The Constitution is racist & bias

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
The "constitution" is a spook, a phantasm, imagine believing that a piece of paper written by dead people 'x' amount of years ago is what gives people "rights".

that is one of the biggest authoritarian mindsets to have, that somehow we are controlled by a piece of paper with some words that someone "allowed" us to have, anyone "giving" you a "right" can easily take it away or have it be used against you, and to believe that there is some inherent "moral governance" America has is absurd...

Its simply documented proof. The documents themselves are clear that rights are given by the highest power and natural. Thus inherent as the king was notified.

As far as "dead people" years ago I have not seen the like in modern political philosophy.

The fact that the constitution is brought to answer, on the stage in this fashion, is clear that claims of its being a racist support document are more to do with subversion philosophy. And though certain blazing contradictions are clear, such as the slave holding nature of the main writers and philosophers of same, foes of natural rights and liberty highlight contradictions without any real concern for those effected by contradictions in practice or any with justifiable grievance against same. At what point are the great measures to repair, over the years to current, going to figure in?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: Bone75


Who's fault is that?

Jim Crow.

Nothing should make us expect poor people to make good decisions consistently, and when you have this poverty going back generations you begin to inhibit gene expression leading to brain growth.

What, you don't think that other humans lack the same potential that you have, do you? Generational poverty has worked its insidious magic on poor white people in the south, many of whom were already struggling from lack of work due to slavery when Reconstruction was foisted on them. Instead of compassion for the damage we have done to them with ill conceived policy, we make fun of them for being backwards rednecks and hillbillies.

Did you seriously just suggest that black people, rednecks, and hillbillies are brain damaged due to Jim Crow? Interesting.
I'm gonna have to do some research now, but in the meantime can you just agree with everything I say? I live in deep south Mississippi, which makes me one of your special people in need of special treatment.

a reply to: Bone75

No, i cited science. Repaint what i said all you want. The truth was linked for you. If you need/want more please let me know.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

So basically, your contention is that because people have lived in poverty, they are brain damaged and cannot be held to account for the things they do and thus laws are unfair?

So what do you suggest we do about it?

Allow the brain damaged people to not follow the laws?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Bone75

No, i cited science. Repaint what i said all you want. The truth was linked for you. If you need/want more please let me know.

We know there will always be 'the poor'. I think my theory on love or not love fits the reason for depression as much or more than economic status. I really do think that growing up in a family myself that was living in poverty. We started out poor, then we did well for a short time, then in poverty again and finally I got a degree at my own expense with some scholly help just as my parents were finally making it......

originally posted by: SatansPride
We all know the constitution & u.s gov. was created & established decades before we ended the paying of killing of any other race beside white. Our decloration of independence states all men are equal, while they got paid for killing every none white it states "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights". Our second ammendment states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." In which indeed neither are true if we see it at a legal (non biased, non-perspective,) way, that we have only a right to bear guns, not arms, whereas to the decloration we have rights to aquaint non-whites, not befriend them. The u.s is written, born, & conducted in racism & bias behaviors & economic value. If we consider our true law, what this country was built on, we would objectify it. So to think as our forefathers as right, we should follow the laws applied today, because their root is true. If we follow our decloration we would be at another civil war, this one full of idealisms. I think if someone were to rewrite a decloration as our forefathers stated was the correct thing to do if someones feel oppressed, the goverment(white americans idea of freedom) has no choice but to oblige to change our held true constitution of law, unless they be held accountable by the gov. themselves. It is our law & right to change our law & rights for the benefit of all peoples. We must do so soon in accordance with our prosperity & health as to not have more civil unrest & disobediance to public ordinances. If someone is to truely think the public is oppressed, i sincerely ask you to find a well drafted writer, make examples of your usurpations & grievances & file them directly to citizens of the enviroment this happens in. If seen fit by the people, the gov. has no choice but to enact upon such requests once brought forth or be subject to jail time or loss of entitlement. So in main frame, wishins for quittin.

Hold on, hold on, just HOLD ON...I speak Satanspride

What he said was...

Yo cuz, wat be happen wit dis hur guhment doc? I wuz reflectin and cuz dis doc be trippin. Dis hur doc wuz scrate up wrotten by some old a$$ white folk talkin bout equal peeps and ownin gats right, but it aint nuffin like dis. Dey is scrate up trippin fool. I mean dey is buggin fool! Ya hurd

Now does anyone here speak jive...

*Concept stolen from one of my favorite movies*

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

So basically, your contention is that because people have lived in poverty, they are brain damaged and cannot be held to account for the things they do and thus laws are unfair?

So what do you suggest we do about it?

Allow the brain damaged people to not follow the laws?

I wonder if that's why they haven't banned me yet...

This is some of the biggest social justice snowflake crap I've ever seen. And your grammar is better than most of them.

Ugh.

Please, go move somewhere else. If you don't like it here then leave. May I suggest Venezuela?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

So basically, your contention is that because people have lived in poverty, they are brain damaged and cannot be held to account for the things they do and thus laws are unfair?

So what do you suggest we do about it?

Allow the brain damaged people to not follow the laws?

No. What? No.

Why does the land of the free imprison more than anyone else? Why do we label felons so they cant get jobs? Why do we imprison so many males compared to the rest of the world, taking bread winners out of homes and leaving children without fathers? Why is all public housing mixing sex offenders with families in the same complexes? The same families where its only mom because dad is locked up?

Im pointing to an unjust system. Im not mak8ng excuses.

Id love to expand but im on mobile.

a reply to: SatansPride

the bible is good words, if jesus was a sadistic murduring bastard but wrote a good book to follow, how many people would still follow jesus? would religion be sparse, or would many more followers agree with his words? would religion be the same? the constitution is wrote by sadistic murdurous bastards but their words are good.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan


Must consider the damage done from years of generational government dole living. Its helped rot out a large % of our combined culture. There are other factors to consider as well long before we go to the extreme end of the thing, prison cells. Why? We would be finding then that the larger amount of prison residents are coming out of strongly government subsidized segments of our culture.

a reply to: Logarock

That was the substance of my prior pist on generational poverty.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Some funny changes certainly came along with industrialization and fiat money. Might as well add European controld banks into the US very early after 1830+-. What was taken from the natives with beads, as the thing goes, was then taken from the settlers for gold and sliver jingle.

a reply to: alldaylong

How about it allowed a race based slavery system???

Your pretending like the founding fathers just forgot to abolish slavery...

Half of them were horribly blue people who thought slavery was the white mans divine right and they were happy to say so in surviving letters.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: alldaylong

How about it allowed a race based slavery system???

Your pretending like the founding fathers just forgot to abolish slavery...

Half of them were horribly blue people who thought slavery was the white mans divine right and they were happy to say so in surviving letters.

Why do you fail so often? The system was set up to admit God is the provider of man's fate and that Man cannot put aside that all men and women are the same to God. Therefore, they put into the Constitution the rights of all men are not given by ANY man.

But you will keep on with your narrative as those posts never show compassion for the facts and needs of those you pretend to champion.

Nor do those post show the inkling of hope that you're even understanding that the Leftist desire to control our every thought (how dare we think for ourselves?!) . The left want to control the outcomes of freed people. That has divided you away from the rest of us like a wolf would target a sheep in the herd.

a reply to: SatansPride

Learn to use paragraphs

As I'm from the UK could some US citizen please enlighten me. Does the US constitution actually say (what the OP says) " We have rights to acquaint non whites, not befriend them"? Is this true or did the OP make it up?

originally posted by: crayzeed
As I'm from the UK could some US citizen please enlighten me. Does the US constitution actually say (what the OP says) " We have rights to acquaint non whites, not befriend them"? Is this true or did the OP make it up?

Oh you know it was absolute rubbish. The whole point is the Marxist can't take over the US and by default the rest of the planet with free people walking around doing what they want and full capable of self defense. They want us to demand the Gov do something drastic.

Free people not under the control of some authority is the problem for the Marxist. The US is set up for self governess with fairness for all the stated goal.

Fair to a group who want power is messing up their struggle to gain control. Once fairness is stamped out in the people's mind, they can move forward with the next phase of control.

a reply to: Justoneman

Another angle to the same result: you cannot police the unwilling. We have to want to give up our guns before it can really happen.

a reply to: crayzeed

what i meant is thats what they meant not said sorry, they did hate all other races while saying we equal but they came from over your way so as to be expected lol im just kiddin i hear its nice over there. the four fathers put cushions on spikes, insence to cover wretched deeds. if jesus was cruel & commited murder on huge scales people may or may not still like the bible, i for one would say you messed up for following someone who so cruel but he speaks good though.