House intel committee votes on party lines to release the memo

a reply to: pheonix358

I'm alt left?. There are a lot of people who would be surprised to hear that. But they actually know me so they have something to go by too.

You left out your reply to me btw. You just quoted my post back to me.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: WhatTheory

I'm certain I do not know who pencil neck is.

[1][4][1][13] [19][3][8][9][6][6]

originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: Grambler

Mark my words. His speech will start "My fellow Americans, The storm is upon us..."

maybe trump will say something to unite all the white nationalists to form their own government, and he will be their leader.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Grambler

The Democrats weren't the ones pretending that releasing partisan hitjob memos based on highly classified source material — that none of us will ever get to see — was "transparency" or in the public interest.

That was the Republicans. They used the pretense of transparency and serving the public interest to argue for releasing the Nunes memo. That bull# went right out the window when it came to letting out anything they don't want us to see.

No the democrats were the ones that paid a firm to pay a foreign agent to get partisan opposition research on trump from Kremlin sources, then have the info be used not only by the FBI but the media to smear trump, and then lied about it for a year while bloviating about that info like it wasnt partisan info.

Again, the republicans voted today to allow all of congress to see the dem memo, which was the exact same first step with the republican memo.

Don't forget the WHY.

WHY they did it is the treasonous part!

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: WhyDidIJoin
a reply to: Grambler

Mark my words. His speech will start "My fellow Americans, The storm is upon us..."

maybe trump will say something to unite all the white nationalists to form their own government, and he will be their leader.

Okay, point to this doll and tell us where Heir Trump hurt you!

a reply to: Sillyolme

Hyperbole to the extreme.

I can't believe a lefty would be arguing against transparency and scrutiny.

The party of liberty, freedom, accountability and radical transparency is a sham. All talk, posturing and ethic signaling.

a reply to: jimmyx

Maybe, but I doubt it. About as likely as him saying something to unite all black nationalists (or insert arbitrary constructed division term here)

Again the party which allegedly stands against "divisiveness" (that term we heard non-stop in 2016, much like "fake news") is being divisive. Great

a reply to: Sillyolme

You left out your reply to me btw. You just quoted my post back to me.

That is all I needed to do. Try reading the whole post this time.

P

This memo, the FISA warrant, this whole thing is about a political party using/weaponizing a government department (FBI) to spy on a rival political candidate.


Now I can't believe for one minute that anyone with the sense God gave a piss-ant would think that this is okay.


Yet here we are.


So many think that this is okay.

Well, shame on all of you.

SHAME!

a reply to: Greenanon

Black Monday

Best part is, the lifeboats have already disembarked. Any official still on board with this Russia-conspiracy theory/hyperbole is about to be thoroughly discredited.

..a great day to be a patriot indeed!

a reply to: DBCowboy

DB, it's ok because Donald Trump is a ____________________________.

Therefore, justified....right?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: DBCowboy

DB, it's ok because Donald Trump is a ____________________________.

Therefore, justified....right?

Yeah.

What was I thinking.

a reply to: JBurns

Schiff and co doubled down on Russia today. The means they really don't have any other out.

originally posted by: Grambler
Adam Schiff is giving a statement right now that the intel committee has voted to release the memo.

They also voted not to release adam schiffs democratic memo that they wrote in response.

Now Trump has 5 days to decide rather or not to release it.

I will add sources as they become available.

thehill.com...

Als apparently the committee did vote to allow all members of the house to see the democratic memo, which was the exact same process they took with the republican memo before it was released to the public.

Democrats, voting as a block, tried to advance a series of motions they said would help put the Republican memo in context. All but one of those motions failed along party lines. The committee did make a Democratic memo rebutting the Republican version available to the full House but not to the public.

www.nytimes.com...

I have a bobblehead of him.

I'd like to see Trump break his neck like Phissspok does to other Paks.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Nunes is a biased lap dog. I do not think his little memo is any more than an attempt to throw a monkey wrench into the investigation. I do not think that the FISA court allows for abuses since to extend a warrant the applicant needs to prove that the original has been successful and born fruit. If it had not they never would have approved the extension.
I'm assured by professionals from both parties that no laws were broken. I am worried that some people are going to be misled by this.

Wait.
You were "assured by professionals from both parties that no laws were broken."
So, who assured you?

a reply to: DBCowboy

At the same time I have a problem just taking these folks at their word.

Will they release the evidence?

Will partisans demand they do or be happy the memo gets released and just take the same guys who voted for more spying word for it?

Cause I thoroughly don't believe a word from these people's mouths.

Especially when it's what I want to hear. The record shows me that's when it's most dangerous.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pheonix358

I'm alt left?. There are a lot of people who would be surprised to hear that. But they actually know me so they have something to go by too.

You left out your reply to me btw. You just quoted my post back to me.

You lie and your friends swear to it.

or visa versa.

Hillary is going down, deal.

a reply to: luthier


What if it's true?

What if it is shown, without fail, that one administration used the justice system like their own secret police to spy on an opposition party?

What then?

I bet there will still be people defending it.

Will you be one of them?

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: DBCowboy

At the same time I have a problem just taking these folks at their word.

Will they release the evidence?

Will partisans demand they do or be happy the memo gets released and just take the same guys who voted for more spying word for it?

Cause I thoroughly don't believe a word from these people's mouths.

Especially when it's what I want to hear. The record shows me that's when it's most dangerous.

Why did McCabe 'resign' early, just hours after Wray read the memo?
Word is that McCabe will probably be fired as early as tomorrow.

This vaunted memo will likely be not only another Gerlado trunk caper

But also a basket of crazy Trump and republican delusion, lies and deception