It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Daniel108
WHAT I AM PRESENTING IS THERE FOR DISCUSSION AND FURTHER RESEARCH.
IT IS UP TO EACH PERSON TO DECIDE THE TRUTH FOR THEMSELVES.
I have been researching UFOs and abduction experiences for many years and will present some of the information I've gathered, along with that from whistleblowers who entrusted me with their inside information. There are thousands of UFO related abduction accounts going back to Betty and Barney Hill, and probably many others before them that never made the news.
snip
Dr. Simon Reveals his Real Thoughts on the Hill "UFO Abduction" Case
The abduction did not take place but was a reproduction of Betty's dream which occurred right after the sighting.Dr. Simon's skepticism concerning the abduction story could not have been more directly stated. He told Klass that "my interest in UFOs was almost entirely on the phenomena of Barney's developing racial paranoia which seemed to me to have been the best representation on the matter I had seen" (p. 8).
Dr. Simon stated his skepticism quite directly for the first time on the NBC-TV Today show on the morning of the premiere of the NBC-TV movie, The UFO Incident (October 20, 1975). Klass apparently had chided Dr. Simon for not speaking out on this sooner. Dr. Simon defends his reluctance to speak out on the grounds of not being given sufficient opportunity to explain it fully. Dr. Simon says that it was James Oberg's review of Klass' book published in Technology Review, chiding him for not speaking out about his skepticism on the Hill story, that finally convinced Dr. Simon to do so! Oberg wrote,
why was it left to Mr. Klass to reveal that the psychiatrist who treated Betty and Barney Hill (The Interrupted Journey) never for a moment believed that they had been inside a flying saucer, while Look magazine used his misquoted words as an endorsement?
originally posted by: abe froman
I miss these kinds of threads.
Some of the ideas in your photo stream are intriguing, such as tall greys using hypnotic mind tricks to appear as Nordics.
My question regarding aliens needing our DNA is, how long would such a project have to last?
Wouldn't it be a short term project, like a couple of decades to gather all the DNA and genetic materials they'd need? Then be off...
My knowledge indicates they have been trading their technology for our DNA going back to the 1940s or so, about the time when UFOs first became a subject of interest. Exactly why at this time would be speculation on my part. However, there is another area related to your question, and that concerns the true cause of climate change, it being a natural process not due to humankind. This process is known to the fallen Nephilim, especially that it will culminate in the near future at which time they will no longer be able to use us as they have been doing. I'll see what I can share with you on this subject below (the event referred to in the first link refers to this natural process):
flic.kr...
flic.kr...
I know this is new to you. I will add more on this subject later
This is the kind of thread that warrants discussion not wanton "debunking".
There are thousands of UFO related abduction accounts going back to Betty and Barney Hill, and probably many others before them that never made the news.
Whistleblowers report that aliens have made agreements with governments to trade their technology for our genetics which they need because they have degenerated....
Whistleblowers report that aliens have made agreements with governments to trade their technology for our genetics
These people, such as Charles Hall and Thomas Costello, are heroes who risked being jailed for breaking their agreements to remain silent, even facing the threat of death for exposing what they knew about aliens
Wouldn't it be a short term project, like a couple of decades to gather all the DNA and genetic materials they'd need? Then be off...
But how many can you name with anything beyond anecdotal evidence?
And how many can you name that occurred outside of the United States?
Also why would you need so many samples of human DNA and keep abducting people for years?
Really? So what technology would that be?
Yet not a word is said about them from officialdom and they are allowed to tell stories freely.
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Daniel108
Personally I think it's wishful thinking to assume their biology is failing and that they need us but we don't need them is simply absurd.
They are far more successful than we are as species. They got technology which is so far beyond our comprehension it seems unreal to us, like magic. With the entire universe at their fingertips. What do we have?
We destroy our planet, wipe out every living thing in our way, our genes, especially the y-chromosome are in decay and we poison ourselves with chemistry which demonstrably makes us a lot dumber generation by generation.
The interest they have in us is more an anthropological curiousity. We are an item in their research catalogue.
Our religious stories are partially history of alien interaction. And that's precisely where we are now, in a competition with eachother who gets a bunk on their Ark, if there's even a single one to be found who appears worthy of "preservation". And it ain't looking very promising.