Does Mueller Indictment Mean Clinton Campaign Can Be Indicted for Chris Steele?

I think we should round up all foreign nationals who dared opine either way on American politics using the internet. That's obviously the high legal standard being used here for criminality.

a reply to: chadderson

You are doing a disservice to all who read this thread. People walk away DUMBER after witnessing your words. You are mincing words to try and sound right... just like your losing side does... when really you are waltzing around the truth AFRAID to admit it.

Am I incorrect?

You can discuss me and my "side" all you like, but can you refute what I said?

So far, the OP has proven my point.

originally posted by: chadderson
The indictments are nothing more than buzzword articles that make the easily controlled masses lean in the anti-Trump direction.

This is nothing more than continued subversion.

Trump wants the law on his side. The lefties want the masses on their side. Who holds the power? Will we all get to see the day the lefties fall upon their own sword or will their swarm overtake the sane?

You really are delusional, I guess a multi million dollar Russian business specifically put in place to mess with our elections is legal in your eyes.

No trump does not want the law on his side, he does everything to sway the American people AGAINST those who uphold the law. The FBI, and our INTEL, are the law!

You are one of the maybe 35% who are still to in love with trump to see it for what it really is. Also as far as I am concerned trump is an Illegitamte president.

Lets see, do I trust you or the FBI, uh, I pick the FBI!!! You go ahead and stick with trump though.

a reply to: introvert

We literally can see right through you. Just SHILLax bud.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

The DNC and Clinton campaign-funded research continued through the end of October 2016, according to the Post's report.

Pretty GD easy.

Indeed. You prove my assertion.

The DNC did not directly pay Steele. They paid a US firm.

That is not illegal.

a reply to: kurthall

Exactly, you trust those who illegally protected Clinton. This is why you have no credibility.

According to Reuters, Fusion GPS' statement on the payment said it had told Congress about how the money was paid last year to Orbis Business Intelligence, a company founded by Steele.

Same source.

CBS.

Foreign collusion.

Something 13 nationals that are up a snip creek without a paddle, and the usual suspect ignore.

Again when is Mueller going to indict Fusion GPS?

originally posted by: chadderson
a reply to: introvert

We literally can see right through you. Just SHILLax bud.

Call me a shill all you like. You still have not proven I am incorrect.

a reply to: neo96



When Obama and Hillary colluded with Russian agents, wiretapped a candidate, lied and ignored the law to influence the election process, it was ok, because there was no "intent" there.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: chadderson
a reply to: introvert

We literally can see right through you. Just SHILLax bud.

Call me a shill all you like. You still have not proven I am incorrect.

You have to prove you're correct first.......

a reply to: introvert

The DNC did not directly pay Steele. They paid a US firm.

So effing what?

a Bot is a middleman.

Didn't stop indictments.

a reply to: neo96

Again when is Mueller going to indict Fusion GPS?

You asked if the Clinton campaign could be indicted.

Are you now changing that to Fusion GPS?

Have the goal posts been moved?

a reply to: introvert

What's changed?

By that theory, when will Mueller indict Christopher Steele, FusionGPS, PerkinsCoie, the DNC and the Clinton Campaign?

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: kurthall

Yeah.

That's a real winner.

Indicting 13 people they can't touch.

A couple others for crimes that are totally unrelated.

Golf clap.

NEWSFLASH, they are being extradited! So yeah.... You are just too blind to see anything that is right in front of you. trump could be in handcuffs and you would say fake news.

People sure are blind.

The statement added that the money paid to Orbis was allocated from $1.02 million it received in fees and expenses from the Perkins Coie law firm, which represented the DNC and Clinton's campaign.

That blind hatred of Trump.

They IGNORE this.

Home grown TRAITORS.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: chadderson
a reply to: introvert

We literally can see right through you. Just SHILLax bud.

Call me a shill all you like. You still have not proven I am incorrect.

You have to prove you're correct first.......

That's illogical.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: neo96



When Obama and Hillary colluded with Russian agents, wiretapped a candidate, lied and ignored the law to influence the election process, it was ok, because there was no "intent" there.

There is ZERO proof of any of that. PLEASE show me proof....I will be waiting...shouldn't take you long, because you have said that more than once.

a reply to: neo96

So effing what?
a Bot is a middleman.
Didn't stop indictments.

Another false equivalence.

a reply to: introvert

The statement added that the money paid to Orbis was allocated from $1.02 million it received in fees and expenses from the Perkins Coie law firm, which represented the DNC and Clinton's campaign.

What's the difference betwee a bot and a law firm?

Answer:

NONE.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: chadderson
a reply to: introvert

We literally can see right through you. Just SHILLax bud.

Call me a shill all you like. You still have not proven I am incorrect.

You have to prove you're correct first.......

They want you to provide something to back up what you said. Nothing wrong with that. Show them proof.



That's illogi