It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

page: 48
203
<< 45  46  47    49  50  51 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:23 PM
link   
So in addition to following Trump around the world, Hussein now getting white substance in mail like his daughter in law

Linknypost.com...



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:25 PM
link   
Hey all! Lurked for the past decade but wanted to come back and say great work to all! Following this on the daily.. stunned and charging forward with all of you

Ankhs pic above with BC, guy second from right is pointing down with what looks to be a golden wand in his hand .. lol
Could be nothing, but I am on the hunt to help out as we move forward

Unnerving where I see this heading ... but thankful there are members like all of you here

a reply to: AnkhMorpork




posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: AnkhMorpork


Re: The hidden or secret sperm in the Obama portrait that Hannity was referring to in his now deleted tweet and linked article.

It's on Obama's left (again, the LEFT) part of his forehead, a hidden sperm, where the artist likes to include sperm squiggles (with head) in his paintings.

www.infowars.com...

Again, probably the wrong choice of artist, but he was the guy who liked to paint black women beheading white women, so Michelle probably urged him in this particular artist's direction.

What I find to be interesting, symbolic and historic about it, given what's been going on behind the scenes and with these Q drops, is how that painting will hang in the Whitehouse, perhaps as an ever-present reminder of what must be shunned in the halls of power and authority, now, and in perpetuity.


Now I'm thinking about the hair gel scene from 'Something About Mary'.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: interupt42


I'm in agreement with crankyoldman on how best to keep this thread on track.

It's also not out of the realm of possible that Q has found it and may observe.

I've made a few long posts that wandered off into the land of far reaching speculation, but, I felt that they made important contributions.

This is a different kind of thread, not for mere chat.

In fact, I would encourage people to really make it count with their every post, and to try to distill as much as possible, with accompanying links, graphics etc. to help highlight what's being presented.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: AnkhMorpork


Re: The hidden or secret sperm in the Obama portrait that Hannity was referring to in his now deleted tweet and linked article.

It's on Obama's left (again, the LEFT) part of his forehead, a hidden sperm, where the artist likes to include sperm squiggles (with head) in his paintings.

www.infowars.com...

Again, probably the wrong choice of artist, but he was the guy who liked to paint black women beheading white women, so Michelle probably urged him in this particular artist's direction.

What I find to be interesting, symbolic and historic about it, given what's been going on behind the scenes and with these Q drops, is how that painting will hang in the Whitehouse, perhaps as an ever-present reminder of what must be shunned in the halls of power and authority, now, and in perpetuity.


Now I'm thinking about the hair gel scene from 'Something About Mary'.

Ewww, it looks like it's under his skin. Now I'm thinking of the scarabs from the Mummy movies.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Generally, I post things that seem relevant to me based on key words in the articles or relationship to issues we've been discussing. I try to keep it brief when I drop those things in figuring that if others here think they are important, they will take off.

Or I will take a name or cluster of words/terms and search on them and maybe go pages deep into Google to see what I turn up.

I treat this more like a free-association/brainstorming session than anything else.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan



Now we're getting into the realm of the black goo. It shows up all over the place in fiction. The X-Files is just one place.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:45 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
This vid was atop her (Liz Crokin's) FB feed today.

Edit: MUST WATCH!


KaBoom finally getting my family to watch it Have a big family over 500 +
Getting way to many question 2 are getting mad at me for not answering faster
toll them too Google it
edit on 13-2-2018 by Trillium because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: AnkhMorpork


Re: The hidden or secret sperm in the Obama portrait that Hannity was referring to in his now deleted tweet and linked article.

It's on Obama's left (again, the LEFT) part of his forehead, a hidden sperm, where the artist likes to include sperm squiggles (with head) in his paintings for some strange reason.

www.infowars.com...

Again, probably the wrong choice of artist, but he was the guy who liked to paint black women beheading white women, so Michelle probably urged him in this particular artist's direction.

What I find to be interesting, symbolic and historic about it, given what's been going on behind the scenes and with these Q drops, is how that painting will hang in the Whitehouse, perhaps as an ever-present reminder of what must be shunned in the halls of power and authority, now, and in perpetuity.


Maybe this painting is showing two sides of Obama: the right side is his public persona, the left his darker, secret one.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can anyone read the letters & numbers on the front of BHO's chair?
twitter.com...


The last part looks like it reads 1961.

Did you happen to scroll down and look at the reply tweets at all?? About halfway down the page, someone posted the pic...retweeted maybe? And instead of showing the photo, there was a warning message saying that post contains content that might be sensitive, with a button to view it.

Why would a photo with obscured lettering pointed out be considered sensitive material??

Because it is important.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Greenanon




The only place we haven’t gone is religion.


Some of us have tried to go there. However, that might be the biggest can of worms of them all, and people don't want to open it. Understandably.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:26 PM
link   
Justice Antonin Scalia died two years ago today.

RIP, sir.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: megabogie

here's a close up



You mean like this one:

Link

Alex and Ani Evil Eye expandable charm ring.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: Greenanon




The only place we haven’t gone is religion.


Some of us have tried to go there. However, that might be the biggest can of worms of them all, and people don't want to open it. Understandably.


Straight to RATS. That alone should say something. Eh?



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: megabogie

here's a close up


It sort of looks like an owl to me.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Rosinitiate

originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: Greenanon




The only place we haven’t gone is religion.


Some of us have tried to go there. However, that might be the biggest can of worms of them all, and people don't want to open it. Understandably.


Straight to RATS. That alone should say something. Eh?


Yes indeed.



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork


The funny part of it all, is people accept it as a genuine fluke and not at all a Psyop.

I mean re-read that meme again and ask yourself: Really?

I'll just leave it at that, it'll just go right through the ears of most following this thread.
edit on 13-2-2018 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Rosinitiate

I trust my discernment and evaluative skills taking into account all available information and data. I was at one time a Clinton and an Obama supporter, but retained sufficient open-mindedness to reevaluate based on new knowledge, and some past experience.

Trump isn't really a Republican or a Democrat and part of the reason he's been under so much attack is precisely because he isn't beholden to the various special interests, not entirely anyway.

What I find interesting is the way people have a certain tendency of tipping their hand in terms of their particular biases and agendas and what they presume to know with certainty including as it relates to certain religious conceptions.

But no, I don't buy the idea that the whole thing was a set up and psyop, no.

I've considered it though - could Trump be pure evil? So I looked some more, and that's not an accurate assessment, unless one was say a theistic occult satanist whe's aware that the Q drops are real.

Demonizing Trump or suggesting that he's in bed with the "satanics" (that's what i call them and their network and practices) isn't an accurate reflection of reality.

He's trying, in his own often flawed way, to do his best and do what's right, and there hasn't been a POTUS like that since JFK.

edit on 13-2-2018 by AnkhMorpork because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 13 2018 @ 05:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
a reply to: Rosinitiate

I trust my discernment and evaluative skills taking into account all available information and data. I was at one time a Clinton and an Obama supporter, but retained sufficient open-mindedness to reevaluate based on new knowledge, and some past experience.

Trump isn't really a Republican or a Democrat and part of the reason he's been under so much attack is precisely because he isn't beholden to the various special interests, not entirely anyway.

What I find interesting is the way people have a certain tendency of tipping their hand in terms of their particular biases and agendas and what they presume to know with certainty including as it relates to certain religious conceptions.

But no, I don't buy the idea that the whole thing was a set up and psyop, no.

I considered it though - could Trump be pure evil? So I looked some more, and that's not an accurate assessment, unless one was say a theistic occult satanist whe's aware that the Q drops are real.

Demonizing Trump or suggesting that he's in bed with the "satanics" (that's what i call them) isn't an accurate reflection of reality.

He's trying, in his own often flawed way, to do his best and do what's right, and there hasn't been a POTUS like that since JFK.


If you say so.

However, we are still spending trillions, still bombing Syrians and financing SA's bombing of Yemen, Israel attacking Iran, 5G network still moving forward, still legal to collect all citizen data, etc, etc.

The only thing I've seen change is the storyline. Quite compelling
Thank God for discernment though.
edit on 13-2-2018 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
203
<< 45  46  47    49  50  51 >>

log in

join