New FBI Strzok Texts Reveal Massive Top Level Conspiracy To Evade Security & Monitering

a reply to: DJW001

I suspect Mueller will end his investigation next week. It looks like it could be moving in that direction as of last night.

originally posted by: Moresby
All those texts reveal is how two people act when they just start dating.

Embarrassing? Yes. But only in a human (we've all done it) way.

Politically significant? Nah.

You're right they should be working for a mortgage company.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: DupontDeux

The most damning part is not the discussion in itself, but the straight up admission, that the monitoring is an issue.

There it is, clear as day; they want to keep conducting themselves in a manner that cannot stand the light of the day. The monitoring is already an issue.

You know, this makes me think about it another way too.

They both had personal phones, so why were they needing to use
government issued phones to carry on?

They seem to only discuss work issues anyways, why hide that?

Unless they were conspiring, as in a conspiracy to set up and
follow through with The Insurance Policy?

Because they thought the FBI would protect them.... They wouldn't have that extra layer of protection with a private phone.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Nice try... This all falls apart when you pay attention to them WANTING to avoid retention ; They are clearly NOT discussing a problem with retention, but to avoid it.

a reply to: theantediluvian

The problem with this is we already have the "context" in which this discussion is taking place. It's been framed by previous text releases...

"So when discussion Hillary, we should these phones because they can't be traced ?"

That one in particular frames all the following conversations.

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: theantediluvian

The problem with this is we already have the "context" in which this discussion is taking place. It's been framed by previous text releases...

"So when discussion Hillary, we should these phones because they can't be traced ?"

That one in particular frames all the following conversations.

Right. Individually, most of the releases have meant very little, but every one seems to be an individual thread of a rope headed the same direction.

originally posted by: burntheships


What in the world is going on here?

First thing that is going on is that you altered the OP Headline in the breaking news forum?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: DJW001

I suspect Mueller will end his investigation next week. It looks like it could be moving in that direction as of last night.

End of April or beginning of May and definitely not before interviewing Trump.

Other alternative is the Massacre.

FBI Director Christopher Wray has made clear that he thinks the memo is intentionally misleading and contains intentional factual omissions (even after editing)

Christopher Wray is Trumps hand-picked appointee after he fired Comey.

Trump might fire Christopher Wray and Rosenstein and then end the Mueller investigation.

You can count on millions in the streets across the country demanding impeachment if that happens.

At that stage, if the GOP led congress refuses to impeach, the mid-terms will be a blood-bath and impeachment will happen by Christmas.

Too bad they work for the FBI and not the NSA

Don’t ask people to listen to everyone and expect them not to listen to you.

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos
a reply to: theantediluvian

The problem with this is we already have the "context" in which this discussion is taking place. It's been framed by previous text releases...

"So when discussion Hillary, we should these phones because they can't be traced ?"

That one in particular frames all the following conversations.

“So look,” the text from Page to Strzok reads, “you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced, you were just venting [because] you feel bad that you’re gone so much but it can’t be helped right now.”

People familiar with the matter said that, although Page’s message may appear to suggest that she and Strzok used a separate communications channel for discussing the Clinton case, the point of her text was to advise Strzok how to explain to his wife why the two of them had been texting each other.

www.washingtonpost.com... 017/12/15/23205bee-e1b6-11e7-bbd0-9dfb2e37492a_story.html

He was telling her to discuss the Clinton investigation when she texted him so that his wife would think it was business.

originally posted by: Greenanon
Too bad they work for the FBI and not the NSA

Don’t ask people to listen to everyone and expect them not to listen to you.

The thing these two are most guilty of is incompetence.

For the positions they held, not being aware that all of their communications were being logged?

Just insane stupidity IMO.

That said, I have yet to see anything at all that suggests they let their loins or political bias interfere with either investigation.

Everybody has genitalia and everyone has political opinions. We outlaw that in government and DC would be a ghost-town.

a reply to: soberbacchus

By the end of this the only government entities The American people will want will be the NSA and Military.

At least the NSA is sorry.

a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

Yep, counts the same as being at work on same kinds of sites.

If you are on the phone, it needs to be for work related business. The company pays for that data plan for work purposes.

I think its fine like this, being it IT, theres less problems with devices if they only do work on them. Imagine that!

You want to flirt or watch cat videos, you have to pay for it yourself.

you sound like a right bell end

Wow, thanks for that insult.

I just work here, I didnt make the rules.

Would you want to pay for someones phone and data, just to have them waste it on flirting and porn?

a reply to: burntheships

I despise all of these Liberal miscreant’s. Many are dishonest in politics, but they wrote the book, they’re devious, scandalous and they blame others for things they do. They make up stories to destroy people simply because they didn’t get their way, they create trouble and violence (Antifa and BLM) and then support those trouble makers financially and even their supporters join the bandwagon and support all of this evil crap that they do and make excuses for them. If one person gets locked up for all of this FISA stuff, and Hillary Clinton doesn’t....we really need to evaluate who is running our country and why she is the exception. She should have been locked up countless times by now, and for things done years ago. So, don’t let all of this FBI stuff distract you into taking your eye off of what’s really happening....don’t take the focus off of Hillary. Somehow, I think she is willing to sacrifice all FBI agents to save her own neck. She’s in on this deep.

a reply to: burntheships

The house of cards is starting to burn. Can you feel it? I wonder what else is hidden within the FBI vault. S&F

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: burntheships

The house of cards is starting to burn. Can you feel it? I wonder what else is hidden within the FBI vault. S&F

This isn't going to be synonymous with just the Democratic party, when this thing starts to crumble it'll pull anyone connected to it down.

originally posted by: CrawlingChaos

Because they thought the FBI would protect them.... They wouldn't have that extra layer of protection with a private phone.

Ah, yes. You have the best answer here, thank you!

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
So, don’t let all of this FBI stuff distract you into taking your eye off of what’s really happening....don’t take the focus off of Hillary. Somehow, I think she is willing to sacrifice all FBI agents to save her own neck. She’s in on this deep.

Absolutely!

She is a black widow if there ever was one.

It's illegal.