-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Comments:
1) Changes seem to apply on January 1st 2019?
2) The appendices do not seem available at the link so difficult to say whether the EO is increasing or decreasing Military Court powers?

This EO seems to be in regard to changes the military sought to make in its procedural process concerning court martial trials. It seems to have been listed for public comment last year, so this is not really related to Q stuff per se. You'd need to hunt down each annex to determine the change, from my quick peruse it seemed to be procedural in the court itself related to witnesses, evidence etc, likely updates as the original manual is from 1984.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Could this be allowing for new defences, in the future "FREEDOM" world of 2019, where the defendant has been ordered to do something against the constitution or against American citizens?

I.E. could it be adding better checks and balances for the future, which stop Military commanders being able to be politically partisan (deep state) by stopping the assumption of absolute chain of command control?

Remember, I'm just an ignorant limey in terms of US Military.

Speaking of meanings of names Pontiff - pont - bridge, I noticed something interesting in the earlier article a member posted regarding Simon of Trent the 2 year old saint.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

The phrase that jumped out at me was: "Thence, he summoned the bishop and the podestà to answer for their conduct."

So I searched an online dictionary for the meaning of podesta. As I'm sure most would know, many surnames derived from what the person did for a living. Anyway...

www.dictionary.com...

noun 1. any of certain magistrates in Italy, as a chief magistrate in medieval towns and republics.
2. a person appointed to serve as mayor of an Italian city during the Fascist regime.

Just found it interesting and thought I'd share.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

This is Annex 1 and 2 the EO is refering too. Annex 1 and 2 (Manual for Courts-Martial)

Edit: It has 636 pages.

a reply to: heffo7

It IS interesting Heffo!

It also means that the surname would be reasonably common. Just as well, as I found out last week there was a Podesta at my boarding school in the UK, a few years ahead of me. I didn't find any links to the infamous brothers thank God as this one seems to be in the social elite old boy network and could have been a US/UK bridge.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

Not sure I'm allowed to read it as not American? Thanks for digging it out though!

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Re: BRIDGE

A video I was just watching pointed out that the name PONTIFF for the pope, is derived from "Pont" meaning BRIDGE!

Beautifully done.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: IAMTAT

Should I add a "MIRROR DATE" column to the UNANSWERED Q spreadsheet?

If so, am I right in interpreting the mirror date is 111 days after the Q post date?

11/12/17 = 3/3/18
11/13/17 = 3/4/18 etc. ?

I would suggest yes. I woke up with the word mirrors in my head...not even remotely for the first time. Mirrors, and imposters. So you've got my vote, for what it's worth.

originally posted by: ketsuko
There was a Prop 187 in Cali?

Whose bright idea was that?

"Conventional wisdom" is that it signaled the "death" of the Republican party in California because it sought to bar illegal immigrant from public social services.

It is California who uses the 187 to designate a homicide by their law enforcement. So it makes perfect sense.

a reply to: tigertatzen
I've added the column but I have a couple of concerns with the way the Anons have interpreted the "mirror":

1) To properly reflect a mirror, we would take the keystone point in time and apply the number of days from post to the keystone date, then add that after the key date to get a reflection of the post in the future?

It seems to me that the way the Anons are describing it is more like a PROJECTOR, projecting the future action a set number of days after the original post. This means the keystone is only relevant in terms of when to start interpreting forward... it is not a part of the algorithm from proposal to action for each post?

2) The anons calculations seem to say the action occurs 111 days after the post "proposal".

I thought 111 was a negative number? Could you give me your views on this please? You know so much more.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: tigertatzen
I've added the column but I have a couple of concerns with the way the Anons have interpreted the "mirror":

1) To properly reflect a mirror, we would take the keystone point in time and apply the number of days from post to the keystone date, then add that after the key date to get a reflection of the post in the future?

It seems to me that the way the Anons are describing it is more like a PROJECTOR, projecting the future action a set number of days after the original post. This means the keystone is only relevant in terms of when to start interpreting forward... it is not a part of the algorithm from proposal to action for each post?

2) The anons calculations seem to say the action occurs 111 days after the post "proposal".

I thought 111 was a negative number? Could you give me your views on this please? You know so much more.

It's been suggested that the Keystone represents Pennsylvania...'The Keystone State'.
What if it represents, not the state itself,...but for what the state is responsible:

NBC News now projects Donald Trump to win Pennsylvania and its 20 electoral votes, bringing him beyond the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency.

www.cnbc.com...

What if The moment Trump became elected POTUS is designated the 'Keystone'?

THAT moment was when the anticipated timeline was derailed...and a new potentiality was formed.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: tigertatzen
I've added the column but I have a couple of concerns with the way the Anons have interpreted the "mirror":

1) To properly reflect a mirror, we would take the keystone point in time and apply the number of days from post to the keystone date, then add that after the key date to get a reflection of the post in the future?

It seems to me that the way the Anons are describing it is more like a PROJECTOR, projecting the future action a set number of days after the original post. This means the keystone is only relevant in terms of when to start interpreting forward... it is not a part of the algorithm from proposal to action for each post?

2) The anons calculations seem to say the action occurs 111 days after the post "proposal".

I thought 111 was a negative number? Could you give me your views on this please? You know so much more.

The number eleven in numerology is the number of illumination. Of Light. It is far from a negative number. It represents spiritual enlightenment and awakening potential. Illumination through cosmic consciousness.

In the Tarot, the number eleven represents Justice. It is one of the three Master Numbers, and it is the number known as the Master Teacher.

The cabal always mirror Light for two reasons: 1)negativity is necessary for existence, to create polarity in all things. Yin and Yang. Without it, we would all live in an Eden-like innocence and would never learn to make choices...and never evolve to the next level. 2) they cannot raise the energy they need without using our own sacred symbols. Turning the cosmic force of Light Magick into trickery and distortion, using it to make us enslave ourselves.

In numerology, Master numbers hold very specific power. This one is meant to show the truth. They pervert it for their own Dark means, but they cannot use it otherwise...they use it in a way that mocks. They mirror us, our core beliefs.

And one of the things they call themselves is the Illuminati. Represented by the number eleven. Symbolically holding the Light while casting everyone else into blindness.

If you are standing in a dark room and someone shines a light at you, you will be illuminated. However...if you are holding a mirror and someone shines the same light, by capturing it in the mirror, you will reflect that light directly back at the person shining it. You remain hidden, and the person's own light is now a weapon that blinds them.

Now, we're holding both the Light and the mirror. Their number eleven is now in our power. They reflect the Light because they cannot exist within it. Our job is to illuminate everyone to what the Illuminati actually is, using their own distortion of the truth back on them.

Why does this terrify them? Darkness cannot exist in the presence of Light. There are more of us than them, therefore we've got a much bigger mirror.

They mirrored us, to make us blind and enslave ourselves. Now we're reflecting it back on them and making them destroy themselves.

The numbers 11, 111, 1111...all mean the same thing. Adding another one to the sequence only magnifies the power of the original number. They're using three of them for a specific ritualistic purpose that has nothing to do with the number eleven.

But if one of us sees that number and recognizes it for what it actually is, there is a message within it. The message is that we are winning. We are bringing Light to the darkness. We are the true Illuminati.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
I've added the column but I have a couple of concerns with the way the Anons have interpreted the "mirror":

1) To properly reflect a mirror, we would take the keystone point in time and apply the number of days from post to the keystone date, then add that after the key date to get a reflection of the post in the future?

It seems to me that the way the Anons are describing it is more like a PROJECTOR, projecting the future action a set number of days after the original post. This means the keystone is only relevant in terms of when to start interpreting forward... it is not a part of the algorithm from proposal to action for each post?

2) The anons calculations seem to say the action occurs 111 days after the post "proposal".

I thought 111 was a negative number? Could you give me your views on this please? You know so much more.

Rel:

If remember right, the early versions of this tech were called Looking Glass, and there was no way to alter what they saw, just looked at then reacted in an attempt to change. The main issue here is all happens at one time, now. March 2, 2096 is now.

The earthly version of that tech is not linear and doesn't really work the way folks think "time travel" works. The issue is what version are they using? The posts read backwards would suggest the one the CIA group uses is well inferior and works with limited parameters and is unable to detect the so called white hat's version.

Traditionally a choice point is selected, think election, and when HRC blew it the choice points for the CIA version blew up even though they tried; the consciousness of the planet went in a direction they had never planned on. Once the point is selected, as in desired outcome, enough of the collective energy must be "steered" into the outcome - see my previous posts on freewill etc. Once enough energy is harnessed the "timeline" moves into the desired one, no one the wiser even if the other version exits too. This never happens with people knowing just MSM shouting codes. You don't jump forward and kill trump negating all of this, that's TV and movies or go back and do it.

Q folks took a novel approach, notifying and garnering energy to steer in real time. See post on how many people are needed. "Clock Started" suggests the requisite energy was reached, timeline opened, out smarting the alternate version. We now see it in the clues because it is done. It isn't time travel, though seen from here kinda is, but from 4d and up it is not, only collective choice in the now.

As for 111, nothing is "negative" only folks taking X and turning it so. Codes and numbers in 3d are as so, so best to use them if possible because folks are conditioned to accept, using force against itself.

a reply to: tigertatzen

Perhaps my internet sarcasm font was not on strongly enough.

a reply to: tigertatzen

Excellent and illuminating response Tiger, thank you!

a reply to: crankyoldman

Thanks Cranky, for making this easier to grapple with... feeling much more comfortable after reading your response!

originally posted by: crankyoldman
If remember right, the early versions of this tech were called Looking Glass, and there was no way to alter what they saw, just looked at then reacted in an attempt to change. The main issue here is all happens at one time, now. March 2, 2096 is now.

The earthly version of that tech is not linear and doesn't really work the way folks think "time travel" works. The issue is what version are they using? The posts read backwards would suggest the one the CIA group uses is well inferior and works with limited parameters and is unable to detect the so called white hat's version.

Traditionally a choice point is selected, think election, and when HRC blew it the choice points for the CIA version blew up even though they tried; the consciousness of the planet went in a direction they had never planned on. Once the point is selected, as in desired outcome, enough of the collective energy must be "steered" into the outcome - see my previous posts on freewill etc. Once enough energy is harnessed the "timeline" moves into the desired one, no one the wiser even if the other version exits too. This never happens with people knowing just MSM shouting codes. You don't jump forward and kill trump negating all of this, that's TV and movies or go back and do it.

Q folks took a novel approach, notifying and garnering energy to steer in real time. See post on how many people are needed. "Clock Started" suggests the requisite energy was reached, timeline opened, out smarting the alternate version. We now see it in the clues because it is done. It isn't time travel, though seen from here kinda is, but from 4d and up it is not, only collective choice in the now.

As for 111, nothing is "negative" only folks taking X and turning it so. Codes and numbers in 3d are as so, so best to use them if possible because folks are conditioned to accept, using force against itself.

i've got to say, i'm constantly surprised in the new directions y'all take this. you've got time cube beat, down.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I can certainly understand the relevance of Pennsylvania being the keystone for an election in the past leading us to this point.

However, I'm assuming the reason Q is pushing us to find the keystone is something to do with the future? In essence, the keystone is important for the future because it STRENGTHENS AND SOLIDIFIES the correct reality for the future?

As Cranky has shown, I was still thinking in 3D in this response

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: IAMTAT

I can certainly understand the relevance of Pennsylvania being the keystone for an election in the past leading us to this point.

However, I'm assuming the reason Q is pushing us to find the keystone is something to do with the future? In essence, the keystone is important for the future because it STRENGTHENS AND SOLIDIFIES the correct reality for the future?

As Cranky has shown, I was still thinking in 3D in this response

The moment Trump reached 270...(because of Pennsylvania)...the anticipated timeline was derailed...and a new potentiality was formed.

I may have just had an Epiphany... members advise please...


Plenty of Q posts using the term Godfather III... perhaps this means:

Pope Francis + retired Pope Benedict + The Black Pope (Jesuit general)?


What say you?