It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus
Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.
So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?
Russian Agents, wasn't it ?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus
Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.
So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?
Russian Agents, wasn't it ?
That's the way spying works.
They don't look to Jim at the corner gas station for FSB secrets, they talk to people with inside knowledge.
Impossible to have normal debate with folks that refuse to cognate.
BTW - Trump banged a Porn Star while his wife was still nursing Barron.
Hi lawyer admitted to paying her off last night.
Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus
Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.
So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?
Russian Agents, wasn't it ?
That's the way spying works.
So HRC campaign, and the DNC cooperated with a hostile foreign government
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: soberbacchus
Absolutely. I go with Christopher Steele's own estimate of 70%-80% of the intel he was given being accurate.
So, some of it might be true, but mostly not.... And what was the source giving him the intel ?
Russian Agents, wasn't it ?
That's the way spying works.
So HRC campaign, and the DNC cooperated with a hostile foreign government
Yes..in the same way the CIA "cooperates with" North Korea when it spies on them?
Jesus...can't have rational discussions with partisan-malformed brains.
Jesus...can't have rational discussions with partisan-malformed brains.
Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
a reply to: soberbacchus
Reporting is that there are at least 3 video's of trump+hookers up for sale in Europe right now by current or former FSB looking to cash in. The CIA turned down an offer just last year.
LOL! I heard about that. According to reports, the CIA paid $100,000 for what was touted as a video of Trump with a hooker, but it turned out the video was so blurry the guy could be anybody. The CIA denied the story.
originally posted by: mobiusmale
originally posted by: Butterfinger
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
All I care about is if the info in the dossier is true or false. If it was false there is a problem. if it is true then the problem is Trumps and all these allegations of an improper FISA process are worthless. Give the actions of the right here it would sure appear that the dossier has some serious nuggets of truth.
Youre guessing at actions and press releases, or lack thereof.
Facts are in. HRC, DNC, FBI, CIA, DOJ... all are involved with creating, pushing it, or trying to clear a path for this Collusiuon narrative via the dossier.
And ironically the only clear evidence of collusion with Russia was between them and the Clintons (and their Foundation), the State Department and the DNC. The only clear evidence of Obstruction of Justice are actions taken by the DOJ (including Lynch), the FBI (including Comey and before him Mueller), the Clintons and possibly (okay, likely) even Obama himself.
Pushing the Trump/Russia collusion narrative - with the complete and active support of the MSM - is one of the most spectacular smoke screens, or diversion tactics, I have ever witnessed.
Unfortunately, for a lot of people, the one big flaw in their master plan was that they believed the Polls that said that Hillary had a 95% chance of winning the Presidency...now (the) FOX (instead of CNN) is definitely on the inside of the (hen) house, and the corruption onion is slowing being pealed, layer by layer.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus
What tape? There was an offer. Nothing was ever exchanged except for the CIA losing 100k, which they paid to receive nothing. Now...their story is what it is. But those SOBs lie for a living.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus
Probably someone dressed up like Biff Tannen doing a Back to the Future parody porn. LOL
That is a reasonable synopsis. I still don't believe anything the CIA ever says, though.
originally posted by: CB328
This is stupid, we have a President and his administration who are all criminals and the retarded Republicans are complaining about a file?! Nunes is an ass hopefully he will be voted out soon.
More at: www.redstate.com...< br />
The New York Times reports that “according to a person briefed on the inquiry,” U. S. Attorney John Durham, who is leading the investigation into the origins of the Trump/Russia investigation, has requested former CIA Director John Brennan’s “communications records including emails, call logs and other documents from the C.I.A.” Durham’s team is also said to be scrutinizing prior testimony given by Brennan.
According to the Times, Durham wants to learn what “Mr. Brennan told other officials, including former FBI Director James Comey, about his and the CIA’s views of a notorious dossier of assertions about Russia and Trump associates.”
Additionally, Durham is trying to determine if “Mr. Brennan privately contradicted his public comments, including May 2017 testimony to Congress, about both the dossier and about any debate among the intelligence agencies over their conclusions on Russia’s interference.”