&C. I may not be a believer, BUT I am glad there are believers. Perhaps, some people (used and discarded), who are in-the-know about some skeletons, might have the confidence to come forward if there are enough believers to inspire confidence.

Like maybe Billy Jack Haynes?